Mini 1776: Evolution Mafia (Game Over)

[zakk]

zakk are you scum that sounded really fake

No and idc

[Hellhound]

none of this explains why pers didnt claim the ascetic despite knowing it was negative utility

not lynching pers is pretty indefensible atp

[Hellhound]

I've only seen ascetic once before and they didn't claim.

1) were they town?

if not, i'm guessing they were a newb who never saw the role before and didn't know what to do.

you had several options:
> you could have straight up claimed the ascetic
> you could've dropped subtle crumbs
> you could've just vaguely said "don't target me" and just left it at that.
> fuck, you could've gambited and claimed pgo

there's things you could've done, but you made no effort to be proactive and get town pr's to not target you. you played your role to maximum scum utility AND the kicker is that you knew it was stepping on town's toes but didn't do anything about it.


now you're selling the "oh well look the mod made TOWN all these things" but i'm not buying. it's too late for that and these are all reactive responses to getting caught out by flubber's track.

[Apricity]

oh so i misinterpreted the results we got.

we DID get flubber's results. it was a "no result" on persivul.

i am now ok w/ lynching persivul.

VOTE: persivul

Why does a "no result" make you ok with lynching Persi? He's in my guess for the scumteam too, but I'm wondering why this specifically.

[Apricity]

Also, that Persi is perfectly fine with lynching Hiplop is giving me second thoughts about Hiplop :/

[Edgar Allan Pro]

My main question is why would Persivul claim out of the blue like that?
Especially with such a negative-utility looking role.
It's either town trying to put info on the table about their negative utility (in my experience, Ascetic always claims ASAP) or it's scum gambiting that claiming their negative utility will get them townread.
In either case, there really wasn't much pressure to lynch Persivul anyway, right? I thought it was going to be down to Lane or Hiplop, tbh.

I don't know how to make heads or tails of it. I guess we trust him on the claim, though.

-V

[hiplop]

lol eap is scum with persivul

[Edgar Allan Pro]

That's the only way you get to corral for both of us to get lynched so that you can swing off your hard push on me should a Persivul wagon spring up, right?

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Fencesit harder, Scumlop.
<3

[Hellhound]

thank you for proving you're not reading the thread varsoon

[Hellhound]

oh so i misinterpreted the results we got.

we DID get flubber's results. it was a "no result" on persivul.

i am now ok w/ lynching persivul.

VOTE: persivul

JUST on the last page

this is why pers claimed.

it's wasn't out of the blue

[Edgar Allan Pro]

I'd love for you to illuminate how I'm not reading, bro.
Seeing as there's about two posts every day, it's a pretty farfetched claim to make.

A "No Result" on persivul does not equal a need to claim, homie.
Especially given Persivul's claim, if true.

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Like, there was literal no pressure to claim.
Hellhound votes are proven worthless votes with no pressure in this game.
Otherwise I would've been lynched D1, right?

[Edgar Allan Pro]

That's what I'm saying, that's what I'm commenting on.
Maybe you need to re-read the thread.

[Hellhound]

A "No Result" on persivul does not equal a need to claim, homie.

in this case, yeah it kinda does.

for there to be no result:
flubber got roleblocked and killed in the same night (not likely)
pers had to have gotten rolestopped (pretty scummy)
pers is an ascetic

why wouldn't pers, as scum, go ahead and fess up to the ascetic?

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Derp, you got me, I am illiterate.
I misread the claim as Ascetizer twice, rather than Ascetic and then evolved to Ascetizer.
I thought it was like SirCakez, where he got an single shot and could evolve into a second shot.
In this case, yeah, you're right.

Would "No Result" still be yielded if Persivul didn't visit anyone anyway or would it say "Persivul didn't visit anyone"?
Because if "No Result" is is indicative of not visiting anyone, then it's no pressure, but if "No Result" absolutely means a blocked action/rolestopped/ascetic, then I do see what you mean.

[hiplop]

Fencesit harder, Scumlop.
<3

fence....sit?

[zakk]

lol eap is scum with persivul

obv

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Fencesit harder, Scumlop.
<3

fence....sit?

"I'll just call both other high-profile players up to lynch today scum so that if the votes swing to anyone but me, I can vote there and look like I'm not just lolhammering like I did yesterday."

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Who as AM'd yesterday, by the way?

[hiplop]

youre both scumtogether

whichever dies today the other dies tomo

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Nope, try again.
You're scum and I'm lynching you.
You still haven't excused or explained your horrible play yesterday.

[Edgar Allan Pro]

Who as AM'd yesterday, by the way?

Why'd you dodge this question, Hiplop?
If I am reading the game right, you were AntiMutagen'd yesterday, meaning you couldn't evolve.
Why did you troll hammer when there were two other players who you could have let vote and gain more powers?
Even if you think I'm scum, why did you do that when you don't seem to be scumreading Specter Deflectors?

VOTE: Hiplop

Die.

[hiplop]

ok

[hiplop]

you called me a fence sitter despite having VERY EXTREME OPINIONS

that is absurd. You're throwing around buzzwords trying tof ind something that clicks. You know I'm town and it pains you to vote me