I agree.
It's not relevant to the game.
In post 1875, KuroiXHF wrote:
I agree.
It's not relevant to the game.
In post 1878, Killthestory wrote:In post 1875, KuroiXHF wrote:
I agree.
It's not relevant to the game.
You are lead wagon with 5 votes, 9 to lynch.
What Akers this funny?
In post 1876, DrippingGoofball wrote:Let's lynch Yume and save the mod some work.
In post 1885, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:In post 1876, DrippingGoofball wrote:Let's lynch Yume and save the mod some work.
The case here is about as good as the case was on Snarky. As in, terribad. Yume and Guy are being replaced, and certainly in Guy's case its implausible anyone can read his slot as anything.
iraonavp changing vote on a whim is interesting: am I not scummy any more? Frag is likely scum, but you only vote him now because?
(Hectic day at work, will try to catch up in full later this evening)
In post 1884, Aristophanes wrote:What Akers this funny?
I don't get it.
In post 1885, KickAssAndGiggle wrote:The case here is about as good as the case was on Snarky. As in, terribad. Yume and Guy are being replaced, and certainly in Guy's case its implausible anyone can read his slot as anything.
In post 1853, Aristophanes wrote:Ah, but Guy is not a Repeat Replacement yet.
Slandarr, have you seriously not noticed this trend? I realize it's not good scumhunting, as it is possible as either alignment. However, it is notable.
I'll like a couple games momentarily.
I'll also quote myself not tunneling or whatever you accused me of before and then didn't push me to follow up on.
Performer, do you think your plan pushes out too many claims? It's possible we screw ourselves this way, so I'm a bit wary of it.
In post 1859, Something_Smart wrote:@Ari: it's just that I know you and you don't seem the type to push lurkers for lurking, and your posts also feel like you're being unnecessary hostile and discredit-y. It's a bit hard to explain. I kind of see where you're coming from on Slandaar, it's just I've had him as town all game and I think it's a comparatively weak case compared to the case on Fragger or Fire.
@Kuroi: no it's not that. I just don't see a lot of town motivation in your posts, and 1817 and 1819 feel forced. Really you're as close to a true null as I have, but if I had to lean one way it would be scum.
In post 1860, KuroiXHF wrote:Yeah. I don't like it when I play cautiously, either.
In post 1869, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 1850, Performer wrote:The issue I have with the argument of repeat replacements being scum, is that any alignment can do that, not just scum. Considering the state we’re in, I’d say this situation is great for scum and I’m still not seeing enough advancement in this phase, so for Guy & Yume slots to be replaced…I’m still thinking that’s town laziness rather than scum replace out. I didn’t expect the Yume slot to replace out again (Jam, then Yume, who knows who’s coming in for Yume).
Nope
Lurking is scummy
This level of lurking sure is
In post 1871, Aristophanes wrote:ery different.In post 1870, KuroiXHF wrote:Yume's not lurking. Yume's completely absent.
I find DGB pursuing this interesting though.
In post 1872, Fraggernaut wrote:Yume is being replaced along side Guy. The only time I seen a mafia replacement replace this many times was the last game I modded where I had to replace the same scum slot two times before pisskop finally filled in.
In post 1884, Aristophanes wrote:What Akers this funny?
I don't get it.