In post 98, Lapsa wrote:In post 93, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have no plans of responding at this time.
be sure to let me know when you do
i'm prone to wagon you just because of your playstyle
VOTE: Lapsa
In post 98, Lapsa wrote:In post 93, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have no plans of responding at this time.
be sure to let me know when you do
i'm prone to wagon you just because of your playstyle
In post 96, Jake from State Farm wrote:
because his only post at the time was asking RC a question that was blatantly obvious if you read the posts that came before it so it looked like fake contribution
In post 74, Lapsa wrote:@RadiantCowbells why are you voting Acryon?
In post 99, Fire Assassin wrote:In post 97, BananaCucho wrote:I guess a better phrased question would be, anything I should focus on in the last four pages while I skim it?
How haven't you already skimmed it? Its mostly standard RVS, though Lapsa sticks out cause he is trying to get reasons for votes from people and asking a lot of questions. It seems like someone attempting to look like like they are town.
In post 101, RadiantCowbells wrote:
I'm not explaining why I voted someone when I clearly explained why I vote them though.
In post 53, RadiantCowbells wrote:We've never played together where I've been scum?
In post 51, Jake from State Farm wrote:hey RC - I just realized that we have played like 6 games together and you have only been scum twice. man those 2 games must have really done a number on me lol
In post 104, nnn_thekushmountains wrote:haha yeah... voted for whatshisname without actualyl reading anythign he wrote. But jarjardrinks points against him looked pretty good.
But whathisname defense looked pretty good as well. In fact it made jarjar look kind of bad for the misrepresentation.
So I'll UNVOTE: whathisname.
Real talk: there's been a lot more activity so far than I was prepared for. So I kinda just did some dumb shit to be invovled. I'm going need some time before I can read everything closely and have good opinions.
In post 109, Lapsa wrote:In post 101, RadiantCowbells wrote:
I'm not explaining why I voted someone when I clearly explained why I vote them though.
okay... let's try looking for it once again
In post 53, RadiantCowbells wrote:We've never played together where I've been scum?
this one's the only viable candidate to be "an explanation" for your vote
who are you talking about, who's "we"?
nope... seems like an answer to low-energy-excuse ancient dude:
In post 51, Jake from State Farm wrote:hey RC - I just realized that we have played like 6 games together and you have only been scum twice. man those 2 games must have really done a number on me lol
you are lying, RC. there is no explanation for your acryon vote on #53
In post 99, Fire Assassin wrote:In post 97, BananaCucho wrote:I guess a better phrased question would be, anything I should focus on in the last four pages while I skim it?
How haven't you already skimmed it? Its mostly standard RVS, though Lapsa sticks out cause he is trying to get reasons for votes from people and asking a lot of questions. It seems like someone attempting to look like like they are town.
In post 51, Jake from State Farm wrote:hey RC - I just realized that we have played like 6 games together and you have only been scum twice. man those 2 games must have really done a number on me lol
In post 52, acryon wrote:In post 51, Jake from State Farm wrote:hey RC - I just realized that we have played like 6 games together and you have only been scum twice. man those 2 games must have really done a number on me lol
Don't worry I feel the same. PTSD.
In post 111, Jake from State Farm wrote:my god you can't be this dumb
In post 116, JarJarDrinks wrote:lol. THAT is what you call blatantly obvious?
In post 99, Fire Assassin wrote:
Its mostly standard RVS, though Lapsa sticks out cause he is trying to get reasons for votes from people and asking a lot of questions.
It seems like someone attempting to look like like they are town.
i have no idea what you mean what is an "alt"In post 67, Jake from State Farm wrote:so an alt. gotcha
and my vote is now based on the other thing! reason change, vote staysIn post 68, acryon wrote:In post 65, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
notice the bit where i said "ill accept this" and then pointed out an entirely unrelated problem
congrats on your reading skills
Except you voted me based on your misunderstanding. But I'd rather not clog the thread with this. Taking a break for a bit to let other people post.
omgus?
ewIn post 90, Lapsa wrote:In post 89, BananaCucho wrote:Anything worth reading in the last four pages?
no, don't bother
so you "just skimmed" yet you managed to miss that we were pretty obviously out of rvsIn post 107, Garmr wrote:VOTE: Lapsa
Just skimmed will give a proper read latter but
Because this slot always reads me as scum when I am town and it always best to get rid of hindrances.
"look at me i didnt read the game but im trying to hide this fact"In post 109, Lapsa wrote:In post 101, RadiantCowbells wrote:
I'm not explaining why I voted someone when I clearly explained why I vote them though.
okay... let's try looking for it once again
In post 53, RadiantCowbells wrote:We've never played together where I've been scum?
this one's the only viable candidate to be "an explanation" for your vote
who are you talking about, who's "we"?
nope... seems like an answer to low-energy-excuse ancient dude:
In post 51, Jake from State Farm wrote:hey RC - I just realized that we have played like 6 games together and you have only been scum twice. man those 2 games must have really done a number on me lol
you are lying, RC. there is no explanation for your acryon vote on #53
are you being a rash again because youre making my skin itchIn post 117, RadiantCowbells wrote:No seriously.
I want this hammered by the time I get back this evening.