Mafia 71: The Corsican Syndicate - Game over!

theopor_COD · Post Post #450 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:38 am

Sigh . .

Waar's been banned. Seeking replacement

cicero · Post Post #451 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:41 am

Man - what is with these guys? I thought Something Awful had a rule against going to other boards and being dicks.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #452 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:44 am

theopor_COD wrote:
Sigh . .

Waar's been banned. Seeking replacement

wtf, what is the deal with the SA guys? Any reason why he was banned..

still in a reread (havent had much time to post in any of my games)...will do one here shortly.

theopor_COD · Post Post #453 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:46 am

I don't know why he was banned . . just got a PM from Mith

theopor_COD · Post Post #454 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:31 am

Albert. B. Rampage replaces Waar

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #455 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:32 am

I am now one of your own.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #456 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:37 am

Unvote, vote CKD

Overreaction!!!!! CKD is clearly scum.

skitzer · Post Post #457 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:56 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Unvote, vote CKD

Overreaction!!!!! CKD is clearly scum.

QFT.

Garnasha · Post Post #458 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:58 am

Alright, I just figured out what drop-down menu everybody was talking about. Praise

God, in whom I don't believe,

the coders for such a feature. I'm a bit inactive this week, I mainly sleep till one o'clock and watch telly. Not a good idea while in a thread like this I know... well, it should get better next week when the vacation's over.

Ps. Now I finally have the means to easily look over everything waar and CKD have been saying.

Garnasha · Post Post #459 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 9:58 am

EBWOP look over should be look up and get an overview.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #460 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:07 am

Waar was an ass but I'm much more likeable. I will continue on his campaign against CKD though, because he looks like obvious scum.

cicero · Post Post #461 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:09 am

Vote Saint Freak

I think. I can WIFOM it until the cows come home but I think I'm going to go back to basics. Vote the person who is consistently anti-town.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #462 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:30 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Unvote, vote CKD

Overreaction!!!!! CKD is clearly scum.

LOL, welcome Albert

Garnasha · Post Post #463 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:36 am

Hmm, **** slow comps, the fast one is being repaired, tomorrow it's back. I'll make my pbpa analysis of them two on that one, way easier...

ABR, I just got an idea. You suddenly feel very lyncher-like to me. Not necessarily by the way you and waar acted independently, but because you are continuing where he left off(is that the proper way to put it in english? curse language barriers).

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #464 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:44 am

I dislike how Waar played a lot(I always do) but CKD has been playing pretty scummy-like. I'll try to not tunnel-vision myself on him however, and reach a verdict on a few other players.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #465 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:45 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Unvote, vote CKD

Overreaction!!!!! CKD is clearly scum.
LOL, welcome Albert

Yo!

Garnasha · Post Post #466 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:16 am

Rampage, you already fear tunnelvision? Maybe it's me, but you're fresh into this, only way I can imagine you being tunnel-visioned already is you being linked. Alternative: you've only read that which concerned waar and decided to play like nothing changed. I'm not believing that. So as far as I can see you're linked. Or have I missed a possibility? If so, please point that possibility out to me, as I can't see it.

I've been thinking a bit about a mass roleclaim, but do we have enough active players for that? No good in mass claiming with mass meaning just half the players. And could somebody explain to me the pros and cons of a mass claim? That question prolly sounds noobish, and guess what? It is!

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #467 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:20 am

scummy as hell ^

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #468 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:21 am

However you should all take example on this stalwart young man and also refer to me as 'Rampage'.

garbagetree · Post Post #469 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:39 am

Garnasha wrote: I've been thinking a bit about a mass roleclaim, but do we have enough active players for that? No good in mass claiming with mass meaning just half the players. And could somebody explain to me the pros and cons of a mass claim? That question prolly sounds noobish, and guess what? It is!

Please tell me you aren't serious.

WomensRights · Post Post #470 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:46 am

Well...Garnasha...and I'll explain this slowly for you...but because this game is closed set up a mass role claim does absolutely no good. There might be 5 scum and 14 town. There might be 4 scum and 15 town. There might be 2 cops. THere might be no cops. There might be 8 doctors and 5 vigs and 3 SKs but guess what? We don't know. There is absolutely no way for us to tell if someone is lying or not. The scum could all claim vanilla townies - are you going to know the difference between an actual vanilla and a fake one?

So basically:
Pros for mass roleclaim: Nothing
Cons against mass roleclaim: Everything

Why would you even suggest that? Why? What possible pro-town motivation could you have?

skitzer · Post Post #471 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:53 am

She did admit that she was somewhat new.

Anyway, mass roleclaims are better for smaller stuff. Or open setups.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #472 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:55 am

She's

actually a 'he'. HOW COOL IS THAT !?

skitzer · Post Post #473 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:57 am

Argh. Must...remember...to....look...at...gender...sign...before...posting...

KilGrey · Post Post #474 (ISO) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 12:06 pm

cicero wrote:Man - what is with these guys? I thought Something Awful had a rule against going to other boards and being dicks.

Not all of us are dicks.

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Unvote, vote CKD

Overreaction!!!!! CKD is clearly scum.

Of all the different cases posted, is this really the scummiest to you?

Albert B. Rampage wrote:I dislike how Waar played a lot(I always do) but CKD has been playing pretty scummy-like. I'll try to not tunnel-vision myself on him however, and reach a verdict on a few other players.

That's pretty general. Side from over reacting what has he done that says 'scum' to you?