Mafia 70: Traditional - Game over!

[Niv]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Since when do you care what I say?[/quote]

I care what everyone says. i just generally like to point out what you say. i was hoping youn't got worse. now you have gone from accusing people w/o reasons to acusing secret people w/o reasons

[Zeppo]

Stuff about cops

Yeah that does make sense, especially the stuff about the night kill which I hadn't thought about, so

unvote

for now.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

[quote="Niv"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Since when do you care what I say?[/quote]

I care what everyone says. i just generally like to point out what you say. i was hoping youn't got worse. now you have gone from accusing people w/o reasons to acusing secret people w/o reasons [/quote]If I'm not quoting, it adresses the poster above me.

[Flare]

(PLaceholder bump)

[The Fonz]

I find it an extraordinarily useful tell, so the onus is on you (and booboo) to demonstrate why it isn't, if you don't want it used. Do you not accept that scum have reason to hide behind other people's arguments in order to cause mislynches without being too strongly associated with the lynch? In the same way I think any vote made with the justification 'we're nearing deadline and any lynch is better than none' is scummy.

Basically a person C is a bandwagoner. Ok im a bandwagoner. But so is everyone else in this game. The fact that agreeing with someone makes them mafia is ludicrous.

I've already responded to your accusations. I dont feel like looking back that far for it but i'll quote it the next you bring it up

Not quite. A person C voter is a bandwagoner who hides behind someone else's argument in doing so.

[Patrick]

Votecount

Mastermind of Sin (2) -- Flare, The Venerable Zorg
White (5) -- Niv, Sir Tornado, Yamahako, JDodge, Toaster Strudel
booboodafool (1) -- KaleiÐoscøpe
The Venerable Zorg (4) -- Beastly, Mastermind of Sin, Erg0, Aimee
Toaster Strudel (3) -- Lemming1607, Simenon, ZONEACE
Zeppo (2) -- Ether, Setael

Not Voting: Flameaxe, booboodafool, White, The Fonz, Zeppo
22 alive, 12 to lynch. 7 to lynch at deadline.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Stuff about cops

Yeah that does make sense, especially the stuff about the night kill which I hadn't thought about, so

unvote

for now.

What stuff about the night kill? Please elaborate in your own words.

No one else answer this lest I e-strangle you.

[Zeppo]

That if they actually are a cop and the scum decide to night kill them (even assuming there is no doc protection on them that would make them waste their night kill completely) then it means someone else didn't get night killed, sparing the life of a useful townie.

[Mastermind of Sin]

And if they are scum? I guess I don't see why that argument in particular made you unvote.

[Sir Tornado]

Mod, what is the lynching requirement at deadline?

[ZONEACE]

7 to lynch at deadline.

7 tornado

[Flameaxe]

That if they actually are a cop and the scum decide to night kill them (even assuming there is no doc protection on them that would make them waste their night kill completely) then it means someone else didn't get night killed, sparing the life of a useful townie.

Cop>'useful townie'.

[Zeppo]

^Having another useful townie spared is a bonus, and the clincher for me. I can see the advantage of having the two investigations whether they are true or false to work off later in the game but that alone didn't seem enough to spare a suspected scum.

[Flameaxe]

And using one night to test them, to at least prove they are scum...isn't an option?

[Mastermind of Sin]

^Having another useful townie spared is a bonus, and the clincher for me. I can see the advantage of having the two investigations whether they are true or false to work off later in the game but that alone didn't seem enough to spare a suspected scum.

Yea, I'm having trouble following this logic as well. It seems like a really weak reason for you to back off from a case that was losing ground quickly.

Unvote, Vote: Zeppo

IGMEOY: Zorg

[JDodge]

Unvote, vote: Zeppo

[Niv]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"][quote="Niv"][quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Since when do you care what I say?[/quote]

I care what everyone says. i just generally like to point out what you say. i was hoping youn't got worse. now you have gone from accusing people w/o reasons to acusing secret people w/o reasons [/quote]If I'm not quoting, it adresses the poster above me.[/quote]

Thank you

[quote="The Fonz"]Not quite. A person C voter is a bandwagoner who hides behind someone else's argument in doing so.[/quote]

i am quite sure this is the definition of a bandwagoner, therefore, I disagree with tthis logic entirely still

[quote="Zeppo"]That if they actually are a cop and the scum decide to night kill them (even assuming there is no doc protection on them that would make them waste their night kill completely) then it means someone else didn't get night killed, sparing the life of a useful townie.[/quote]

UnVote White, Vote Zeppo

Cop = extremly useful. you are saying that dead cops = good. this is just wron. This is retarded.

[quote="Zeppo"]^Having another useful townie spared is a bonus, and the clincher for me. I can see the advantage of having the two investigations whether they are true or false to work off later in the game but that alone didn't seem enough to spare a suspected scum.[/quote]

This only makes it worse

[quote="JDodge"]

Unvote, vote: Zeppo

[/quote]

@ fonzie: is this a person C vote or a bandwagon votre?

[JDodge]

It's PERSON Q

personally i feel the whole person c is scummy thing to be crap

[Simenon]

HI JDODGE


<3

[JDodge]

HI JDODGE


<3

HI SIM

[Flameaxe]

Hi Sim!

<3<3<3

Oh and

Vote: Zeppo

for reasons stated above. I fuhgot before.

[Simenon]

HI BBB








<3

[Lemming1607]

Unvote, vote: Zeppo

It's PERSON Q

personally i feel the whole person c is scummy thing to be crap

hahahahahah

[Niv]

Hi K. Didn't i start the whole saying hi to lurkers thing. you's is stellin' ma thunder

[Zeppo]

*sigh* Okay I should stop making such short, rushed posts because I am not maknig myself clear. I will now completely disregard my own advice because I have a lecture in 10 minutes.

Before I didn't have too much qualms about lynching a claimed cop I thought was scum because even if he did turn out to be pro-town I thought he would be dead by morning if we didn't lynch him because the scum would go

"Ha now we know who the cop is we can night kill him."

But now I realise it would be more like.

"Well <insert useful townie name here> is onto us and I would really like to off them so that we have a better chance of winning, but we will have to leave them alive because we are night killing that cop."

And even then they might not do that because we don't know if there is a doc in the game who would make the obvious choice of night killing the cop a little less obvious because he could be protected, which I should have thought of earlier but I am not the sharpest knife in the draw (I could actually be a spoon)