Mini 1776: Evolution Mafia (Game Over)

Specter Deflectors · Post Post #900 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:49 am

AM: lane

Specter Deflectors · Post Post #901 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:49 am

^^^^ Max

lane0168 · Post Post #902 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:49 am

In post 895, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 889, lane0168 wrote:Haha says the guy coming back from a prod

So did you have anything to say about my response to you, or were you just asking questions for the sake of it?
- Max

No, I'm assuming you'll finishing your reads when you're all the way caught up, no?

lane0168 · Post Post #903 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:50 am

No zakk, Persivul knows I'm town, he's said it a few times. Quit being horrible

zakk · Post Post #904 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 5:53 am

> gets voted by zakk
> calls zakk horrible
> expects that to change anything

Spoiler: mfw

zakk · Post Post #905 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:20 am

*serious face*

In post 52, Apricity wrote:
In post 47, Persivul wrote:
In post 42, Apricity wrote:Or we can just do it whenever and come closer to a consensus near lynchtime.

April let's lynch heat and get delicious mutations.

That's not very nice =O But I don't have a better place to be with Specter absent.

VOTE: Heat

I still haven't gotten an explanation for the Varsoon/I am not Varsoon and apparently there's also an I am not I am not Varsoon?

The last would be me, lol.

This post in particular feels really earlygame newbscum

calling Apricity-scum right now

zakk · Post Post #906 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:45 am

persivul, also, i made you a new avatar to go with your custom title

pls use it and we can be best friends forever

Specter Deflectors · Post Post #907 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:52 am

In post 864, hiplop wrote:I'm pretty sure max/ep are the same person TBH

the same awesome person

In post 875, Hellhound wrote:
In post 868, Hellhound wrote:I personally think you are town, but Anti isn't convinced.

im not

i think there's something to iec dying n1 and i think the specters read is likely it

why are you beating around the bush here

will talk to max about everyone in the playerlist but i'll still be here.

-EP

zakk · Post Post #908 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:55 am

max what do you think about my apricity suspicion

Hellhound · Post Post #909 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:59 am

In post 907, Specter Deflectors wrote:why are you beating around the bush here

i'm...not?

Hellhound · Post Post #910 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:01 am

In post 893, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 884, Hellhound wrote:well that's exactly what i'm thinking

what EXACTLY is "mislynchable"?

Where is this line of questioning going? You know the definition as well as I do.
- Max

no, i don't b/c i've never played w/ zakk before

so, it's going to "is zakk really lynchbait?" AND "are spectors just whiteknighting or pulling the vi card for a buddy?"

but you know me. i just love asking pointless questions and wasting everyone's time so i guess let's go w/ that.

In post 896, zakk wrote:
In post 882, Hellhound wrote:
In post 881, Specter Deflectors wrote:I just remember having you as a good mislynch opportunity.

ok lets go into this more

why was he a "good mislynch opportunity" then and how is it now applicable TO THIS SPECIFIC GAME?

no generalities.

mostly it's cause I either lurk or get really really active, and my opinions are all over the place

both sides of the annoying spectrum, plus pretty hard to read, so most people just chalk it up to "easy early game lynch fodder"

problem is, I'm always town when that happens, so

^^^^
well you answered the question better than specters did so i guess i can't fault you for that

Specter Deflectors · Post Post #911 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:01 am

In post 908, zakk wrote:max what do you think about my apricity suspicion

I don't think the post you quoted is indicative of anything at all, alignment-wise. Yesterday I might've said something about it (waiting for me to respond to an RVS vote is a bit weird) to start discussion but for now I can't really care. Do you have any other material?

And lane, I feel like you're more just showing up to respond to your name being used than actively hunting. Why just wait around for me to catch up and not ask for me to do so? I've been here, chatting, why didn't you press me?
- Max

Specter Deflectors · Post Post #912 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:03 am

In post 909, Hellhound wrote:
In post 907, Specter Deflectors wrote:why are you beating around the bush here

i'm...not?

you're implying that scum killed iece because iece was pretty much the only person scumreading us D1 and that's why we're scum, is this correct interpretation of what you said

-EP

PEDIT OH DAMN BOTH HEADS ARE HERE MAX TALK TO ME!

Specter Deflectors · Post Post #913 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:07 am

In post 910, Hellhound wrote:
In post 893, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 884, Hellhound wrote:well that's exactly what i'm thinking

what EXACTLY is "mislynchable"?

Where is this line of questioning going? You know the definition as well as I do.
- Max

no, i don't b/c i've never played w/ zakk before

so, it's going to "is zakk really lynchbait?" AND "are spectors just whiteknighting or pulling the vi card for a buddy?"

but you know me. i just love asking pointless questions and wasting everyone's time so i guess let's go w/ that.

You asked me what mislynchable meant, I assumed we were talking about the term.
Why did you have to ask yourself if I'm whiteknighting? You're the one who asked questions about my thoughts on zakk. There's no pressure on the guy, I was content to leave things as they were after I remembered where I'd played with zakk before.

For the record, I don't have a problem with his recent posts, or his lane vote.

