TylerJ - 5 (Jdodge, groinhammer, Dasquian, Rishi, Panzerjager)
ckillor - 2 (theopor_COD, TylerJ)
groinhammer - 1 (ChronX)
Not Voting - aioqwe, shaft.ed, ckillor, Max
What good does an FoS do at this point? Max has no votes on him and there's no danger of him being immediately lynched.TylerJ wrote: I find Max the most suspicious, but I won't vote for him just yet.
unvote. FoS: Max
If he had voted for Max, I would probably say nothing. I'm not super-suspicious of Max, but I understand why someone would vote for him.ChronX wrote:*imagines what Rishi would have said if Tyler had voted for Max.
or if he had voted for someone else.*
im not even on the tyler wagon. and i have been posting more content since i have come back into the gamePanzerjager wrote:I still want a claim from tyler butUnvote, Vote:Ckillor. I'm very upset with ckillor's responce to being let off the hook the last time. I think he is scum. Like, we're all busy and we all have times were their isn't much to say but we manage to post and we manage to actually post opinions. I believe he is scum trying to get by on the tyler wagon.
He wants to see Tyler perform under pressure but under the pressure of a call to role claim, he removes the pressure.panzerjager wrote:Without further ado, GH, I voted tyler because it generated almost 2 pages of conversation of Tyler under pressure. Seeing a person under pressure is key to determining if they are scum. He has not performed under pressure at all, but I've also noticed his join date, a mere two months ago. I can give him a little newbie leeway but his play reaks of unsure scum. I think I'm actually going to keep my vote here. I'm interested enough to see more from him and the one or two people who have risen quite a few alarms in regards to Tyler's pressure. That will wait for now. "Let the evidence gather
Clearly you are saying you are worried about someone else moving their vote to TylerJ and lynching him before he can claim. Now that you have moved your vote to him, it is clear that you are only interested in his claim, and not worried about someone coming in and rashly lynching a powerrole before they get a chance to claim. The wagon definitely isn't going away if you add your vote to it. Your reasoning is even further conflicting when you later state:ChronX wrote:The wagon on you isn't going away and there are a couple of players not voting whose actions, in this game and meta-wise, are not entirely predictable.
If Max and GH are still your top suspects, and you're worried about someone(s) coming along and suddenly lynching an unclaimed player on a -2 bandwagon, why are you maintaining that player at -2 and moving your vote off of one of your top suspects?ChronX wrote:My suspect list continues to be Max and GH
If you still want the claim, removing pressure will not get it. That's very self-contradictory.Panzer wrote: I still want a claim from tyler but Unvote, Vote:Ckillor
i meant that i have been posting more content than i did before the entire thing when i first came back to this game. and if people had ever actually noticed my little analysis back a page or two ago that could be thought of as content too.Panzerjager then posts a beaut, taking his vote OFF of Tyler, easing the pressure and making my roleclaim request meaningless. He pours a vote onto CK, who in 2 sentences and a pasted quote manages to contribute more to the game than he had to date ("I'm not even on the Tyler wagon" and lies ("I have been posting more content..." maybe in another thread, not this one). This fulfills shafted prophecy of the Tyler wagon losing steam, doubly since with the vote the ck one is now gaining momentum
whatever... (what attorneys would call heresay)In the same thread, he buddies up to Shafted and Dasq. Reads as sympathy plea.
There are 2 mafia and 2 members of each. We need to lynch a scum today, and or find out who is doing what in relation to bandwagons. My vote on GH was wasting its time, and is somewhat based on gut anyway. A vote on max at this time will give us some information, but I DON'T agree that we have (had) learned all we could learn from the Tyler wagon. Until we get more content from several players, including at least one ON the wagon (JDodge) we should keep the wagon in tact.If Max and GH are still your top suspects, and you're worried about someone(s) coming along and suddenly lynching an unclaimed player on a -2 bandwagon, why are you maintaining that player at -2 and moving your vote off of one of your top suspects?
QFT, anyway, I'm very much against his claim at this point. I would apperciate it if we got of of his wagon. He is quite obviously town. Kthnx.shaft.ed wrote: 2) A partially scum induced breakdown of a weak townie. As you said, with 4 scum we have to be very careful, unless we get lucky with scum crossfire and I'd rather not rely on luck.
Why is he "obviously town"? I don't like "obvious" conclusions without explanation.Panzerjager wrote: QFT, anyway, I'm very much against his claim at this point. I would apperciate it if we got of of his wagon. He is quite obviously town. Kthnx.