Tbh people can call this scummy or dumb or omgus or whatever they want but I'm gonna create Hydra dissonance and say Cakez is probable scum.
> Cakez started his case on me really strong
> I get frustrated and exhibit what is apparently bad play
> He even cites an example where scum did this to him before
> His case gets weaker. Why? If he's Town, it'd get stronger because he's got a scum suspicion, who then resorted to a tactic that he knows is scummy. But then he says..."cool off you're not even my top scumread"
> He knows I'm town and he's scum
In wayb4 omgus accusations. Go and read my interactions that Cakez is disliking. Understand how actually woeful Cakez case is, then vote for Rat or Cakez.
That's just misrep
You rose points in your defense that I found acceptable (ABR stopped trolling, 100% had no content before your vote) so my scumread cooled off.
Like my behaviour apparently got much worse and I did a scumthing and Cakez EASES off the pressure. The potential wagon looks more likely and Cakez starts distancing from his case - "you're not even my top scumread".
Rat is prototypical scum going after opportunity lynch where he thinks he can just blame it on AtE afterwards.
In post 1378, SirCakez wrote:That's just misrep
You rose points in your defense that I found acceptable (ABR stopped trolling, 100% had no content before your vote) so my scumread cooled off.
In post 1379, yellowbaron wrote:Like my behaviour apparently got much worse and I did a scumthing and Cakez EASES off the pressure. The potential wagon looks more likely and Cakez starts distancing from his case - "you're not even my top scumread".
Rat is prototypical scum going after opportunity lynch where he thinks he can just blame it on AtE afterwards.
~rb
If I wanted opportunity, I'd have gone after Vedith.
Plus I've been publicly suspicious of you all game. You're just not making it any better.
In post 1379, yellowbaron wrote:Like my behaviour apparently got much worse and I did a scumthing and Cakez EASES off the pressure. The potential wagon looks more likely and Cakez starts distancing from his case - "you're not even my top scumread".
Rat is prototypical scum going after opportunity lynch where he thinks he can just blame it on AtE afterwards.
~rb
Your behavior didn't get "much worse" (aside from the toxicity which isn't a scumtell, just rude). But now you're just flinging mud.
In post 1373, Masquerade wrote:@yellow: I'm not sure on Cakes yet but I have ongoing reasons for thinking Bieberboys are town. So my answer is no.
Can you elaborate why they're town? If not here, then in the nation thread?
I am telling you in that very quote that I cannot elaborate due to ongoing reasons. To clarify: that means I have reasoning based on an ongoing game we are not allowed to talk about.
So then you're just weakly tunneling and barely contributing to the game because you've just fluffed on about stupid reasons I'm scum for pages now. The less you commit to your reads, the scummier you are tbh.
If it wasn't clear from my last post, your recent posting has completely destroyed whatever towncred you received from your responses earlier, since now you're just discrediting and AtEing.
K bye.
In post 1390, yellowbaron wrote:Cakez' scumread on me is getting weaker in contrast to other people's getting stronger (implying that my responses are actually bad/scummy) - why?
Multiple people keep pointing out my scummy responses, Cakez case gains traction and he's like "nope nope nope" all of a sudden?
~rb
You're acknowledging that your posts are scummy, yet you're calling me an opportunistic vulture for voting you?
You do have a point in that Cakez' read should not be weakening, but this doesn't add up.
Besides, if they aren't scummy, then Cakez backing off should be fine, shouldn't it? After all, wouldn't scum be MORE likely to follow the crowd's perception of scumminess?
In post 1397, Radical Rat wrote:Besides, if they aren't scummy, then Cakez backing off should be fine, shouldn't it? After all, wouldn't scum be MORE likely to follow the crowd's perception of scumminess?
Scum distance themselves when their bad cases gain traction.
They also distance themselves from 'strong' defenses against their cases because they know getting into a prolonged debate will expose the weakness of their case.