Mini 1787: Peruvian Nightclub Mafia (Game End!)
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 89, xyzzy wrote:here are some thoughts going through the thread post by post:
4: basically my thoughts on the "this isn't an rvs vote" line are that they're either 1)a deliberate pattern that serves some purpose unknown to the rest of us or 2)a totally meaningless thing that has no intent behind it. the former seems like slight scum behavior whereas the latter would be very slight town behavior.
12: I'm getting town vibes from this--not voting during RVS isn't inherently bad, and there's at least enough content to this post to generate discussion. doing things that generate discussion early on is good and pro-town, and that's what this post does.
29: this is a good post and I feel good about iraonavp.
34: I can't believe I misspelled "Dunnstral". anyway, this was basically an attempt to ask Dunnstral whether his posts had any specific meaning without going too far into detail about what things I think that meaning might be.
38: I don't agree with the sentiment that someone's comfort level can function as a tell with any real level of precision; there are probably just as many people who do exactly the opposite as scum.
40: this was me trying to ask the same question as #34 but in a more specific manner, seeking a specific answer.
41: not directly answering a question like this feels like it could be a sign that you're trying to avoid any really specific discussion, which would be bad. on the other hand, the fact that your reply was just 3 minutes after my post is a good sign; that seems to point away from the idea that you might be acting super deliberately at this point. I think after giving it more thought I feel like this is probably a town read (although that's also influenced by stuff from later in the thread, I guess, but whatever)
46: I don't like having a vote with the implication that there's meaning behind it without going into that reasoning at all; that said, Tyler's post #50 is substantial enough that I'm fine with the lowish level of detail here.
55: this post says some worthwhile things, but I'm not sure how to feel about Keyser overall yet. also, nice gifs.
59: this post is really incoherent, but that's my cat's fault for waking me up at 4:30 am.
62: this is a good post and I trust Tyler so far.
66: I don't particularly agree with you regarding your original vote, but I like the reasoning you give for it here.
70: this is the first post from Zachstralkita that I think actually says anything significant; the rest of his posts before this one have a really low signal:noise ratio.
77: why the unvote?
81: I think I answered your question here substantially enough earlier in this post, so I'm just acknowledging your line of questioning here.
87: you're one to talk; I'd say Dunnstral is one of the better players in this regard.
---
Tyler is the player I'm getting the strongest town vibes from. Dunnstral, if your opinion of Keyser changes at any point, I'm definitely interested in knowing that. Zachstralkita has managed to talk a lot while saying very little, and I really don't like that.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Zachstralkita
Can you use thetag next time because this post is pretty hard to follow and I don't want your thoughts to go to waste :CCode: Select all
[post]number[/post]
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
I was at the bottom of page 3 so no.
But basically we have the same reasoning, I feel as though Jack has been trying too hard to look town and I don't see a lot of purpose in his posts.-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
I am all caught up and would prefer if you revote Jaack-
-
Floof Townie
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 192, heuristically_alone wrote:VOTE: Zachstralkita
Your first post and post 122 have been the 2 worst posts of the entire game. And in general you got more talk than game.
zach is one of my town reads so I will leave my vote here.-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 354, Keyser Söze wrote:Do you see this "trying too hard to look town" / lack of "purpose" in Jaack's recent posts?
His recent posts where pretty good, I liked how our reads matched. That means that we are on the same wave length which indicates we are both town.
In post 354, Keyser Söze wrote:I presume your original vote was an activity vote, but then it developed into a scum-read vote when he voted your town-read, Zachstralkita - I'd be very interested in your latest individual reads of both Zachstralkita and heuristically_alone.
You are correct about the original vote.
I am still scum reading H_A and I am still town reading Zach though.-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 294, Keyser Söze wrote:Can I have a supporting reason (highlight the town-indicative posts) - I'm reading Zachstralkita as null so far (I do not feel like he has made a move - he has been character posting):
There is a lot of tonal things coming out of the slot that I like. I felt consistency and I am not really feeling a scum agenda as well. It isn't about the actions he is taking it is more about how he is preforming them I guess. It is hard to explain exactly how I feel about him.-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 372, Dunnstral wrote:In post 369, Floof wrote:I'd be willing to vote H_A or Iran I am going to wait though before I vote again.
But why are you willing to vote H_A?
Also Jake what do you think about H_A?
He was dodging the game and his only post was a vote on my town read. I think he was just following bandwagons at the time which is scummy. I am pretty confident he will flip scum at this point to be honest.
VOTE: H_A-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 375, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 373, Floof wrote:He was dodging the game and his only post was a vote on my town read. I think he was just following bandwagons at the time which is scummy. I am pretty confident he will flip scum at this point to be honest.
How could he be following bandwagons when he didn't really join a bandwagon?
The consensus at the time was Jake was scum/null I thought-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
In post 450, Zachstralkita wrote:why is HA a better lynch than me?
Hey guys just want to say scum doesn't say this.-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
-
-
Floof Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 50
- Joined: April 22, 2016
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.