Mini Normal 1775 END!

Sakura Hana · Post Post #800 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 4:21 am

Hi, I haven't read anything that happened since i left yet and not planning on doing so anytime soon, if anyone would be so nice as to provide a summary that would be cool.

texcat · Post Post #801 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:52 am

In post 784, chilledtea wrote:
In post 781, Almost50 wrote:@smith:
May you vote Lowell, please? His flip should help you solidify or reverse your read on texcat. They can't be scum together, can they?

@chilled:
Likewise.

Lowell did a semi-soft claim. Even if I vote him I want it to be so that there is no hammer.

He is also V/LA at the moment. Lets wait a bit for him.

I thought he denied the claim later?

In post 796, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 793, Expedience wrote:Sakura, Sakaya, texcat.

This is where I am, except I add chilled there. One of Tex/chilled is scum. Sakura/Sayaka I see potential scum, but I really don't have a case I feel I should push off of over Tex/chilled.

Where did this scum read of Sayaka come from? I don't think you've even mentioned her before.

chilledtea · Post Post #802 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:56 am

In post 801, texcat wrote:
In post 784, chilledtea wrote:
In post 781, Almost50 wrote:@smith:
May you vote Lowell, please? His flip should help you solidify or reverse your read on texcat. They can't be scum together, can they?

@chilled:
Likewise.

Lowell did a semi-soft claim. Even if I vote him I want it to be so that there is no hammer.

He is also V/LA at the moment. Lets wait a bit for him.

I thought he denied the claim later?

In post 796, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 793, Expedience wrote:Sakura, Sakaya, texcat.

This is where I am, except I add chilled there. One of Tex/chilled is scum. Sakura/Sayaka I see potential scum, but I really don't have a case I feel I should push off of over Tex/chilled.

Where did this scum read of Sayaka come from? I don't think you've even mentioned her before.

I think it would be wrong for him to outright claim if he was a PR. He might have been acting?

Almost50 · Post Post #803 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:06 am

In post 800, Sakura Hana wrote:Hi, I haven't read anything that happened since i left yet and not planning on doing so anytime soon, if anyone would be so nice as to provide a summary that would be cool.

Actually I wanted YOu to tell ME who your top 3 scum reads are. It doesn't help that you're not caught up, but "not planning on doing so anytime soon" is scummy as can be.

FA_Q2 · Post Post #804 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:16 am

VoteCount 2.5With 12 players alive, it takes

7

votes to lynch.

Sayaka Maizono (0):

Almost50 (0):

Sakura Hana (0):

Lowell (2):

texcat, Almost50

mhsmith0 (0):

texcat (4):

Sayaka Maizono, Lowell, chilledtea, Boonskiies (L-3)

Garmr (1):

Expedience

Boonskiies (1):

ToastyToast

Goodlordwill (0):

ToastyToast (0):

chilledtea (1):

Garmr

Expedience (0):

Not Voting (3):

mhsmith0, Goodlordwill, Sakura Hana

The deadline is in

(expired on 2016-04-05 12:00:00)

NOTES:
Still seeking replacement for GoodLordWill (if you know someone let em know

)

Sakura Hana · Post Post #805 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:47 am

In post 803, Almost50 wrote:
In post 800, Sakura Hana wrote:Hi, I haven't read anything that happened since i left yet and not planning on doing so anytime soon, if anyone would be so nice as to provide a summary that would be cool.

Actually I wanted YOu to tell ME who your top 3 scum reads are. It doesn't help that you're not caught up, but "not planning on doing so anytime soon" is scummy as can be.

If you think it's scummy then vote me for it, im not going to magically make up time to catch up, if you really need that info soon, a summary would be of great help.

Almost50 · Post Post #806 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:50 am

Here are the lists provided by others. Everyone has their own suspects:

Boons, Lowell & Expedience (Almost)
texcat, Lowell & chilledtea (smith)
Garmr, texcat & Lowell (chilledtea)
chilledtea, Lowell & Boons (texcat)
chilledtea, Boons & Expedience (Garmr)
Sakura, Sakaya, texcat (Expedience)
texcat, chilled, Sakura, Sakaya (Boons)

Sakura Hana · Post Post #807 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:52 am

In post 804, FA_Q2 wrote:Garmr (1): Expedience

In post 806, Almost50 wrote:Here are the lists provided by others. Everyone has their own suspects:

<snip>
Sakura, Sakaya, texcat (Expedience)
<snip>

Uh what.
Garmr is nowhere in this list yet Exp is voting him?

Sakura Hana · Post Post #808 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:55 am

Anyway as for my list it'd be Exp/Lowell

Sakura Hana · Post Post #809 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:56 am

if you need a 3rd it'd be texcat who is somewhere in the null-scum category.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #810 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:00 am

Also if Expedience is scumreading texcat why isnt he helping lynch her? Considering he's been doing everything about getting me to vote.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #811 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:05 am

Hmm no, from what i know of scum!Expedience he wouldn't hesistate to bus texcat if they were partners, texcat might be a mislynch
VOTE: Expedience

chilledtea · Post Post #812 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:20 am

In post 811, Sakura Hana wrote:Hmm no, from what i know of scum!Expedience he wouldn't hesistate to bus texcat if they were partners, texcat might be a mislynch
VOTE: Expedience

Have you read the thread thoroughly?

texcat · Post Post #813 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:26 am

LOL. Have you read this page thoroughly?

chilledtea · Post Post #814 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:28 am

In post 813, texcat wrote:LOL. Have you read this page thoroughly?

