In post 550, iraonavp wrote: In post 549, Extrapolated Eagle wrote: In post 548, iraonavp wrote:Extrapolated Eagle, can you summarize why you think Raskolnikov is scum-aligned?
I'm not sure why you seem to believe this.
Again: fluff, OMGUS and avoiding game/thread. The guy reads straight up fake.
Really, those things are not very alignment indicative. I struggle to see how you can develop such a strong read from such trivial things.
I see no reason why either alignment can post things like
59. I remember seeing something on the wiki saying that OMGUS was actually a slight town-aligned tell, but I can't find it again. I prefer not to think of things in that kind of way anyway. I'd say that I've avoided the thread too, and I'm town-aligned.
Your reads don't seem to be at all flexible, it's as if you decided who to tunnel in your first post.
Wrong. Fluff is far more often coming from scum than town, as is commitment issues. Go read the wiki article on iioa and then ask yourself why scum would post analysis. Same reasoning behind just fluffing.
Omgus is also much more often from scum. Not talking about anything that says "oh this person is scum" after person voted them, I'm talking coming up with BS reasons to vote//push someone.
Go read YCBA if you don't believe me. Klingon horribad OMGUS have yet to see bad omgus from town in this site.
"Oh you have a read and it hasn't changed since the beginning of the day you're inflexible" is the most bs sentence I've heard in quite a while. Really? How is scum reading someone and then not having a town read on them appear put of nowhere a normal thing to do? Since when is "inflexible" even a freaking thing?
But I'll make a long case on him if you'd like. But this feels quite a bit like elyse in ycba imo