This is for Flameaxe and Simenon and anyone else whose vocabulary isn't extense enough that they have to resort to ad hom and cursing. It's been brought up by other players in this game so I know I'm not the only one who finds is obnoxious. Thank you for your cooperation.
oh lord, now the whiners are back.
could we lynch ts and get this useless day over with.
You can lynch me, I don't care - tomorrow you'll be lynching Fonz. Along with Lemming counterclaiming cop on Day 1, and Fonz outing himself as lying scum on Day 2, and lynching a cop, nobody knows how to play this game anymore, it seems.
Actually, this is not true at all.
If The Fonz is lying, and you were a cop, then we traded a cop for a confirmed scum (not the best result, but better than average, I think). We also know that Lemming is either an honest cop or outright scum, so we have a guaranteed scum lynch tomorrow (The Fonz) if we mislynch today, and are likely to have enough information to know whether we can trust Lemming's investigations by the next day.
I'm comfortable with my vote.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
No, ZONEACE, you did not vote me, nor was I attempting to imply that you had. I was just basking in my utter immunity from being voted by you. It happens so rarely.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
you agreed that the attack on me day one was stupid, because upto the point where i was attacked i was using logical arguments. So how is it illogical to then distrust the person who attacks you after you agree with them?????
You can lynch me, I don't care - tomorrow you'll be lynching Fonz. Along with Lemming counterclaiming cop on Day 1, and Fonz outing himself as lying scum on Day 2, and lynching a cop, nobody knows how to play this game anymore, it seems.
If he's lying then we're trading an insane/paranoid cop for a scum. That works for me.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
All right. To start with, I agree that it makes sense to be skeptical of the Mason group without further evidence. But you then seemed to arbitrarily pick a side, and choose Simenon. That's reasonable, I suppose, but it's also conceivable that Simenon saw it as scum trying to be his best friend. It's a well known tactic, scum buddying up to town. If you argue that someone is suspicious simply because he votes for you, well, that's common, and it's called OMGUS.
People who agree with you may be pretending to agree with you in order to blend into town as scum. People who disagree with you may be town and honestly think you're scum, even if you've been very supportive of them. Yelling at them doesn't change their minds, usually. Reasoned arguments do. Try to look at it from the perspective of the person you're shouting at.
I think we've confirmed pretty well that the Mason group exists. Since apparently there is some question about the loyalties of people within the group, I don't think it's very relevant, except as a useful tool to sort the honest cops from the dishonest ones. Simenon and Niv were told to be suspicious, and they behaved accordingly. But when you sided against one of them, since we now can be pretty sure they WERE Masons, Simenon saw your siding with him as opportunistic (I think. I can't be certain, but that's what I took from it) and he thought it scummy.
That doesn't make him scum. It might make him wrong, but it doesn't necessarily make him scum. I hope that, despite how supportive MOS has been to you, if you thought MOS had done something scummy, you'd consider voting for him. Agreeing with you does not make someone town. Scum do that just as often, and possibly more often. Thus, arguing that because Simenon voted for you when you were on his side, therefore he must be scum, is craplogic. It doesn't clear Simenon, but it doesn't incriminate him either.
As always, correct me if I'm wrong.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
This is for Flameaxe and Simenon and anyone else whose vocabulary isn't extense enough that they have to resort to ad hom and cursing. It's been brought up by other players in this game so I know I'm not the only one who finds is obnoxious. Thank you for your cooperation.
All things considering, I think I've been quite restrained, thank you. I'd like you to point out any unprovoked ad homs (with the exception of the "zoneace is an idiot" post, which isn't an ad hom and I immediately regretted posting it). TIA
ZONEACE wrote:oh god i thought you were smarter than that.
it reads protect the tracker because lemming is naive/insane or scum and shouldn't be protected.
Well that depends on the lynch result. If TS is the godfather then Lemming is, in my opinion, a sane cop. The kills last night make no sense if they're opposing scum - one of them would be dead by now.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
HOW IS IT HARE BRAINED. its the right move if TS isn't the godfather. i guess i got a little ahead of myself in that aspect, but its FAR FROM HARE BRAINED.
I can only assess your post based on the information presented. It looked to me like you were saying the doc should take a gamble on the idea that both TS and Lemming are scum. That's the least likely scenario in my opinion. If TS isn't the GF then that's a different thing, but without that information we shouldn't be telling the doc what to do. In fact, we shouldn't be doing that regardless because it helps the scum to figure out who to kill.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
