Mini 1771 - Legend of Zelda Mafia: Storm the Castle Endgame

Phoenix Wright · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:26 am

Yeah. Did you? I said that you didn't explain why the posts were bad. I also said

you didn't say why you think I'm scum

. You ignored that last part and just asked about the first part. Why is that? After rereading it, you did say why you thought one of the posts was bad. But you only did it after Cleavage asked you why. If she hadn't asked you would've just said it was bad and left it at that. It feels like you wanted to jump on the easy wagon and didn't think an explanation was necessary.

ISO · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:31 am

Oh if you want a full case all put together of why I think you're scum I can do that when I get home.

Phoenix Wright · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:32 am

In post 351, SirCakez wrote:Oh if you want a full case all put together of why I think you're scum I can do that when I get home.

Alright

Xkfyu · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:33 am

In post 349, Nahdia wrote:greatest ongoing mystery of this game is beeboy's V key.

Yeah, his V key clearly works, and I have a serious distaste for questions to go unanswered. Hence why I prefer the beeboy lynch over the Cakez lynch, right now.

And if beeboy is trying to soft claim Vigilante, then all the more reason to lynch him.

Nahdia · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:36 am

still going with my "he just read homestuck" theory.

Question for those with far more experience than I; how many scum would one expect in a 13 person setup? 3?

Xkfyu · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:40 am

In post 354, Nahdia wrote:still going with my "he just read homestuck" theory.

Question for those with far more experience than I; how many scum would one expect in a 13 person setup? 3?

Sorry, I'm not familiar with that. However, even assuming that is the case, why wouldn't he just say so? Honestly, even if that isn't REALLY the case, you have now given him an out. So, he could still answer with that. If there is an innocent reason for it, or some reason that doesn't pertain to this game, then I see no reason why he wouldn't just answer.

Shiro · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:49 am

In post 353, Xkfyu wrote:And if beeboy is trying to soft claim Vigilante, then all the more reason to lynch him.

Ok uhm wtf? Did you just say all the more ro lynch someone who you think might be sifting pro town role?

Xkfyu · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:51 am

In post 354, Nahdia wrote:Question for those with far more experience than I; how many scum would one expect in a 13 person setup? 3?

I'm really not crazy about early game setup speculation because there just isn't enough information.

I mean, if this is a regular one town faction and one Mafia faction, then yeah 3 sounds right. But, there is nothing to suggest anything yet.

Xkfyu · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 3:56 am

In post 356, Shiro wrote:
In post 353, Xkfyu wrote:And if beeboy is trying to soft claim Vigilante, then all the more reason to lynch him.

Ok uhm wtf? Did you just say all the more ro lynch someone who you think might be sifting pro town role?

Yes, because what reason would a Town Vig have to crumb/soft-claim like this in D1? Sure, maybe he crumbs his target at the end of the day, just in case he is NKed, but not like this.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 4:58 am

What reason would have scum to crump vig in a very bleh way? Why assume illogical scum over dumb town?

In post 354, Nahdia wrote:still going with my "he just read homestuck" theory.

If that is the case. Let's do this. I call di8s on Vriska style :::: )

~Shiro

clearance only · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:04 am

Shiroooooooo
vote for cakesssssssss

-S

Xkfyu · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:12 am

In post 359, Cookie Bakers wrote:What reason would have scum to crump vig in a very bleh way? Why assume illogical scum over dumb town?

Mostly because he's avoiding the question, which is always scummy to me.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:21 am

In post 356, Shiro wrote:
In post 353, Xkfyu wrote:And if beeboy is trying to soft claim Vigilante, then all the more reason to lynch him.

Ok uhm wtf? Did you just say all the more ro lynch someone who you think might be sifting pro town role?

Picking up alt slip for you Shiro.

Hey, beeboy, you claiming vig like for real or is this just a trumped up charge against you?

