has it ever occurred to you that maybe youre just really bad?In post 299, Ircher wrote:Then dont post a case that is 100% null indicative.
In post 286, Not_Mafia wrote:Okay I'm ready now
VOTE: Fire Assassin
Disappointed that smudger got to lurk off his wagon but feeling increasingly better about FA lynch
In post 301, Gorkington wrote:has it ever occurred to you that maybe youre just really bad?In post 299, Ircher wrote:Then dont post a case that is 100% null indicative.
In post 292, Not_Mafia wrote:Ircher opposing this wagon makes me feel better
In post 294, Not_Mafia wrote:It just, makes me more confident it's a scum lynch
In post 305, Gorkington wrote:ircher is being an incoherent mess at me while acting like hes actually good at the game.
sorry.
not interested in playing nice.
In post 304, Fire Assassin wrote:In post 292, Not_Mafia wrote:Ircher opposing this wagon makes me feel better
In post 294, Not_Mafia wrote:It just, makes me more confident it's a scum lynch
Want to go more into why because Ircher is against it, it makes you more confortable?
Who are you scum reading?
me?
Ircher?
Smudger?
In post 307, Not_Mafia wrote:You and smudger, Ircher is my biggest townread
not mafia is still townish.In post 306, Fire Assassin wrote:Now what you think of Not Mafia and Minsc?
In post 308, Fire Assassin wrote:In post 307, Not_Mafia wrote:You and smudger, Ircher is my biggest townread
So you just thin Ircher is way off base then.....
I don't know how you connect Ircher being town to being more confident in this being a scum lynch.....
Those are weird connections.
In post 310, Not_Mafia wrote:*Makes connection*
*Says he doesn't know connection*
*Calls connecion weird*
Your posts have more twists than a soap opera
no more worried about iece than i am anyone else whos flying under radar.In post 317, Minsc and Boo wrote:Ircher, Gork is town and so are you, so stop it.
Gork, are you worried about Iecerint? Do you agree with my townread on Ircher?
In post 318, Gorkington wrote:in other news, i appreciate fire assassin's optimism in the face of hard tunneling/lots of people being toxic around him.
i still think hes scum.
but hes a cool dude.
:/
In post 319, Minsc and Boo wrote:how do you feel about Xkfyu? There's something about him that's rubbing me the wrong way.
-Radja
In post 249, Gorkington wrote:oooo did you want me to double down on my cheeky bullshit? because you ignoring me actually giving content in the form of a case to continue this hilarious tirade against me having fun in this game is just amazing and you really are just incentivizing me at this point.maruchan wrote:Gorkington still has failed to respond to any question or request posed to him regarding his reads or changes of his reads, and just continues attempting to make snide humor comments, that fail to provide humor.
In post 287, Ircher wrote:In post 251, Gorkington wrote:like seriously, im driving the biggest wagon in the game right now with the best-made case. tomorrow i'll pick at fire's response to it. and then i'll probably drive the game some more. does it bother you that youre impressively uninfluential when youre trying so hard while a buffoon who doesnt use proper grammar and posts sarcastically 90% of the time is?
That case was actually rather awful. I literally thought it would be decent and didnt bother to check the evidence.
In post 322, Maruchan wrote:In post 249, Gorkington wrote:oooo did you want me to double down on my cheeky bullshit? because you ignoring me actually giving content in the form of a case to continue this hilarious tirade against me having fun in this game is just amazing and you really are just incentivizing me at this point.maruchan wrote:Gorkington still has failed to respond to any question or request posed to him regarding his reads or changes of his reads, and just continues attempting to make snide humor comments, that fail to provide humor.
At the point in my read through I made that comment your case had not yet been made, and you still have avoided even acknowledging me or XK asking you about your reads on us. You've continued to blatantly ignore that.
In post 287, Ircher wrote:In post 251, Gorkington wrote:like seriously, im driving the biggest wagon in the game right now with the best-made case. tomorrow i'll pick at fire's response to it. and then i'll probably drive the game some more. does it bother you that youre impressively uninfluential when youre trying so hard while a buffoon who doesnt use proper grammar and posts sarcastically 90% of the time is?
That case was actually rather awful. I literally thought it would be decent and didnt bother to check the evidence.
Literally how is this town play.
"Oh I was too lazy to read the first case of the game ,but since it was the first case of the game, hey, I'll hop on it. BANDWAGGON AHOY".
THAT IS NOT TOWN PLAY.
maybe its that i feel like youre asking for the sake of asking at this point? like that you feel on principle that ive wronged you by not answering your question.In post 322, Maruchan wrote:you still have avoided even acknowledging me or XK asking you about your reads on us. You've continued to blatantly ignore that.