Yes. I know. I read it.Sudo_Nym wrote:Did you even read the post in which I said that? If you did, you would have noticed that immediately afterwards,in the very same postI dismissed as being a bad idea. Okay, so maybe I delved into game theory instead of realistic behavior, and the result was a scummy statement; I grant that.
That's my point, I don't care that you dismissed it as a bad idea. You put it out there that you could lynch him. You didn't stand by it. You were fishing for a bandwagon against a potential power-role, testing the water to see if anyone else felt like lynching him, under the guise of some shaky "theory".
Except we haven't, really. This is the first time I've actually managed to hold you to your bandwagon since I replaced in. Your first response was to refuse to play ball and lurk for a week. I'll grant you that my case isn't getting the attention I'd like, and I'm not going to bang this drum for much longer if it's clear there's no interest in it, butSudo_Nym wrote:However, we've hashed this over a dozen times already, and everybody but yourself has decided to let it go.
that's what I'm trying to get
by stating my case explicitly. If people aren't interested, I'm not going to mount a one-man lynch mission.Blah blah, melodrama, etc.Sudo_Nym wrote:Is there something here that you refuse to understand? I get the feeling that it's gone beyond attempted scum-hunting; now you're just being deliberately unhelpful. But then, there's every chance I wouldn't be so annoyed if you were attacking somebody else.
Note: you
still
aren't contributing to this game beyond reacting to me. If I'm being unhelpful attacking you, you're being even less helpful by having no presence in the game beyond my "unhelpful" attack.
