pbpa desisted; Part A...
The first half of the game, pages 1-5....
If the mason know each other to be town, and have no other abilities, they can all roleclaim and vouch for one another without ramification right? Or have I misconceived the mason role?
Vote: Eyceking
My spidey senses are tingling.
436 was a noob mistake.
Fine here.
Whoa, didn't realize SPAG was playing.
For taking so long to get Mini 490 started (ironically named Speed Mafia):
Vote SPAG
Random vote #2. fine.
Jenter, you forgot to bold your vote.
Vote: The Deepfried Ninja
I'll BW vote you to hell.
Ok, yet another random vote...
Vote: Janter
Bandwagoned, bitch.
Awfully keen on BWing.
Vote: Head_Honcho
You better start talking.
Was this a joke? It's pretty darn agressive fo a pg1 question about why he keeps second voting.
Vote: Paradoxombie for neglecting the bold faced type.
Still random...
Nonetheless, I'd really like for the activity to pick up in this thread.
Let's see if I can spark some discussion here:
Unvote; Vote: Headbanana
Go ahead, call me scummy.
Um... why will another random vote in the middle of page 2 make activity better?
Unvote
FoS: Trumpezia
Didn't like the idea of you popping in all of a sudden to slap one on IH. He didn't understand Jenter (neither did I, for that matter). Since when was ignorance scummy?
Right we seem to be getting serious here, he does have a very minor point.
From Head Honcho;
Guys if the day never ends we can all live in harmony.
Why are you so anxious for the day to end? Can't wait to use your NK, scum?
And since you're not exactly contributing anything here, how do you expect us to get moving?
Vote: Head_Honcho
wtf? He gives a point against Trumpezia and FoSes, then actually votes for a rather offhand comment? Bias sees I here.
Eyceking wrote:
Vote: Head_Honcho for his comment about everything "being so hard".
You took him seriously even with the gun-cleaning witticism in there?
Unbelievable.
Unvote; Vote: Eyceking
Hmm interesting. He failed to remove his vote on H_H for 2 posts after the gun cleaning witticism, then next page turns round and calls it unbelievable that someone took it seriously.
Head_Honcho wrote:
I'm inclined to agree, but was worried about getting accused of OMGUSing. Well, if I'm not the only one that finds it fishy.
Ok, right now I'm ridiculously suspicious of Head_Honcho. First there was his post 41, and now this? Some explaning is in order here.
Unvote; Vote: Head_Honcho
Then turns back round and says post 41 was suspicious again.
As much as I hate to say this, I'm not convinced you're the lynch for today.
Unvote
Fails to elaborate on why not or indeed and somewhat more importantly why he 'hates to say' it.
Ok, Jenter, you can take that vote off yourself now. I'm more than convinced you're just trying too hard to act town ("Oh look! My vote was still on myself! What a silly town thing to do, as scum would never do that.")
I was going to mention it earlier, but thought I'd wait a while longer.
Unvote; Vote: Jenter
Right now I'm convinced at least one of the following is scum:
trumpezia, Jenter, Kison, Eyceking
Why did he wait a while longer? Why not reveal things he had noticed that would in his opinion be helpful to town?
Yes I have been rather jumpy, but I think my most recent vote on Jenter is here to stay.
Right so now he says he's 'locked on' as it were. On page 4 in a 12 man game? eh wut?
Nice of you to join in, slash. Now, are you going to contribute some content, or should I just vote you the fuck out because I'm tired of the lurking and inactivity.
He then says he is considering BWing lurkers... BAAD. There's such thing as a prod ya know...
I will here quote Kison on two very good points;
The thing about d3sisted is not his vote hopping. The problem I have with him starts with this post :
d3sisted wrote:
As much as I hate to say this, I'm not convinced you're the lynch for today.
Unvote
So let me get this straight : an early game vote had you somewhat convinced that Head Honcho was the lynch for the day, but after a 1-liner rebuttal, you are from that point on no longer convinced of this?
Quote:
Right now I'm convinced at least one of the following is scum:
trumpezia, Jenter, Kison, Eyceking
You hardly have a case against any of the people you listed. You said this during page four of the game. How can you be convinced that one of the people you named is scum? We're not anywhere near far enough into the game for you to be convinced of anything. If you magically are, please give a decent reason for it. As far as I recall, I myself only made one post up until this point. If that's damning evidence, along with whatever you have against the other two, then I'd be a wonderful scum killer in all of my games.
And the reply;
Just because I didn't provide reasons, doesn't mean I changed votes because of his one-liner rebuttal. Don't get presumptuous here.
Those 4 make up the player list minus the pro-town ones. I don't see the need for bringing up cases unless I'm backing up a vote.
Ok, I think "convinced" was the wrong word to use here. There's a lot less certainty than it sounds. I don't really know a good word for that.
BTW, I know you're just trying to mimic Jenter's 80 so you can blow it way out of proportion.
Aside from that, Jenter and Gator's posts didn't sit well with me at all. It seems like they're getting ready to pounce onto the wagon soon as it hits the 2 or 3 mark.
a) Why didn't you provide reasons? TOWNIES HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE FROM THE TOWN.
b) Try 'I think' or 'I believe'or similar.
I may not be able to do pages 6-10 until friday, but that's a few points jotted down there.