And your last line is just you being difficult. Why do you keep taking every little thing I say to you as some sort of personal attack?
- Max

PEdit: IM IN THE PT BRO, LETS BOOGIE

Hellhound · Post Post #914 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:09 am

In post 892, Edgar Allan Pro wrote:Gonna need some elaboration on those reads, Hellhound.

the only response this is going to get from me as of now is "read the fucking thread"

i'm tired of being snippy with you

but so far in this game you've shown zero interest in having any sort of constructive conversation and you're just kind of throwing stuff out there without really knowing what's going on in the thread. ok fine you have rl stuff going on. but i'm going to tell you the same thing that you JUST told everyone else. if you actually want elaboration, you need to ask specific stuff b/c just barking an order at me to "elaborate" is just going to piss me off. it shows you're not really interested in the my reads and you're more interested in ... doing something else. (i'm assuming looking town. at least that's my hope at this point because the alternative is pretty unsavory.)

Hellhound · Post Post #915 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:15 am

In post 913, Specter Deflectors wrote:And your last line is just you being difficult. Why do you keep taking every little thing I say to you as some sort of personal attack?

i am a very difficult person

Flubbernugget · Post Post #916 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:17 am

In post 894, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 887, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 879, Specter Deflectors wrote:I know nothing about your relationship with Hiplop tbh. Do you guys have a thing?
- Max

You didn't see him lose his shit for half a page?

Oh, you were talking about this game. And I kinda forgot about that. (i DID skim last day)
nvm
So I gotta ask.. you avoided commenting/asking hip about that vote because he lost his shit at the end of day 1? y/n?
- Max

I haven't interacted with him since.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #917 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:18 am

In post 898, zakk wrote:
In post 888, Flubbernugget wrote:Line's lack of activity is starting to bug me

In post 889, lane0168 wrote:Haha says the guy coming back from a prod

Vote: lane

what?

zakk · Post Post #918 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:29 am

In post 911, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 908, zakk wrote:max what do you think about my apricity suspicion

I don't think the post you quoted is indicative of anything at all, alignment-wise.

that's because you're a DAMN ROOKIE

zakk · Post Post #919 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:31 am

In post 910, Hellhound wrote:
In post 893, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 884, Hellhound wrote:well that's exactly what i'm thinking

what EXACTLY is "mislynchable"?

Where is this line of questioning going? You know the definition as well as I do.
- Max

no, i don't b/c i've never played w/ zakk before

so, it's going to "is zakk really lynchbait?" AND "are spectors just whiteknighting or pulling the vi card for a buddy?"

but you know me. i just love asking pointless questions and wasting everyone's time so i guess let's go w/ that.

In post 896, zakk wrote:
In post 882, Hellhound wrote:
In post 881, Specter Deflectors wrote:I just remember having you as a good mislynch opportunity.

ok lets go into this more

why was he a "good mislynch opportunity" then and how is it now applicable TO THIS SPECIFIC GAME?

no generalities.

mostly it's cause I either lurk or get really really active, and my opinions are all over the place

both sides of the annoying spectrum, plus pretty hard to read, so most people just chalk it up to "easy early game lynch fodder"

problem is, I'm always town when that happens, so

^^^^
well you answered the question better than specters did so i guess i can't fault you for that

i answer questions and think well, obv

why you would try to fault me for anything is beyond me

anybody who calls me a vi has never seen me play my best and/or is just trying to get popularity points by picking on the less popular kid

i'm a whirlwind tour de force when i'm at the top of my game (which isn't often but shhhh)

zakk · Post Post #920 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:45 am

In post 917, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 898, zakk wrote:
In post 888, Flubbernugget wrote:Line's lack of activity is starting to bug me

In post 889, lane0168 wrote:Haha says the guy coming back from a prod

Vote: lane

what?

what?

, what?

Heat · Post Post #921 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:48 am

prodge

going to an interview later today, will catch up after

lane0168 · Post Post #922 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:52 am

In post 904, zakk wrote:> gets voted by zakk
> calls zakk horrible
> expects that to change anything

Spoiler: mfw

Being horrible is hoping someone is voting me after they've stated more than once that they're town reading me, it had nothing to do with your vote smart one.

lane0168 · Post Post #923 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:52 am

Be nice if you read the game though

lane0168 · Post Post #924 (ISO) » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:59 am

In post 911, Specter Deflectors wrote:
In post 908, zakk wrote:max what do you think about my apricity suspicion

I don't think the post you quoted is indicative of anything at all, alignment-wise. Yesterday I might've said something about it (waiting for me to respond to an RVS vote is a bit weird) to start discussion but for now I can't really care. Do you have any other material?

And lane, I feel like you're more just showing up to respond to your name being used than actively hunting. Why just wait around for me to catch up and not ask for me to do so? I've been here, chatting, why didn't you press me?
- Max

Press you about what? You were obviously well on your way to a full reads list. But I guess I was wrong about you wanting to finish it. I pointed out it was incomplete, you said you weren't finished catching up... And I assumed that meant you were going to continue? What's hard to understand? You're questioning me for thinking you were going to go do something, instead of going and just doing it, you're just asking me why I'm not continuously asking you why you aren't doing it? Just go fucking do it