In post 79, OceanWind wrote:Mn has been posting reads and scumhunting even if he's not explaining his actions. He is taking in new information and adapting his reads as the game progresses. Early reads are often gut-based and intuitive. There's often not a well-developed logical explanation for them. So, I don't care if he's can't explain a page one read. He may not be scumhunting in the way that most people like and has an unconventional approach. This makes him an easy target.
What in any of mn's posts make you think he's adapting his reads? I can see him moving his vote but I don't see ANY logic behind them, and certainly not what I would call "well-developed."
And if we're policy-lynching anyone, it's Captain Capital Letters over there.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
