Care to explain why?skitzer wrote:Reason 2, Day 1 bandwagons are bad. Pure and simple.
skitzer- 2 (ChocolateAttack, theopor_COD)
somestrangeflea- 2 (cicero, Jester)
shaka!!-1 (Skitzer)
Not voting (4): Gorgon, Kakeng, pwayne66, Skruffs
7 to lynch
Care to explain why?skitzer wrote:Reason 2, Day 1 bandwagons are bad. Pure and simple.
Because every time town goes to lynch someone, someone else goes "you are lynch happy!! you must be the scum!!"theopor_COD wrote:Yeh like you said that before that's why I was confused. Bleh I ought to go back and review some things.
Someone elsewhere said long days = bad for the town. I'm starting to agree. Short days = bad. Long Days = bad. Why can't we have a middlish day for once. There's just too much crap to read.
Normally one wouldn't ask others to apply pressure... one would simply take the initiative and apply some pressure.Skruffs wrote:err.. wha. God, you get hit by ONE tree branch and you forget everything.
How about instead of targetting weak or lurking players, we target someone who is smarter, stronger-personalitied, and capable of actually defending themselves? The point of bandwagons is to get information. A smart playe will give us mroe information than a quiet one. And weak scum will show their cards and have the tables turned on them.
Has Gorgon or PWayne received any pressure at all yet today? Chocolate Attack? Shaka?
Ok! here let explain my playing style, i tend to make many posts at the same time because i don't play alot. I only play one a day or one every 2 days or sometime more depend the flexibily of my schedule. And when i come to play, there are piles of posts i needed to read in other to catch up with the game and i make my post separate so it less confusion, for you as well as for me.skitzer wrote:I was dictating that the game was dysfunctional because of all the replacements. Now that replacing has calmed down, it's pretty straightforward
Also, I want to mention that I felt the lurkers were those who posted very rarely. I noticed that you post in strings, which is very strange. Others just post in one big post. Its like for you, each sepearte subject needs a post.
FoS: ChocolateAttack
You not stir up a dicussion rather a confusion. For each of the names you listed, you needed more concrete evidence showing they need a bandwagon or pressure. Also, you posts are reason-less which make you not contribute anything instead of creating confusion.Skruffs wrote:Interesting.
Guppy plays badly, and some people suggest he is too bad a player to be scum, and give him a pass.
Then I replace in, stir up discussion,and now, people start saying they want day to end and start putting votes on me for not, apparently, bandwagoning enough.
I will indulge white's request that I start voting more. He's slipped under the radar and is now getting itchy to get to night. Time to see why he's so cocky.
Unvote, vote: white