Mr. Mean 1 (White)
Neraren 1 (d3sisted)
Not Voting 8 (you all know who you are)
10 alive, 6 to lynch.
Can you link us the game?competentpsycho wrote:Ok, so last game I played I was scum with White. He acted EXACTLY the same as he is now, which made me suspicious of him. I then went and searched out his other games and it seems he acts this way when scum and not as townie. Specifically, I have seen the giving an ultimatum before rather than hammering in the hopes that someone else will hammer to take suspicion off of him.
FOS: White
You forget bussing scum.competentpsycho wrote: Since we need 6 votes to lynch and there is only 7 townies left... that means we basically need 6 of 7 townies to vote on a scum, since I doubt any scum will vote for their scumbuddies, unless they are going to sacrifice one, but we would have to have a bandwagon on one to get them to do that anyway. We NEED to make sure we have the right guy this time.
QFT. At a first read this set of some scum-alarms in my head. However on a reread I think he may be insinuating that the fact you and max haven't been bumped off in the night point to the fact you are scum.White wrote:Why does this sound insincere?skitzer wrote:No kidding. What a shocker. I thought it would be you or Max, since they have had prominent roles in this game.
You have been lurking. The reason lurking is scummy is because you're not helping the town. More like the enemy of my enemy is my friend. You're not the enemy of my enemy so you're not my friend. You could also say it as you're not being protown and the absence of protown = anti town. Anti town is most of the time called scummy.Mean wrote:Some people say that I have been lurking alot so I must be scum. I am lurking because it is my first game and I don't know why lurking would make me a scum.
If you don't think i'm scum, why'd you vote me and try to drum up other people's votes on me?Mean wrote:Secondly, I voted for white day one. I don't think that he is scum.
Sorry about that.Mean wrote:I think he was just a litlle to vocal for my taste and scared me off a bit.
Ok, your post has been good all except that it's missing one thing. Reasoning behind it. Back up your statements with examples of where they did this, break it apart like i'm doing by using the quote tags. Tell us why you find him suspicious, show us where you found him suspicious. Present cases. It's vital.Mean wrote:Finally, I would like to share my vote. vote: competentpsycho I realy don't have any other suspitions but him right now.
*pulls hair out* DUDE!!!! You should SO know better than to point out what may be breadcrumbing. Why in the HELL are you trying to direct the scum to a breadcrumbing power role?! You doofus!Max wrote:Is he bread crumbing.
Because i'm loud and make noise. Which means if I actually pick up on scum today i'll be loud and generally be a pest. And on the unlucky chance i'm in a good mood i'll present a case. Or many cases. But I will be agressive and scum don't like agressive people.Max wrote:I can't understand why scum would want White dead either he's contributing
Actually the general concensus from "most people" is that i'm scum or pesky. Obviously I can't be scum in every game so I just take it that i'm pesky.Max wrote:Most people can't get a read on him, he's unreadable of another extreme and I thought I was unreadable. If anyone tries to get a lynch on white they're most probably scum, In this rare instance I have trust in another player the unreadability is not bad.
Are you pushing for a bandwagon? That's not very good-looking. We should sniff em out before we immediately go bandwagoning.competentpsycho wrote:Since we need 6 votes to lynch and there is only 7 townies left... that means we basically need 6 of 7 townies to vote on a scum, since I doubt any scum will vote for their scumbuddies, unless they are going to sacrifice one, but we would have to have a bandwagon on one to get them to do that anyway. We NEED to make sure we have the right guy this time.
I guess this would be part of my reasoning, he might think that if he can start a bangwagon vote he can influence it, and direct suspiction away from him.skitzer wrote:Are you pushing for a bandwagon? That's not very good-looking. We should sniff em out before we immediately go bandwagoning.competentpsycho wrote:Since we need 6 votes to lynch and there is only 7 townies left... that means we basically need 6 of 7 townies to vote on a scum, since I doubt any scum will vote for their scumbuddies, unless they are going to sacrifice one, but we would have to have a bandwagon on one to get them to do that anyway. We NEED to make sure we have the right guy this time.
Vote: competentpsycho
Surely this means we can't trust you! So we should ignore that post. Which means that we can trust you! So we shouldn't ignore that post. Which means....White wrote:Obviously I can't be scum in every game so I just take it that i'm pesky.
Just so you know, trusting someone that you don't have a read on is almost as bad as trusting someone you have a scum read on. Don't trust someone ever in this game. But if you are going to trust someone, trust someone you're getting townie vibes from. Not an unreadable.
Being serious now, I didn't like this post. I really don't think that a townie needs to post saying "anyone trying to lynch me is automatically scum." And of course if you were right (which I don't think you are), it just begs the question of why didn't the scum night kill you?White wrote: In addition, from your perspective, Max, that if anyone goes and tries to get me lynched you'll see them as scum, that is exactly why scum would want to nk me. So that they can have me dead without the suspicion of a lynch.