Mini #509: Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers, Game Over!

[jmar]

If you think you're scum, then go ahead?

*confused*

[Mirth]

Why? Giving up?

[UltimaAvalon]

PEERS!

HAMMAH!

DO IT NAO!

[Cogito Ergo Scum]

PEERS!

HAMMAH!

DO IT NAO!

How is someone hammering himself

ever

good for the town?

[Mirth]

I have a feeling that Avalon's just being a jackass again...

[Peers]

I have a feeling that Avalon's just being a jackass again...

He stopped? I must've missed it.

[Flameaxe]

Can we avoid the "omg they are liek...being jackasses" conversation please? If you really want to argue about it, yell at your monitor as you read pages 8-12ish...

[Mirth]

Flameaxe, my comment was directed at CES, since he felt the need to ask a pointless question.

[Flameaxe]

Ok.

Also, I would like to officially smack Peers for his actions in mafia discussion. Shame on you.

[Peers]

Aw, c'mon, Flameaxe. I'm obviously not talking about this game... that other thread talked about when there's a two-week wait until deadline, not just a few days. And this isn't hte only game I'm in with the 'half votes at deadline' rule. By the time it gets enough replies for me ot get any info about it, I'll be dead in this game... won't affect my play here at all.

Besides, only way I'd self-hammer here is if you all wanted me to... and it looks like just two of you do, so, you'll have to wait to see my role.

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

Flameaxe, cut it out please.

I'm almost tempted to hammer Peers.

[Flameaxe]

Aw, c'mon, Flameaxe. I'm obviously not talking about this game... that other thread talked about when there's a two-week wait until deadline, not just a few days. And this isn't hte only game I'm in with the 'half votes at deadline' rule. By the time it gets enough replies for me ot get any info about it, I'll be dead in this game... won't affect my play here at all.

Besides, only way I'd self-hammer here is if you all wanted me to... and it looks like just two of you do, so, you'll have to wait to see my role.

I never wanted a self-hammer. If I did, I would have said so. I just have problems with people breaking site rules. Rules are rules.

@PWS: What exactly am I needed to 'cut out' here? When I see someone talking about an issue in another thread that is very similar to this game, it pisses me off. Rulebreakers deserve to be given water torture.

[petroleumjelly]

Official Day One Vote Count: #13

Peers – 6 – Mirth, originality, jmar, UltimaAvalon, Unright, Flameaxe

jmar – 3 – PlaysWithSquirrelsCogito Ergo Scum, Blight

Unright – 1 – dybeck

With

12

alive, it takes

7

to lynch!

4

to lynch at deadline, which is

tomorrow

.

Not Voting – 2 – killerbob, Peers

Sorry, had a busy weekend. killerbob has been prodded. Blight is being replaced. As for prodding "non-players", it's your job to tell Rita who is not playing, not her job to find them.

[Peers]

And still no discussion over a) who is scum if I'm scum, or b) who is scum if I'm town.

This town depresses me. And that's just based on the last couple pages, not the ugliness that went down earlier. Surely you people don't think I'm the only scum in the game?

[Mirth]

No, I have a theory about that. It involves how CES is busy defending you. It also involves the baseless wagon on Jmar.

[originality]

In before prod.

I'd love to hammer Peers already, but sadly I am currently voting for him. Someone hammer him so tomorrow comes quicker, this is accomplishing nothing and he's dead meat tomorrow anyway.

[Peers]

In before prod.

I'd love to hammer Peers already, but sadly I am currently voting for him. Someone hammer him so tomorrow comes quicker, this is accomplishing nothing and he's dead meat tomorrow anyway.

So you don't want to discuss who else might be scum, either?

[Flameaxe]

In before prod.

I'd love to hammer Peers already, but sadly I am currently voting for him. Someone hammer him so tomorrow comes quicker, this is accomplishing nothing and he's dead meat tomorrow anyway.

Unvote, Vote: Originality.

Reasons:

• Eagerness to hammer.
  
• Urging others to hammer, so 'tomorrow can come quicker'. This just doesn't sound right to me, what about you?
  
• His reason being that not hammering him isn't accomplishing anything. The longer we stay in day, the more info we receive. Very simple, really.
  
• The fact that he isn't posting that much, if anything, and comes in with 'In before prod'. This added with the rest of the post is all liek...whoazorz scumz!
  
• Last: "he's dead meat tomorrow anyway". Care to explain...a little?

[originality]

Last: "he's dead meat tomorrow anyway". Care to explain...a little?

Tomorrow is the deadline. Peers has 6 votes on him. 4 votes are required for a deadline lynch. Capisce?

So you don't want to discuss who else might be scum, either?

Sure, bring a good case against someone and discuss away. But there isn't any, because you are the scummy one here. (or did I miss something? I don't think so)
Anyone has a better case then Peers?



I was just trying to make up for my not posting by going all assertive on your asses. You guys seem to think that I should have just kept my mouth shut till tomorrow when Peers is dead. Sorry for trying to contribute, I promise not to do it again.

I kid, I kid.

[Flameaxe]

Oh ok. When people say tomorrow in games, I tend to think tomorrow as in Day 2.

2: You are basically doing the same thing as Peers right now, not coming up with any of your own cases and expecting us to do it for you. There is always a case, go back and read to strengthen your opinions on EVERYONE, not just the current target.

3: You made up your not posting by posting...nothing (essentially). Your post had no content worthwhile to what is going on, much like all of your posts today (today as in game today, wee). Saying that I think you should keep your mouth shut is dumb. I'm trying to say that you should keep your mouth open, preferably keeping important contributions flowing out towards the rest of us.

Mod: I'm aware that it is last minute, but would it be possible for the deadline to be moved back to get the replacement (for Blight) in here before night?

[originality]

Welp, about the not posting thing, I'll try to remedy that.

I admit I didn't read much of what has been going on lately, because it all seems so angry (Like, 80% of posts are some sort of personal insult or something.) The other 20% seems Peers (weakly, IMO) defending himself.
Through my skimming I saw little that was worthwhile to make me stop and think.


Did a reread, and here's the people I find scummy after Peers:

Playswithsquirrels' posting irks me.
Mirth is too serious, like she's trying too hard. I dunno, proly BS on my part here.


I know I've been criticized for being vague, but thats what I'm gonna do again. Sorry, but besides Peers there just isn't much evidence to support any serious campaign against anybody.

[Mirth]

Mirth has no sense of humor, if you haven't noticed.

Originality, your calling for a hammer kind of sets of some alarm bells in my head, but not too many, as Peers has been getting on my nerves with his bad playing.

[Flameaxe]

One with no sense of humour can not have a sense of humour...

[Peers]

Mirth has no sense of humor, if you haven't noticed.

Originality, your calling for a hammer kind of sets of some alarm bells in my head, but not too many, as Peers has been getting on my nerves with his bad playing.

I'm not the one ignoring the the last few days of being able to look for possible signs of scuminess in people other than me...

[petroleumjelly]

Mod: I'm aware that it is last minute, but would it be possible for the deadline to be moved back to get the replacement (for Blight) in here before night?

I will be gone in Philadelphia from November 8 - November 12. During that time, this game

will

be in night.

However, I will extend the deadline to November 7, 11:59 pm PST, which gives you an extra day. A further extension is not debatable.