always scum
Open 54 - Basic 12 Player (over) before 529
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Counterproductive.Glork wrote:
Counterproductive.Elmo wrote:Randomvote:appleof88.
Also, Patrick is never scum, so FoS: Glork for voting for a confirmed townie.
Counterproductive.JDodge wrote:Vote: IH
always scum-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
If it's worth anything, it worries me tooRipley wrote:
Have things truly come to this? That the premier example of an experienced Mafia elder that occurs to a new player is -Sikario8 wrote:not so much that they wouldn't listen to me as much as it was my establishing that i was, in no way, form, or fashion, a Battle Mage or mneme or any other experienced player.Battle Mage?-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
i'm not voting andy, but can i do this anywaysGlork wrote:I want each person on Andy to give me exactly three sentences (between 15 and 45 words) on why they are voting for Andy.
gogogo-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
I find it odd the way Elmo's obsessing over this, but not actually acting on it. Does anyone else agree?Elmo wrote:I'd do that, too. What'd you of JDodge lynch, Glork? 295 =amazinglyscummy.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Meh, it was more "I don't like a Patrick lynch, and something seems off about Andy's vote" thingGlork wrote:Eh. I'm somewhat apathetic about a JDodge lynch. I'm not a huge fan of the post, but I know that JD's posts so far have been consistent with his general posting style. Naturally, I'd like him to elaborate on why he thinks Andy is scum (including why "save his own skin" -- if true -- is indicative of being a scumbag) and I'd like to hear his thoughts on everyone else.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Yes. It is. Because obsessing over one thing means that you're trying to mount a charge on someone with reasoning that youElmo wrote:
Two posts is hardly obsessing. Regardless, I find it scummy, is it bad to 'obsess' over possible scumtells, JD?JDodge wrote:I find it odd the way Elmo's obsessing over this, but not actually acting on it. Does anyone else agree?
I said I was still thinking.acknowledgeis weak, but try to reinforce by repeating ad nauseam.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Why am I not surprised?Elmo wrote:Unvote:wank;vote:JDodge.
Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Why can't the two reasons co-exist? I will admit that I withheld my main reason at first; but nothing more.Glork wrote:
No, but I'm still pretty okay with his play.JDodge wrote:
Why am I not surprised?Elmo wrote:Unvote:wank;vote:JDodge.
Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?
I'd like you to address the inconsistency pointed out in Elmo's post. Why exactly are you voting Andy and why did you say two entirely different things in different posts?-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
When do I ever give all my reasons?Glork wrote:
Why on earth would you withhold your main reason?JDodge wrote:
Why can't the two reasons co-exist? I will admit that I withheld my main reason at first; but nothing more.Glork wrote:
No, but I'm still pretty okay with his play.JDodge wrote:
Why am I not surprised?Elmo wrote:Unvote:wank;vote:JDodge.
Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?
I'd like you to address the inconsistency pointed out in Elmo's post. Why exactly are you voting Andy and why did you say two entirely different things in different posts?-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
I just tried to remember why his post felt self-preservative and managed to successfully defeat my own logic.Glork wrote:Under deadline, one would think that you'd at least give your primary reason rather than some secondary reason. In spite of your tendency not to volunteer your thoughts, I find it odd that you'd say you're voting him "based on that post" rather than because of his vote if indeed you primarily suspect him for the latter.
Actually, if the post is what prompted you to move, I'd expect you to just state "based on his earlier vote and his most recent post" which you didn't do either. And unless I missed something in the past page, you still haven't indicated why his post is A) self-preservation; or B) why that, if true, would make him more likely to be scum.
weeeeeeee
But are you saying that it's not more beneficial for scum to be self-preservative than for town?-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
I think that staying alive matters less to town than to others, yes.Glork wrote:
In this case, not really. Do you think that defending oneself is more beneficial for scum than for town?JDodge wrote:But are you saying that it's not more beneficial for scum to be self-preservative than for town?-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Possibly; I would still argue that it is evenGlork wrote:Supposing Andy is one of our power roles, do you still think it'd be more beneficial to try his hardest not to survive?morebeneficial as scum.
But since I've established that my reasoning for thinking Andy was self-preservative is crap, why are we even discussing this?-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
If you think the bandwagon is reasonless, a bandwagon that youSikario8 wrote:I misread. At first, it appeared as if you implied that the JDodge wagon was wrong or negative, but I think i get it now. You aren't fond of reasonless bandwagoning. I agree, reasonless bandwagoning is wrong.
