Open 50: The New C9 - Abandoned!

[TylerJ]

Actually, I'd appreciate it if you did. Because otherwise I would be led to believe that you made it up. As a matter-of-fact The last page was probably the worst of them all, considering all of those one liners. So I am confused as to why you don't suspect me anymore.

Please, give some examples of contentless posts.

[LaptopGun]

I never said I had amazing reasons for voting for SSF. They are pretty stupid, but I am nervous that SSF is mafia. If I cant say it any clearer. I really think you guys are doing a good job getting people to talk in this thread, which is something that has been lacking in my other games. I appreciate you getting me to think more about what I believe. It is frustrating that I can't really be as active as I like to be so I am keeping up as best I can.

[Oman]

1) I never said I don't suspect you

2) I would hardly make something up that any player can go back and read for themselves.

[Gatorguy91]

Long Awated freakin' vote count

JordanA24- 3 (LML, Aimee, Oman)
Oman- 6 (AlyG, Sammich, skitzer, Manaspyrte, JordanA24, TylerJ )
SSF- 2 (Laptop Gun, OpposedForce)
Sammich- 2 (Ooba, Shteven)
Laptop Gun- 3 (SSF, White, curiouskarmadog)


With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.

[TylerJ]

Oman you have yet to provide evidence. You mad something up in an attempt to falsely corner me.

I'm sure you are scum.

[Shteven]

I'm quite unimpressed with SSF so far - I'd have expected more scumhunting. Similarly LML seems to have hidden away after a prominent opening.

I noticed this as well, but wasn't going to after LML just yet. But now on thursday, I'm getting a bit more curious as to what he thinks about:

- Jordan's wagon building up so quickly
- Jordan's wagon then stopping
- Oman picking up 6 votes

And any other observations. Are you happy with the results of Jordan's wagon or do we need to take it all the way to lynch?

[Sammich]

What happened to LML anyway?
And

Mod: Prod Aimee

If my dates are correct anyway.

[skitzer]

I think everyone is overlookng a lot. Only some of us are posting frequently (not me, I'll admit that) and this game is mostly made up of five or six people chatting animatedly. It's almost sad.

My vote stays on Oman, for now.

[TylerJ]

so why don't you contribute. Spill your brains out.

[skitzer]

I see much repititive blaming, and Oman is just digging a deeper hole.

[TylerJ]

Appearently your brain is empty. If you want this game to pick up, then you have to contribute.

[LaptopGun]

I am not really sure how to bring in more people who have been silent or lurking. I suspect more people would get involved depending on how the Day 1 vote goes. There may be other ways to find fuel for the fire. Say for example LML, if and when he decides to return. I'd really like to hear from him right about now.

skitzer, who else has been particuarly scummy for you?

[skitzer]

Sammich, if I had to pick someone. And TylerJ, but just to a little.

[ooba]

Sammich, if I had to pick someone. And TylerJ, but just to a little.

Anything to say in response to my vote on you in Pst 168? Reproduced below ..

Anyway, Oman's first post doesn't really help him any. All that concrete info in the first legit-game post is not exactly innocent-townie-ish behavior.

He isn't even stating that anything about the bandwagon - He's voting for him because of Oman's first post being big??
...
...
Skitzer has basically just joined the bandwagon giving (What in my opinion) is a very lame reason for voting .. So Vote:skitzer

[Aimee]

What happened to LML anyway?
And

Mod: Prod Aimee

If my dates are correct anyway.

/self-prod.

Re-read coming. (Hopefully by the end of the weekend, but I've written in the V/LA thread about my limited access.)

[LoudmouthLee]

Just re-read (Sorry, was getting MS Mole set up).

I'm not feeling the laptop gun wagon, and I'm not crazy about the Oman wagon. The following people kinda peaked the scum meter in the past week.

-Ooba (Posting very little content while throwing suspicion around)
-Aimee (Her callout of SSF came out of nowhere. I have seen this a million times before. It's called the

Mafia Off Voter Play.

A mafia member puts pressure out of nowhere just so, if there's the tracing of votes later on, you see that one had the vote on the other.

I have tweaked my meta read of Jordan, and I'm willing to totally wait on him, for now.

Unvote.
Vote: Aimee
FoS: SomeStrangeFlea

[Oman]

I'm not convinced on Aimee's move there as a scumtell, but I'm not calling you out on that vote at all.

[Oman]

EBWOP: Okay, I read Aimee's post and I'm still thinking its a stretch.

[LoudmouthLee]

Your opinion, and you're allowed it.

I think SSF's reaction to it sealed it for me.

[JordanA24]

Tyler: A few things:

Making a mountain out of a molehill in post 176 even after I'd explained my problem with the posts.

Okay, I say we wait till we see more evidence for or against oman. So far, we have info about what he usually does, which cause a circle of questions.

Aimee find this post scummy, and while I didn't pick up when I first read it, I can see where she is coming from.

Your horrible misrepresentation of me that I explain in post 100

pre-that you make a lot of contentless posts that are just banter, which is fine, but there is very little definativeness. You seem to ALWAYS be unsure, much like scum faking cautiousness.

