In post 83, DO NOT TALK TO US wrote:You've somehow managed to confidently ignore one of these two pieces of information, even though it would resolve the cognitive dissonance in a way that you otherwise can't without assuming we're scum. And, to use your own logic, you're not voting us, ergo you don't think we're scummy.
I think if pisskop had a bit more tact, then the way he would have approached this situation is by asking you why you had your vote on an RVS vote instead of moving it to him when you had what seemed like a serious scumread there. I don't think possessing or lacking tact is an alignment tell more than it is a personality tell, but I do think that the way you've approached this situation is more likely town than not.
In post 89, Performer wrote:I'm shocked and horrified. Now we are less 1 Townie, an Innocent Townie at that. I have no idea who she is, this is the 1st time I 've seen her ever. So I don't know who would've targeted her.
I'm hypothesizing there's at least 1 person here who should know who she is though....and I don't mean the mod. I don't think she was just randomly targeted.
I'm assuming this is a persona, based on how laughably fake this is; was surprised to see pisskop (who has played with you before, apparently) to take it as something you genuinely believe.
In post 136, Antihero wrote:him not giving me room until i can get a good grip on the game and slapping a scum label on me for super terrible reasons is anti town at best and kinda' scummy at worst.
even if he's using his "ive never seen anti come up empty as town before" he's also seen me as scum before and, by his apparently rigid paradigm of meta, it's not "like me" to do what i'm doing now as scum either so... what gives?
This doesn't make sense as an attack when applied to Fire, unless you think that it's more likely that he'd attack you as scum and expect to get townread as opposed to pressure you early as town in order to attempt to get a stronger read.
In post 138, Davsto wrote:Please! Oh please let me join the RVS wagon on me!
VOTE: Davsto
I didn't really like this; it seemed like extending the RVS in a bit of an awkward way. Would have liked it a lot more if he entered and scumhunted/acknowledged that he didn't really see anything relevant instead of this.
In post 146, Antihero wrote:
came up empty in a search
how would you know if fire meant it in "passing" and how is what i said an overreaction?
I don't really understand what you're getting at here.
It seems obvious to me that Fire's initial push towards you was pretty much nothing more than a baseless push; your reaction was an overreaction because Fire making an empty push at you to get a read on you shouldn't have elicited a significant response from you (it wasn't clear you were nullreading Fire until you said so explicitly).
In post 155, Antihero wrote:im not getting lynched today or ever so fire should probably go ahead and get ready to pretend to "change his mind" on me sometume soon.
just a heads up
I did like this post, though; I don't really see you digging your heels in this deep as early as you would be here.
The difference between sarcasm and "over the top sarcasm" isn't meaningful.
In post 177, Davsto wrote:In all seriousness though, I'm unsure how I feel about Marquis' unvote.
Feels kinda like he's worried those on this wagon will have bad connotations in the future and wants to be seen to have unvoted me
hmm
I don't know what you're driving at here unless you think that something you've done this game so far looks particularly town; Marquis has no reason to unvote you until you actually look town unless you think he'll look bad staying on your wagon until you obvtown?
In post 185, pisskop wrote:Noes. I was actually nullscum reading marque for the earlier dave poke
What was wrong with the earlier dave poke?
I don't think this is such a great scumread.
Why? The first 5 pages were objectively pretty light on content.
In post 212, You Got Schooled wrote:Fir, I'm assuming you have played with Anti before? Can you tell me what you was expecting from your reaction test? Can you tell me why Anti being defensive is scummy?
Fire didn't say that Anti being defensive was scummy, just interesting. I don't understand the point of asking this question when later in that same post Fire made a couple comments towards Antihero that pretty strongly implied that he was townreading him.
Why did you dislike Antihero saying this at 5 pages when you disagreed with him? Why would you vote Fate here?
In post 222, You Got Schooled wrote:I mean, do I expect a lot from you as town? Yeah, I do. So when you don't deliver it immediately sets off bells in my head.
This doesn't make sense; you can't just magically post a deliver a bunch when not a lot has happened.
I don't really like this attack because it seems like the sort of thing you would do in order to fake having a genuine read on Antihero unless you have a really terrible way of reading him.
In post 234, You Got Schooled wrote:When I say you, I'm talking about your slot. Your both responsible for what your slot posts, so don't give me the 'No he said, she said' shit coz am not buying it.
They are two separate players. The only way Xkfyu would be responsible for everything that Fire said is if Fire ran everything through Xkfyu before posting, which is clearly not the case. I also really don't understand how you're even pushing the "he said, she said" shit when they've both signed their posts separately; it's not like there's any chance of them covering up a weird stance by blaming it on the other head, which is the only legitimate worry you could have with this kind of post.
) has actually asked some fairly decent questions and prodded at a few different people: he got a good question or two in early on peformer, for example. His vote on you is bad, though, and the fact it's a rehash of his rvs is odd, but not scummy. 