@Jdodge: Don't you think reasonless bandwagoning is wrong?knowcould possibly lead to a lynch, why are you just letting it go and riding it?-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
What the hell? You want to deadline lynch me to appearSikario8 wrote:
I had no idea you'd actually say anything about it. You don't mind, do you? I mean, it's practically harmless and, if it does come up to something, I can easily withdraw my vote. I just...want to appear...well...JDodge wrote:
If you think the bandwagon is reasonless, a bandwagon that youSikario8 wrote:I misread. At first, it appeared as if you implied that the JDodge wagon was wrong or negative, but I think i get it now. You aren't fond of reasonless bandwagoning. I agree, reasonless bandwagoning is wrong.
@Jdodge: Don't you think reasonless bandwagoning is wrong?knowcould possibly lead to a lynch, why are you just letting it go and riding it?active.
Code: Select all
Squad 8 Of Solam
active?
Istillcan't see how no one else sees Elmo's extreme focus on getting me lynched.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
No. I'm not upset over being lynched. I'm upset over being lynched forSikario8 wrote:EBWOP
Are youJDodge wrote:
What the hell? You want to deadline lynch me to appearSikario8 wrote:
I had no idea you'd actually say anything about it. You don't mind, do you? I mean, it's practically harmless and, if it does come up to something, I can easily withdraw my vote. I just...want to appear...well...JDodge wrote:
If you think the bandwagon is reasonless, a bandwagon that youSikario8 wrote:I misread. At first, it appeared as if you implied that the JDodge wagon was wrong or negative, but I think i get it now. You aren't fond of reasonless bandwagoning. I agree, reasonless bandwagoning is wrong.
@Jdodge: Don't you think reasonless bandwagoning is wrong?knowcould possibly lead to a lynch, why are you just letting it go and riding it?active.
Code: Select all
Squad 8 Of Solam
active?
Istillcan't see how no one else sees Elmo's extreme focus on getting me lynched.honestlythis upset about being lynched?
What do you mean about Elmo? I thought he wanted a dead Shanba for Christmas.no reason whatsoever.
*sigh* as much as I feel Elmo is scum, at least hehasa reason for his vote.
Unvote, vote: Sikario
I have a feeling I know what you're going to say next, so I'll respond now; It's not OMGUS if there's a reason behind it.-
-
JDodge Accept it
-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
There's a difference between not giving reasons and openly admitting you have no reason.Elmo wrote:
yeah, because not giving reasons is scummyJDodge wrote:No. I'm not upset over being lynched. I'm upset over being lynched forno reason whatsoever.
oh wait-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
I don't think wank is scum. I'm not going to vote someone with equal votes just to save myself if I don't think said person is scum.Sikario8 wrote:To keep from being deadline lynched, couldn't you switch your vote to someone else so that they'd have as much as you?
For example:
unvote JDodge
vote wank
So now you and wank have the same amount of votes. There's only a 50% chance that you'd die.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Since it looks increasingly like I will be lynched at the end of the day, let the record state that I'm pretty sure Elmo, Glork and Patrick are scum.
If I'm wrong on Patrick, my next choice would be Shanba.
Just a few final words. Sikario looks less scummy after metagame research that dictates he always acts like a complete idiot.
Unvote, vote: Elmo-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Chalk it up to OMGUS if you want; I've given my reason for Elmo, and clearly you haven't read Patrick's posts.Glork wrote:Double OMGUS + Patrick, eh?
You should try busing Patrick instead.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Interesting; to be entirely honest, I do not feel it is OMGUS that I am using. I feel that my wagon is scum-driven based on how it materialized out of nowhere with no reason whatsoever.Andycyca wrote:Now I don't definetly like JD's reaction
UNVOTE, Vote: JDodge-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
I have no problem with your vote, or Andy's for that matter. I have a problem with Elmo's, Glork's and Sikario's votes.Ripley wrote:
You may not agree with my reasoning for voting for you but you can't claim that I didn't provide it.JDodge wrote:I feel that my wagon is scum-driven based on how it materialized out of nowhere with no reason whatsoever.-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
mmhmmmhmmm?JDodge wrote:Since it looks increasingly like I will be lynched at the end of the day, let the record state that I'm pretty sure Elmo, Glork and Patrick are scum.
If I'm wrong on Patrick, my next choice would be Shanba.
Just a few final words. Sikario looks less scummy after metagame research that dictates he always acts like a complete idiot.
Unvote, vote: Elmo
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.