like can u explain why my read on tam is fakeThe reality is that his read on Tam is fake and he didn't have any reasons to call Tam scum-aligned, the only option he has left is to pretend like it was still a null-aligned read and jump through my hoops.
Do you think they were scum-aligned posts?In post 924, Impoetic wrote:I wasn't saying bacde would be lynchbait. I was saying he was making it easier for tam to dodge questions/twist facts and that tam was doing/would do those things
predit: they were bad
Your read on Tam is fake because you voted her even though you claimed a null-aligned read on her, then rather than you pretended as if you actually thought everyone else was town-aligned and you were voting based on process of elimination. Clearly that is fake and the way you approached it was deliberately ambiguous and scum-aligned.In post 925, Accountant wrote:like can u explain why my read on tam is fakeThe reality is that his read on Tam is fake and he didn't have any reasons to call Tam scum-aligned, the only option he has left is to pretend like it was still a null-aligned read and jump through my hoops.
i null read tam but I'm willing to lynch her because I don't really wanna lynch ayone else atm and someone has to be your buddy
Whats so fake about this chain of thought
Your read on Tam is fake because you voted her even though you claimed a null-aligned read on her, then rather than you pretended as if you actually thought everyone else was town-aligned and you were voting based on process of elimination. Clearly that is fake
Well if you made a shitty case like you actually ended up doing I wanted to make fun of it so everyone would see you're a scumlord and lynch you lmao
Why do you care about my explanation if you think I'm scum-aligned? Because you actually know that I'm town-aligned...
In post 232, evilpacman18 wrote:Check my game history. I never vote until I'm ready for the day to end.
I know people don't have him on their radar but...In post 391, evilpacman18 wrote:I'd prefer not to lynch until IAI, ira and xykfu say some more.
So, there may not be any way to defend yourself against the "perfect wordings" thing, but it is what it is.In post 642, Tam wrote:Xkfyu:
Scum
Tam - So, her second post, post 306. Remember what I said about Accountant's play style making him an easy target? I also agree with whoever it was that said everything she says is too perfect.
So, again, I'm not sure how to defend against saying the perfect things...if someone can elaborate, or maybe actually bring something up that I can answer, that would be great.
(Maybe even have an original reason why you don't like me, and not just tag on to other people's thoughts alone?) I did see you point out a specific post by me, but I don't understand what about the post you didn't like...my calling out Accountant? Someone I've never played with for acting like he normally does? I dunno. The way you worded it made me think you were suspicious of me because of something YOU said? Please elaborate.
Shit...In post 722, Trivium wrote:Failure quote but I have a point here. I see scum defending a scumpartner by making absolutely no case, but simply saying that their lynch isn't going to happen.
Did ira take over your account all of a sudden?In post 754, Trivium wrote:I'm making so much sense and you aren't doing anything to defend yourself except for claim that I'm flailing.In post 752, Bacde wrote:I don't think you understand my "are you making a town case of me" postIn post 746, Impoetic wrote:Is this a regular occurrence for you, finding all 3 scum with absolute certainty d1?In post 728, Trivium wrote:I need other people than scum to start posting again. I really do because I just found the scum team.
Because I don't quite believe it.
Also, Tam, I don't like your last post on the previous page. I think that's totally fake. Why would you "hope" your SR is innocent? Why would you be so certain now when you were wishy-washy a moment ago? Sure, this "I got both scum" gimmick is incredibly incriminating, but I don't see how that sudden conviction makes sense. Your forewarning doesn't make it any better.
Predit: Um, what? Bacde? Those last three posts were abysmal, especially when taken in conjunction to the ones you made just this page. Since when have you SR'd Tam?
I'm trying to point out to Triv that he isn't making any sense with his flailing and hoping he will cool down and come to his senses tbh
In post 931, Robbnva wrote:In post 232, evilpacman18 wrote:Check my game history. I never vote until I'm ready for the day to end.I know people don't have him on their radar but...In post 391, evilpacman18 wrote:I'd prefer not to lynch until IAI, ira and xykfu say some more.
Hey I just point out the suspicious activity. I can't really explain why scum would post that, but I can't really explain why town would either. This is part of the reason I'm not pushing anything day 1 anymore. I have trouble telling the difference between bad town doing scummy stuff and scum doing scummy stuff.In post 935, Impoetic wrote:Explain to me why you think scum would make up something like that, exactly. What's the incentive?
How is the towniness of the post dependent on Rob's flip?In post 859, Impoetic wrote:this post was really towny (unless rob flips scum I guess)In post 857, Accountant wrote:robb you and I operate on such different wavelengths that it's gonna be super hard to work with you
Bacade, you, and murder were never in my list of possible scum. If you got that impression I'm sorry.In post 943, Impoetic wrote:Well we already know there are three scum total. I remember you stating 5 different names. Which of bacde, me, Evil, Murdercat, and accountant did you decide was not scummy?
You're right. Sorry. I posted my question before I read any further.In post 939, Impoetic wrote:Predit: I already explained that in the next post