Davsto · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:48 am

gah, need to catch up here, but honestly it can wait until after piano lesson, should be posting in a few hours

Mirhawk · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 6:58 am

In post 353, Xkfyu wrote:
Yeah, his V key clearly works, and I have a serious distaste for questions to go unanswered. Hence why I prefer the beeboy lynch over the Cakez lynch, right now.

And if beeboy is trying to soft claim Vigilante, then all the more reason to lynch him.

I would guess he uses more than one device to post. Computer and phone most likely.

In post 308, Phoenix Wright wrote:
He has literally one post. I wasn't aware he was even in the game until the vote count. Seems like he's trying to hide

I was initially thinking this wasn't a big thing since it's not that uncommon to have a flaker at the beginning of the game.
Did a quick check and found out that he is active in places that aren't here.
Total scumlurk.

Shiro · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:05 am

@MOD This head will be V/LA because my dad is going to the hospital and I will be there. Don't know how long it will be.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:10 am

In post 365, Shiro wrote:
@MOD This head will be V/LA because my dad is going to the hospital and I will be there. Don't know how long it will be.

Cookie Bakers · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:11 am

I got you Shiro.

Radja · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:48 am

In post 233, Phoenix Wright wrote:
In post 231, Radja wrote:What the hell are you talking about. I never said you were town.

I said "scratch that last question" because Dwlee had explained it by then.

I misread it. You said scratch that last post and I thought you were talking about the post 217. Sorry

@mirhawk I was waiting for more posts from them to see if they still seemed scummy or not. What are your reads?

Seriously, the way you tried to push me over this, feels like scum grasping at straws to lose the focus on them.
What were you even thinking bringing this up?

Radja · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:57 am

In post 292, Cookie Bakers wrote:VOTE: Toog

Dwlee, let's do this. Dave still registers as null. Shiro and I both have gut feels here.

This needs some explaining. I was starting to like Toogeloo and the pressure he put on beeboy.

Radja · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 7:59 am

In post 297, clearance only wrote:Radja's catch up was a bit underwhelming but felt town enough.

I'm sorry. I do tend to underwhelm. I'll try harder.

Which head was this?

Davsto · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:00 am

catch-up go

am a lot further behind than i thought

oops

Radja · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:01 am

In post 300, clearance only wrote:
In post 273, SirCakez wrote:
In post 257, Dwlee99 wrote:Their V key is broken, toog.

Why was this the only thing you said when you popped in then popped out?

I'm sorry you rolled scum this game, cakes.

You're going to have to explain this. I am still townreading Cakez.

Radja · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:11 am

In post 347, Phoenix Wright wrote:
In post 345, SirCakez wrote:
In post 343, Phoenix Wright wrote:@sircakes I just noticed something. You've said that my logic for unvoting cleavage was bad and you've said that you don't like my posts, but you never explained why you don't like them or why you think I'm scum. You just said my posts are bad. That's not really an explanation

Pretty sure I did explain whatever I said was bad. Quote what I didn't explain?

I notice that you didn't deny that you never explained why you think I'm scum.

As soon as Cakez gets some heat, here's Phoenix who joins in with a bad argument. Can we lynch this?

Phoenix Wright · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:18 am

In post 373, Radja wrote:
In post 347, Phoenix Wright wrote:
In post 345, SirCakez wrote:
In post 343, Phoenix Wright wrote:@sircakes I just noticed something. You've said that my logic for unvoting cleavage was bad and you've said that you don't like my posts, but you never explained why you don't like them or why you think I'm scum. You just said my posts are bad. That's not really an explanation

Pretty sure I did explain whatever I said was bad. Quote what I didn't explain?

I notice that you didn't deny that you never explained why you think I'm scum.

As soon as Cakez gets some heat, here's Phoenix who joins in with a bad argument. Can we lynch this?

Can we lynch you? You're essentially saying that if someone seems suspicious I shouldn't grill them. It's not like I'm even voting him. You said before that it seems like I'm grasping for any little thing to attack but you're the one who is doing that