UltimaAvalon wrote:HAI GUYS IMMA SELF VOTE NOW CUS I'M ULTIMAAVALON
Oh wait, I lied
Vote: xyzzy
cus he's just gonna mad lurk all game anyway.
In terms of game starts, UltimaAvalon did not vote himself to start the game. Let me put it this way. As it were, UA always self-votes to start games. Therefore, we should consider this gross deviation to be a mark of scumminess, so to speak.
UltimaAvalon wrote:WHY DIDN'T ANYOUNE TELL ME AB'T A TEAM ASSHAT BOUBKA ATTACK
Unvote
Vote: Bubka
In addition to abandoning his own schtick, he has copied myself and JDodge vis-a-vis personal schticks. Ergo, he has committed a second transgression without defining any of his parameters beforehand.
UltimaAvalon wrote:It is my esteemed opinion that the Asshat bandwagon should shift over to our normal target. I repeat. All Team Asshat members should
Vote: Sir Tornado
However, here he proceeds with the Asshat schtick, as it were. He has still lacked any serious contribution to the game in terms of actual usefulness, per se.
UltimaAvalon wrote:ZOMG, why?
This post speaks for itself in terms of scumminess, so to speak.
UltimaAvalon wrote:Has it occured to you people that maybe their predictions revolve around not Digimons, and your sillieness is only helping them win?
FoS everyone who says anything about those guys digimon is kinda sorta a rip-off of
He contributes to nonsensical talk about predictions over Digimon. Let me put it this way. If Digimon were a prediction someone made, it's far too late to stop the prediction, so we should stop talking about it regardless. UltimaAvalon is begging the question here, a clear use of material fallacy, as it were.
UltimaAvalon wrote:Guys. Sir T has only posted once. Maybe he doesn't want to play. And it would be a shame if he were replaced. Lets kill him
In terms of useful contribution, this post falls behind even the most meager attempts, so to speak. According to wikipedia, UA has made an obvious attempt at tricking us with the
non sequitur
fallacy, once again presenting us with a demonstrably flawed argument.
UltimaAvalon wrote:I'm intentionally lurking. Discuss.
Also, no no on the massclaim. Just because Pie says it always works, doesn't mean its true. Hell, Pie says Pro-town Vig should kill Night 0 if possible. Shows how full of wisdom he is.
This argument is clear use of
ignoration elenchi
, or the irrelevant conclusion fallacy, as it were. Ergo, we see yet another example of UA hiding behind fallacious comments.
UltimaAvalon wrote:Why is everyone FoS'ing Flameaxe? If we all hate him so much for such an arbitrary issue, we should kill him.
Again with another fallacy, this time
affirming the consequent
. UA is full of flawed and dangerous assumptions, throwing them out to be digested by the innocent and naive townspeople of the Church.
UltimaAvalon wrote:@Stark: Your "stats" are not "stats", but "odds". "Odds" ARE NOT "statistics". "Statistics" are not derived by how likely we are to kill based on numbers, but how likely we are to kill scum based on past games. If you want to base an argument for/against massclaiming based on numbers, use "Statistics", not "Odds". Also, we can't check your work if you don't show your work. We did learn that in 2nd grade. We learned odds too. We might've learned statistics too....can't remember. that mighta been 3rd grade, when they started teaching the TAAS curiculum
@Flameaxe: Why are you so.....asshat-y?
Here UltimaAvalon uses a
proof by verbosity
to confuse the readers into thinking that Stark's theory was clearly and utterly flawed, without actually providing contribution vis-a-vis logic and reason.
UltimaAvalon wrote:I felt like I had to address both sides of the YAY MATH SUCKS argument, but couldn't think of anything else to say.
Kanaga wrote:there would be cop claims, etc. if we did have a mass claim.
What Cop Claims would there be on Day 1? Seriously, after re-reading, I don't like any of his posts, so
Vote: Kanaga
Also, Kanaga, tell your alt to post moar
This post does not really address the issue at all. It uses a
destroying the exception
fallacy to skirt the true issue Kanaga was bringing up, as it were. He then follows this flawed logic into a vote, proving again that he is acting on false premises.
UltimaAvalon wrote:I don't appreciate that snippy shot at me Seraphic, until you can prove Kakeng is my alt please don't do that
Mirth didnt say Kakeng was. I did. and then Peg did. Neither I, nor Peg, are Mirth.
Also, it was a joke.
It seems every statement I make I have to defend, and then I get voted for on the defense.
Welcome to Mafia
Once again he pulls out
irrelevant conclusion
to distract from the issue at hand, so to speak.
UltimaAvalon wrote:People don't (and shouldn't) claim cop unless they have investigations. We have had no investigations, so at this point, if we were to all massclaim today, we would have no cops claim
He finally readdresses his
fallacy of accident
from earlier, but encourages people to lie. Let me put it this way. In terms of mass claims, it cannot be useful, per se, if people have to lie about their roles, as it were.
UltimaAvalon wrote:She also changes her name....how did that happen?
UltimaAvalon wrote:EBWOP: Oops. Got SeraphicMirth confused with another person named Mirth in another game I'm in
A largely irrelevant post that merely backs him out of making a mistake.
UltimaAvalon wrote:Bubka
His scumbuddy Lazy is next
UltimaAvalon wrote:EBWOP:
Vote: bubka
Now a vote on bubka, followed by
begging the question
again, producing yet another misleading circle of logic that will keep the town in confusion.
UltimaAvalon wrote:Better question.
How can you NOT see that as a Scumbuddy connection?
In terms of fallacies, this one is my favorite. Here UltimaAvalon attempts to use
petitio principii
to lure unsuspecting people to believe his arguments.
UltimaAvalon wrote:And after you do, start placing your own vote on bubka
A post that is strangely without fallacy, since most of his contain them. Perhaps it's there and I don't "see" it, so to speak.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me put it this way, people. In terms of useful contribution, per se, vis-a-vis Prophecy mafia, UltimaAvalon has neglected to produce anything, as it were, that can be considered even close to the accepted standard we can safely establish with a broad generalization, so to speak. I don't know what your parameters are, but it's obvious to me that UltimaAvalon deserves the ultimate punishment for his crimes, per se, against the people of this town. Ergo, ipso facto, case closed. Q.E.D.
Vote: UltimaAvalon