Tornado: I was kind of hoping that you'd vote someone
else
. (In my eyes, there's not really a difference between self-voting and not voting at all, although self-voting does
look
a bit stupider.)
I have no complaints about the Zorgwagon, and I'll happily join it if we can push it up to something respectable. Please also consider Setael, Flare, Lemming, Zeppo, blah blah blah.
Post 654, Ether wrote:Post 635, White wrote:No, I don't think 5 scum are pushing for my wagon. But i'm almost 100% positive that there is ATLEAST 1.
You don't really give off a scumhunting vibe. It's a bit of OMGUS and yelling at groups of people and noncommittal lurkerhunting.
Post 611, Ether wrote:This has been answered already.
Post 611, Ether wrote:It's Flare's context; please read between the lines. A terse "just curious" after to an aggressive question implying that I'm craplogical isn't a friendly theoretical exchange.
You appear to avoid relevant details and and be scum with Flare. For example, by focusing on Niv and WIFOM, you avoided following up on the scummy contradictions of Flare in your post 612 at all. That one's a double-whammy.
You also have a decently-sized bandwagon.
Post 707, White wrote:aka, I agree with you that Flare is looking for nonexistent cases.
Too uncommittal to give you any points. Then you immediately changed the subject and have refused to speak of Flare since.
Post 707, White wrote: No, it wouldn't. Ex. Zorg votes MoS for claiming cop in an open game with no cop. MoS defends himself by saying he is indeed cop. MoS get's wagoned and lynched and revealed as scum. I don't see any WIFOM in there. Another ex? Sure! I vote Niv for claiming mason with Sim (refer to early this game). Niv defends himself saying he really thought Sim was scum due to a misunderstanding of flavor in their role pms. WIFOM? Nope, none there either.
In fact, both of those examples fall into WIFOM. That said, I can see this going the pointless way of you and Tornado, and you already ceded in
576 that I believed what I was saying about him. I'd like to leave it at that unless Niv gets strung up.
Post 707, White wrote:Uh...no! Are you even reading my posts? I didn't (for obvious reasons) pur up a case for Flare being scum when analyzing you. Why would I? That makes no sense!
Analyzing me is obviously not the only thing you've been doing, nor should it be. Your conversation with me does not prevent you from analyzing other people who you've half-heartedly called scummy. They might, y'know, be scum.
Post 707, White wrote:OMGUSy pseudolurkerhate eh? I think you need to reread the game Ether. I always hate lurkers, it's not fake at all. Meta me, I dare you. It's not OMGUS either but I can see where you would think it is
Um. I'm not disputing your metagame at all. You were displaying a double-standard against those on your wagon. (There are lurkers off of it.) While I can understand this as well, you can't seriously call a thorough Flareanalysis "deflection" and not this.
Post 683, Setael wrote:Wow. "Misrepresentative lie that blatantly ignores" is pretty harsh. Are you trying to make me look suspicious or something?
I'm actually trying to work up the confidence to ask you out for scones.
Post 683, Setael wrote:Upon rereading it I can see that you didn't actually approve of outing another mason, you just said you would approve outing another mason if it would clear up this mess. I apologize for misunderstanding. I did not lie nor did I blatantly ignore your actual meaning.
See...I'm not seeing how you could drag your eyes through 11 words and not be capable of finishing the last 4 words of the sentence. Let alone the paragraph.
Generally, when someone says something scummy, you're supposed to take a
closer
look at the post.
Post 683, Setael wrote:And for the record, I still think it's scummy that you would approve outing another mason if you thought it would clear up this mess.
Uh...why?
Post 683, Setael wrote:Yes they are when there are 3 other people who could claim to confirm them. Pressuring them further is pressuring the other masons to claim. Also, why vote to lynch them when if they are telling the truth the scum will be motivated to NK them?
The alignments of the masons are not confirmed. Both Niv and Colin have been perfectly clear on that point.
Post 683, Setael wrote:You are awfully touchy. You get 2 bonus points for having the self control to not vote me inspite of this newfound resentment.
Hey...if anyone's still reading this post, could it proxy its vote to me for a second?
