Mini #509: Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers, Game Over!

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

If you look at what's actually been revealed, it's that two people accidentally revealed that they weren't townies, and then partially or completely backtracked to cover their error.

Not townie != power role.

Not townie = power role OR scum.

I hugely doubt that both of these players are power roles. The fact that they're now both backtracking, to a lesser or greater extent, makes these two worthy of further investigation.

Your attempt to derail this line of enquiry has been noted.

Dear sir, I have made note of your douche-baggery. Don't let it happen again.

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

So... like... vote JMar and stuff.

[Unright]

So... like... vote JMar and stuff.

*checks back for reason*

For lurking in plain sight? That's.... a little weak. Plus he's posted a bunch since then.

But a bandwagon would wake this game up a little. So, why not.

vote: JMar

[originality]

Meh, why not, I havn't done anything yet.

vote jmar

.

[dybeck]

That's reassured me of Unright's pro-town credentials.

[originality]

Oh crap, I didn't see he already had two votes on him.

unvote

[Mirth]

I do not like this wagon hopping one bit. I also think Playswith's case is awful, so, for now,

vote: Playswithsquirrels

until he explains his last post.

Mod: can we have a vote count?

[petroleumjelly]

"You galumphing dunderheads!" Rita shouts. "Where do you come off asking

me

for vote counts?" She points her staff at the wall, and after a mighty flash, emblazoned there is:

Official Day One Vote Count: #7

jmar – 3 – PlaysWithSquirrels, Blight, Unright

Peers – 2 – UltimaAvalon, Cogito Ergo Scum
UltimaAvalon – 2 – Flameaxe, Peers

Blight – 1 – killerbob
Cogito Ergo Scum – 1 – jmar
PlaysWithSquirrels – 1 – Mirth
Unright – 1 – dybeck

With

12

alive, it takes

7

to lynch!

Not Voting – 1 – originality

[Unright]

That's reassured me of Unright's pro-town credentials.

Good to know. You've yet to reassure me of yours.

[Mirth]

Thanks, Jelly.

Yup, just as I thought, Unright *is* wagon-jumping afterall. I wasn't too sure what number vote he was on Jmar before

So...since I'm still waiting for Playswith to talk, I'm only going to throw an FOS your way, Unright.

[UltimaAvalon]

Hi guys.

Am I the only one who finds Originality's refusal to do anything remotely related to anything that might be considered a bandwagon a tad bit suspicious? Cus he's been doing that all game.

[Unright]

Yup, just as I thought, Unright *is* wagon-jumping afterall. I wasn't too sure what number vote he was on Jmar before

Uh.. Yeah, I mentioned I was bandwagonning in my post. I realize that it's not a UA first day bandwagon, but keep in mind that the game went 24hours without anybody posting between PWS's two posts. Discussion is always better than silence and if my action leads to discussion than I don't regret doing so.

So...since I'm still waiting for Playswith to talk, I'm only going to throw an FOS your way, Unright.

That's fine. But why aren't you commenting on Originality's "Oh shit I'm suspiciously forth I better unvote" move?

[Flameaxe]

Meh, why not, I havn't done anything yet.

vote jmar

.

This isn't a good thing on page 8...you start doing things on liek...page 2, at the latest.

Unvote

for being a useless vote that has no current meaning.

[killerbob]

Hi guys.

Am I the only one who finds Originality's refusal to do anything remotely related to anything that might be considered a bandwagon a tad bit suspicious? Cus he's been doing that all game.

No, I noticed that too. Especially since he jumped right on,

Meh, why not, I havn't done anything yet.

vote jmar

.

then 4 minutes later...

Oh crap, I didn't see he already had two votes on him.

unvote

with only, what you thought was 2 votes in a 7 vote lynch (It was actually 3). I mean, 3 votes is not going to kill jmar. Yeah it would have been actually putting him over 50% but no scum will quicklynch with L-3 unless they have a death wish.

Unvote, Vote: originality

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

I do not like this wagon hopping one bit. I also think Playswith's case is awful, so, for now,

vote: Playswithsquirrels

until he explains his last post.

Mod: can we have a vote count?

Nobody posted for a day and a half so I just restated my opinion to bump the thread. Is that ok with you?

[Mirth]

That's fine. But why aren't you commenting on Originality's "Oh shit I'm suspiciously forth I better unvote" move?

Because I don't find it suspicious. I'm inclined to think that avoiding baseless bandwagons is a good thing, and the unvote gives Originality brownie points in my opinion. Bob (and the rest of you), I don't see your logic in suspecting anyone from avoiding a totally unfounded bandwagon. I do, however, fail to understand why Originality voted Jmar in the first place, as I think the "OMG! You're lurking in plain sight!" argument is a poor basis for anything, expecially day 1.

PlaysWith, I'm going to keep my vote on you for the time being.

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

That's fine. But why aren't you commenting on Originality's "Oh shit I'm suspiciously forth I better unvote" move?

Because I don't find it suspicious. I'm inclined to think that avoiding baseless bandwagons is a good thing, and the unvote gives Originality brownie points in my opinion. Bob (and the rest of you), I don't see your logic in suspecting anyone from avoiding a totally unfounded bandwagon. I do, however, fail to understand why Originality voted Jmar in the first place, as I think the "OMG! You're lurking in plain sight!" argument is a poor basis for anything, expecially day 1.

PlaysWith, I'm going to keep my vote on you for the time being.

You may not agree with the vote, but do you agree that JMar hasn't said anything of worth all game?

[Mirth]

I do agree that Jmar hasn't said anything particularly useful, yes. Neither have a couple other people.

[Flameaxe]

'anything particularly useful'

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

I do agree that Jmar hasn't said anything particularly useful, yes. Neither have a couple other people.

So at least we agree on that. It's page eight. He's had plenty of time to say SOMETHING meaningful. He hasn't. I don't understand why you're voting for me when you agree with my evaluation of JMar.

(JMar, if you're reading this, now would be a great time to post something about your suspicions or the like)

[dybeck]

That's reassured me of Unright's pro-town credentials.

Good to know. You've yet to reassure me of yours.

It was sarcasm. The fact that you jumped on the first passing bandwagon with such relish was not, amazingly, a strong town tell.

[PlaysWithSquirrels]

That's reassured me of Unright's pro-town credentials.

Good to know. You've yet to reassure me of yours.

It was sarcasm. The fact that you jumped on the first passing bandwagon with such relish was not, amazingly, a strong town tell.

*sigh*

I wish I was as good at this game as Dybeck is. Did you guys hear how awesome he is? On a scale of 1 to 10, he's so good!

[Cogito Ergo Scum]

Oh crap, I didn't see he already had two votes on him.

unvote

Third person on a wagon is likely to be mafia (+15)

[Peers]

How does one lurk in plain sight, anyway?

[jmar]

I've already defended myself against PlaysWithSquirrels' accusations. If you still wanna bandwagon me I've got no problem with it. But I'm gonna

unvote, vote: PlaysWithSquirrels

, because A, he seems like a jackass, and B, he's really pushing for a lynch when he has very little to go on. Plus he showed up around the 5th page and accused me of lurking. So, yeah.