In post 1674, Lowell wrote:@zach, wrong again. alpaca is the vote here.
nah.
I agree. Vote alpaca.In post 1676, JarJarDrinks wrote:I basically have scum in this group: Lowel, Tommy, Bacd, Alpaca
In post 1678, Lowell wrote:Also pretty bold move to say there's scum in a group of 4/10 players left.
Be sure to include reasons for your vote.In post 1680, Transcend wrote:Will post more when home from work.
???????????????????????????????????????????????In post 1685, inspectorscout wrote:Why not mention you only didn't vote when the wagon was on jarjar? You were on both lynch wagons that turned out to be town, too.
Didn't have anything to say about it. I thought the JarJar wagon was weak. The Shotty and Infinity wagons were both good. Just noticed I forgot to make myself white on the last wagon though - sorry about that.In post 1685, inspectorscout wrote:Why not mention you only didn't vote when the wagon was on jarjar?
Maybe only Alpaca. Maybe Alpaca and Transcend.In post 1690, inspectorscout wrote:@Tommy who do u think was scum on that wagon? only alpaca?
This was the first time he gave an opinion of Scout or JarJar:In post 620, Lowell wrote:Done.
page 12, blue yoshi trying to pocket triv, triv not buying it
page 13, shotty obsesses over scumtells, doesn't like votes on him
page 15, tommy struggles to contribute, bacde arrives, does better
page 17, fading townread on transcend, guy looks twitchy, equivocal on votes
page 20, bacde tangles with jarjar, is town
page 22, alpaca enters w/ read list (meh), shotty debates mafia theory (meh)
page 23, big fan of transcend's 573
vote stands onshotty. he's tame as hell in ways I don't like
fos alpacaI agree with transcend that his "reads list" post was contrived garbage. this is the post lurker-scum make to look like they're paying attention ever few pages. And let me tell you, I know a thing or two about lurkerscum.
fos jarjarI'm sheeping bacde on this. Hard to put my finger on what's wrong with him, but something's just missing. Is ISO is like watching paint dry.
Strongest townreads:
bacde, who from his entry has been clear and aggressive in ways I like.
dunn, though I'm fading slightly on this one. I want to believe in the player who earned townpoints for the first dozen pages or so and not the one who has coasted since then.
transcend, up and down on him, but I like his calling out alpaca's junkposts.
Yeah, it does sound pretty bad. And then he never gives any reasons for this scum-read until challenged directly, at which point he comes out with this:In post 857, Lowell wrote:I'm okay with both lead wagons. Which even as I write it sounds scummy, but here we are. VOTE: jarjar who seems more flailing of the two.
Zach pushes him again, and he offers "It's a gut read."In post 941, Lowell wrote:That's a great question which I can't really answer. Somehow I've got it in my mind that you are, though. Am I being played or what?
When he's playing badly, it's semi-deliberate. He wants to give the impression that he doesn't care.In post 993, Lowell wrote:Might I add, alpaca saying, of me, that "he doesn't seem too concerned with acting pro town," and calling that anegative, says much more about him than me.
He follows it with some explanation, but doesn't address Trivium's town-slip, which I think is all you really need to read Trivium.In post 1357, Lowell wrote:Likewise, I'm getting a scumvibe from triv.
inspectorscout wrote: @ZACH dude...u said lowell flip should determine if im maf or not...where is the reasoning behind that? I didnt say he was scum (i put him on my list cuz everyone seems so sure) but im not certain about him being town. I think i put him at nulltown a while ago, my stance is neutral. Where am i so pro/anti-lowell that his flip will determine my alignment?
This is not OK. If you don't scumread someone or at least have a reason to, you can't just coast on being 'powertown' and flip your nullreads.In post 1695, Zachstralkita wrote:Having Lowell as a neutral read after he got L-1'd yesterday is bad, too.
We should just flip him today.
No