In post 873, Garmr wrote:In post 866, Expedience wrote:I mean, you can't really go back on the "lel lets hard townread and chainsaw defend each other" it now.
So you admit to chainsawing for chilled.
No, I obviously didn't mean that when I said
In post 873, Garmr wrote:In post 866, Expedience wrote:I mean, you can't really go back on the "lel lets hard townread and chainsaw defend each other" it now.
So you admit to chainsawing for chilled.
In post 876, Sakura Hana wrote:That's still backtracking, your backtracking on saying your arguments at the start of the day were legit. I don't even understand why town would do what you're doing, and all those misprepresentations and taunting are seriously pissing me off.
In post 875, Expedience wrote:In post 873, Garmr wrote:In post 866, Expedience wrote:I mean, you can't really go back on the "lel lets hard townread and chainsaw defend each other" it now.
So you admit to chainsawing for chilled.
No, I obviously didn't mean that when I saidyou, you scumfuck. You and Sakura.
In post 879, Expedience wrote:Define buzzwords however you like. My posts weren't from a scum perspective.
In post 880, Garmr wrote:In post 875, Expedience wrote:In post 873, Garmr wrote:In post 866, Expedience wrote:I mean, you can't really go back on the "lel lets hard townread and chainsaw defend each other" it now.
So you admit to chainsawing for chilled.
No, I obviously didn't mean that when I saidyou, you scumfuck. You and Sakura.
So you did do it but weren't referring to that?
In post 882, Sakura Hana wrote:Or is it that after witnessing how I reacted on Blitz 21 you decided to just do the exact same thing again every game?
Do you hate me that much?
Is it your objetive to make me ragequit MS again?
In post 882, Sakura Hana wrote:Or is it that after witnessing how I reacted on Blitz 21 you decided to just do the exact same thing again every game?
Do you hate me that much?
Is it your objetive to make me ragequit MS again?
In post 874, Expedience wrote:In post 872, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 870, Expedience wrote:I'm not seriously saying that you're scum for putting Madonna to L-1, and I never was. I was just trying to pressure you into actually doing something rather than all the posturing and not voting anyone.
So backtracking now?
Oh fuck off.
In post 687, Expedience wrote:I'm just having a bit of fun at the scum's expense, relax.
In post 875, Expedience wrote:In post 873, Garmr wrote:In post 866, Expedience wrote:I mean, you can't really go back on the "lel lets hard townread and chainsaw defend each other" it now.
So you admit to chainsawing for chilled.
No, I obviously didn't mean that when I saidyou, you scumfuck. You and Sakura.
In post 885, mhsmith0 wrote:In post 882, Sakura Hana wrote:Or is it that after witnessing how I reacted on Blitz 21 you decided to just do the exact same thing again every game?
Do you hate me that much?
Is it your objetive to make me ragequit MS again?
Is this the game you reference?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=110&t=65049
I suppose I should look at it for a comparison point.
In post 883, Expedience wrote:In post 880, Garmr wrote:In post 875, Expedience wrote:In post 873, Garmr wrote:In [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7788473#p7788473]post 866[/UCL], Expedience wrote:I mean, you can't really go back on the "lel lets hard townread and chainsaw defend each other" it now.
So you admit to chainsawing for chilled.
No, I obviously didn't mean that when I saidyou, you scumfuck. You and Sakura.
So you did do it but weren't referring to that?
It depends how you define that buzzphrase. I think you are scum and chilledtea is town. I thought that you were scum before you accused chilledtea. I thought that your accusation on chilledtea was awful and scummy.
In post 887, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 885, mhsmith0 wrote:In post 882, Sakura Hana wrote:Or is it that after witnessing how I reacted on Blitz 21 you decided to just do the exact same thing again every game?
Do you hate me that much?
Is it your objetive to make me ragequit MS again?
Is this the game you reference?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=110&t=65049
I suppose I should look at it for a comparison point.
Yes that's the game I reference.
People led by Wisdom just kept shouting that I was scum, with no reasoning, and everyone just followed along and didnt let me do anything so I end up ragequitting.
My current belief is that Expedience is trying to achieve the same since he knows how i react as town, and it's why he's trying to make those misrepresentations, snarky remarks and taunting me.
In post 855, Sakura Hana wrote:Tbh i've always hated TvS arguments, because it looks like scum lining up lynches.
Boon is scum for lying and doing the above.
Expedience is scum for misrepresenting every single one of my posts since day 1.
In post 857, Sakura Hana wrote:
2)Boon is lying like here:
In post 821, Boonskiies wrote:Also, I haven't been paying too much to expedience. I feel like he's repeating himself.
If he's not paying too much attention to expedience how does he know this:
In post 825, Boonskiies wrote:I wouldn't say we have exact same reads. I feel he scum reads you harder than I do, and my scum read on you is more external. And minus chilled is quite a big thing. We may have lean scum reads on similar people,but I assure you, our reads are not the same.
In post 889, mhsmith0 wrote:Is it your opinion that you would only be affected this way as town?
In post 891, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 889, mhsmith0 wrote:Is it your opinion that you would only be affected this way as town?
I don't have any opinion on anything meta related to me, I let ppl meta me and form their own opinions. Because anything that i know would attribute to just town me, i will implement to my scum game.
That being said.
I guess I can be affected as both alignments, but the difference is that as scum it would be fake.
In post 863, Garmr wrote:Your interracial
In post 894, ToastyToast wrote:@Sakura: those posts of expedience's that you listed don't read as misreps to me. I think it is a weak interpretation but those are different things. Could you explain further why you feel those were misreps?
In post 895, Sakura Hana wrote:it's the former
In post 896, Sakura Hana wrote:Toasty: Why do we have opposite reads regarding Almost and Expedience, i don't understand why anyone's townreading what he's doing, i don't get why ppl don't see what i'm seeing, and the only person that's actually been seeing what im seeing is Almost50 as shown in 673 which is another reason for me to think he's town.
In post 896, Sakura Hana wrote:Toasty: Why do we have opposite reads regarding Almost and Expedience, i don't understand why anyone's townreading what he's doing, i don't get why ppl don't see what i'm seeing, and the only person that's actually been seeing what im seeing is Almost50 as shown in 673 which is another reason for me to think he's town.