Yes, she was saying she wanted a summary and everything and from there went on to vote expedience. So I wondered if she had completed her reading.

Boonskiies · Post Post #815 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:39 am

Does it matter if I hadn't said it or not? It's not a fully developed read, like come on. I obviously am not huge on it. When the fuck have you heard me talk about trying to get Sakura lynched. And my read is Tex OR chilled.

Boonskiies · Post Post #816 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:39 am

I'm not moving my vote from texcat. That was blatant trying to send something this way.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #817 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:44 am

In post 814, chilledtea wrote:
In post 813, texcat wrote:LOL. Have you read this page thoroughly?

Yes, she was saying she wanted a summary and everything and from there went on to vote expedience. So I wondered if she had completed her reading.

If no one provides a summary i cant promise ill catch up at least until tomorrow, im basing my vote on Expedience's posts on D1 and what i saw from him on D2 before leaving.

In post 816, Boonskiies wrote:I'm not moving my vote from texcat. That was blatant trying to send something this way.

Why are you scumreading chilled?
What do you think of Expedience misrepresenting everything?

Boonskiies · Post Post #818 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:47 am

In post 783, Garmr wrote:
In post 780, Almost50 wrote:More nominees please? At least Garmr & Expedience should be able to provide their respective top 3 scum reads.

Boon
-I originally thought because he was more active than he usually is was a sign he was trying to improve his town game since he hardly gets voted as scum but these last couple of pages make me feel diffrent. I don't like how he was trying to threaten me by linking me to tex cat while buddying me at the same time.

In post 742, Boonskiies wrote:Garmr, if you and texcat are scum together, bus your buddy now please. Texcat is scum, we can lynch you tomorrow instead of today, okay? See, if you think about it, I'm actually protecting you.

Chilled, if texcat flips town, I'm coming hard after you tomorrow.

In post 744, Boonskiies wrote:Yeah, but Garmr is always like this too.

I really don't like being buddied.

This is crap. Alignment is not based on activity. I wasn't linking you and Tex together. In fact, I said the opposite and agreed with Lowell about not seeing the link. I tried to be playful in the"bus your buddy" sense to try and motivate you to vote texcat, the lynch that I want. It was more of a "just ignore what they are saying, because I don't really care what they are saying". Also, I have played numerous games with you. I HAVE MISLYNCHED YOU many times when I was the one hard pushing you. I have lynched you when you are scum. I know your general play style, and I know your recent posting isn't alignment indicative. I seriously don't understand what you are getting at now.

FoS: Garmr

I'd still rather deal with texcat/chilled situation.

mhsmith0 · Post Post #819 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:48 am

In post 815, Boonskiies wrote:Does it matter if I hadn't said it or not? It's not a fully developed read, like come on. I obviously am not huge on it. When the fuck have you heard me talk about trying to get Sakura lynched. And my read is Tex OR chilled.

Can you clarify why you think it's Tex OR ct? Why not both? Is there something specific suggesting town/scum here?

mhsmith0 · Post Post #820 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:50 am

In post 817, Sakura Hana wrote:
...
What do you think of Expedience misrepresenting everything?

Which things do you think that Expedience has misrepresented?

Boonskiies · Post Post #821 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:50 am

@Sakura - chilled vs texcat isn't TvT and it isn't SvS. They both are giving crap reasonings and switch wagons when something gets going. I am scum reading chilled for the same reasons texcat is being scum read.

Also, I haven't been paying too much to expedience. I feel like he's repeating himself.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #822 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:52 am

In post 821, Boonskiies wrote:They both are giving crap reasonings and switch wagons when something gets going. I am scum reading chilled for the same reasons texcat is being scum read.

So, why can't this be SvS from your PoV?

In post 821, Boonskiies wrote:Also, I haven't been paying too much to expedience. I feel like he's repeating himself.

Really? that's surprising, considering you both have the exact same reads (minus chilled)

Boonskiies · Post Post #823 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:52 am

In post 819, mhsmith0 wrote:
In post 815, Boonskiies wrote:Does it matter if I hadn't said it or not? It's not a fully developed read, like come on. I obviously am not huge on it. When the fuck have you heard me talk about trying to get Sakura lynched. And my read is Tex OR chilled.

Can you clarify why you think it's Tex OR ct? Why not both? Is there something specific suggesting town/scum here?

Their behavior doesnt benefit scum/scum at all. They are very likely to get one of themselves lynched if they are scum/scum, and that's just not good scum play at all. Unfortunately, I think they are the twos funniest players in this game, so of course I'm not going to see it as TvT. I tend to do better when I don't second guess myself.

chilledtea · Post Post #824 (ISO) » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:53 am

In post 821, Boonskiies wrote:@Sakura - chilled vs texcat isn't TvT and it isn't SvS. They both are giving crap reasonings and switch wagons when something gets going. I am scum reading chilled for the same reasons texcat is being scum read.

Also, I haven't been paying too much to expedience. I feel like he's repeating himself.

How can both texcat and I give crap reasonings to vote? My reasoning was texcat giving bad reasons to be suspicious of me. So by that logic you are giving bad reasoning as well.