Oman, I find Tyler to be far from uncertain, in fact, he's declared 2 players to be almost certain scum already (which, admittedly, quite worries me), but a couple of contentless joke posts =/= a lot of his posts are contentless.

I'm starting to think poor playing is a playstyle of Sammich's rather than a scumtell.

The problem I have with this is that, you can use this excuse in any game that Sammich is in, whenever Sammich makes a bad move, he could defend himself or you could defend him by saying "My/His mafia play isn't usually very good, so we shouldn't lynch him for just bad/scummy play, he might be town playing badly", which, if we followed this all the time, would mean he'd be hardly ever lynched, even when he's actually scum.

EBWOP: Regardless of the above (post 203) I believe I am voting Jordan and prefer it there to Tyler.

Why? You seem to have a lot more "evidence" (which admittedly I don't find very good, but if you post it, you must think it is) against Tyler.

I'm quite unimpressed with SSF so far - I'd have expected more scumhunting. Similarly LML seems to have hidden away after a prominent opening.

My last post was 2 days ago, the same length of time

your

last post was...

Posting =/= Scumhunting.

I like how SSF is called out for lurking, responds immediately and doesn't scumhunt but rather attempts to cast suspicion on Aimee.

FoS: SSF

QFT

FOS: SSF

FYI this whole thing stems from Post 49. SSF defends Jordan and says he doesn’t considers Oman ok. That struck me as covering his bases or possibly a team member or 2.

So, your reasoning for your initial vote was "SSF defended 2 people. The scumteam has 3 living members, therefore he's more likely to be scum.", correct?

What a complete and utter misrepresentation.

As far as the ssf=scum, I was just trying to be humorous.

Posting something like that is not really something to joke about. Are you backtracking here?

Oman you have yet to provide evidence. You mad something up in an attempt to falsely corner me.

Tbh, this is looking like it may be the case, which is the main reason my vote remains on him.

I'm sure you are scum.

Even though there is a lot of evidence against him, I wouldn't go that far yet.

[LaptopGun]

Finally, LML returns with content. Yeah Aimee is still a blackout for me. My wavering suspicions of SSF are what they are: something I am nevrous about. I am starting to see how retarded my fears about SSF have been, but whatever. However I agree aimee was out of nowhere, unless Aimee really puts stock in my curious notes. Oman is right, it maybe a stretch, but it is so very strange I gotta pay attention to it.

Im gonna unvote now just to try to make up my mind about somethings.

unvote SSF

.

[JordanA24]

Actually, that last post of LTG has jolted my memory of what I forgot to put in my post:

I never said I had amazing reasons for voting for SSF. They are pretty stupid, but I am nervous that SSF is mafia.

This is a classic scum way of saying "I want to put my vote on this guy, because it's a convenient place to put it, but I don't want to post any major reasoning against him, because if he ends up lynched and is revealed as town, I won't look like one of the major protagonists of the bandwagon."

I felt he was trying too hard to cling his vote onto SSF, which makes me uneasy, especially combined with the backtrack in his last post, saying his suspicions of SSF were "retarded" gives me a strong backtrack feel. I think this deserves an

FOS: LTG

[somestrangeflea]

FYI this whole thing stems from Post 49. SSF defends Jordan and says he doesn’t considers Oman ok. That struck me as covering his bases or possibly a team member or 2.

So, your reasoning for your initial vote was "SSF defended 2 people. The scumteam has 3 living members, therefore he's more likely to be scum.", correct?

What a complete and utter misrepresentation.

I actually thought that was quite a fair post. Below is the first post where LTG shows a suspicion of me...

On another note, SSF has gone ahead and offered a defense of two other players. Not scummy, but certainly interesting that we have 3 remaining mafia.

...and I feel I made an accurate representation of that.

[JordanA24]

FYI this whole thing stems from Post 49. SSF defends Jordan and says he doesn’t considers Oman ok. That struck me as covering his bases or possibly a team member or 2.

So, your reasoning for your initial vote was "SSF defended 2 people. The scumteam has 3 living members, therefore he's more likely to be scum.", correct?

What a complete and utter misrepresentation.

I actually thought that was quite a fair post. Below is the first post where LTG shows a suspicion of me...

On another note, SSF has gone ahead and offered a defense of two other players. Not scummy, but certainly interesting that we have 3 remaining mafia.

...and I feel I made an accurate representation of that.

Sorry, my mistake.

[skitzer]

Sammich, if I had to pick someone. And TylerJ, but just to a little.

Anything to say in response to my vote on you in Pst 168? Reproduced below ..

Anyway, Oman's first post doesn't really help him any. All that concrete info in the first legit-game post is not exactly innocent-townie-ish behavior.

He isn't even stating that anything about the bandwagon - He's voting for him because of Oman's first post being big??
...
...
Skitzer has basically just joined the bandwagon giving (What in my opinion) is a very lame reason for voting .. So Vote:skitzer

\

I thought it was a very logical reason.