Prophecy Mafia - Over

[curiouskarmadog]

I'm here. Just chillin'.

Haven't been terribly impressed with any of the cases so far. Carry on.

=posting to make it look like I am contributing.

not impressed with a case?..make one

unvote vote lowell

[Kakeng]

Active lurking :

Unvote Vote Lowell

Please speak up (not that i contributed much)

[Tarhalindur]

I'm here. Just chillin'.

Haven't been terribly impressed with any of the cases so far. Carry on.

This kind of post = scumtell. (Scum tend to care that they are lurking more than town does.)

Unvote, Vote: Lowell

[Lazy]

I'm here. Just chillin'.

Haven't been terribly impressed with any of the cases so far. Carry on.

Jolly good.

We shall carry on and forget about you. Except for...oh wait!

[bubka]

I don't think it is so clear that lowel is lurking though. I myself often think that way, looking for mistakes as others rant on.

[Flameaxe]

From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.

[curiouskarmadog]

I don't think it is so clear that lowel is lurking though. I myself often think that way, looking for mistakes as others rant on.

wow...might have to quote this post later in the game

[Oman]

Lowell lurking is no big tell.

[foolinc]

From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.

If this is the case then..

Lowell lurking is no big tell.

[Lowell]

Lowell lurking is no big tell.

Agreed.

[Oman]

Lowell posting!?! NOW THATS A TELL! okay, thats a joke.

[pickemgenius]

yarly,

Lowell always fucking lurks.

I mean in one game i've played with him he lurked, dropped the casual hammer, and was town that game.

so bascially... lurking isn't telling us shit about Lowell.

[Kakeng]

So,

Unvote

[Flameaxe]

From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.

If this is the case then..

Lowell lurking is no big tell.

That was my point.

[foolinc]

From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.

If this is the case then..

Lowell lurking is no big tell.

That was my point.

As it was mine. I just posted it differently.

[Flameaxe]

Gotcha.

[death_omen]

Sorry about my absence but since this is my first 12+ player game how many consective votes does there have to be against one player to have it considered at a bandwagon because it seems to be going on a lot lately. But i think lurking

alone

isnt enough reason to go after anyone.

[Kanaga]

I'm not sure if you can lay down a solid number of votes for a bandwagon, but I think that one a person gets 5 votes it's a bandwagon.

I didn't like that post at all, death_omen. You basically repeated what 3 people had just said and asked a question. No vote, no FOS, no suspicions, nothing. Just a repeated opinion. Try contributing to the game.

[Flameaxe]

<2 Votes: Just 1 or two votes
>3 Votes: Official bandwagon status.

Thats my rule of thumb for all games. Of course the size of the bandwagon that will really start to draw attention, and possibly be criticized, changes between games. Your thoughts of 5 seem about right, maybe a bit more, depending on the basis of the bandwagon.

Yarr.

[Lazy]

I don't think it is so clear that lowel is lurking though. I myself often think that way, looking for mistakes as others rant on.

Isn't it 100% clear that Lowell IS lurking?

Unvote

Vote: bubka

[death_omen]

I'm not sure if you can lay down a solid number of votes for a bandwagon, but I think that one a person gets 5 votes it's a bandwagon.

I didn't like that post at all, death_omen. You basically repeated what 3 people had just said and asked a question. No vote, no FOS, no suspicions, nothing. Just a repeated opinion. Try contributing to the game.

Im not quite sure

where

i can contribute because as i mentioned the fact that Lowell is lurking is enough to warrant him with a vote atm I dont have any particular people in mind, will try get a closer read soon.

[Kanaga]

I'm going to

Vote: death_omen

. His three posts:

91: He votes Tarhalindur for being on the Lazy wagon and says that people are making "making something from nothing" with the Lazy wagon. Well obviously, it was a early game non-serious bandwagon.

118: Unvotes, says we need to stop our "emontional backchat" and get discussing. That isn't any content, and considering he only has 3 posts in the game now, telling people to discuss is hypocritical. He also says we need to discuss who our suspects are. He didn't list a suspect in posts 118 and 216 and unvoted his suspect in this very post, so that's also hypocritical.

216: I discussed this earlier. Repeats opinions and asks a question. Basically useless post.

He has said sorry for being inactive twice. Until you do something and stop lurking d_o, I think that going after you IS a good reason to go after you. I'm fine with someone being quiet and then contributing large opinion and analysis posts when they post. But that isn't what you are doing.

[Kanaga]

EBWOP: That would be "lurking IS a good reason to go after you". As a response to his post just now: stop stalling.

[bubka]

I don't think it is so clear that lowel is lurking though. I myself often think that way, looking for mistakes as others rant on.

Isn't it 100% clear that Lowell IS lurking?

Unvote

Vote: bubka

hey, I abstained from voting on you earlier, why are you after me now?

[Oman]

Unvote vote Bubka FoS: Lazy

WTF!?