Open 28 - Quack Mafia. OVER! But who won? before 466

[curiouskarmadog]

Anyone else disagree with the no-lynch enough to vote for me? This is important, relevant info.

please quick dodgint my question

[curiouskarmadog]

edit

dodging..


how will a no lynch help us eliminate scum?

[JDodge]

edit

dodging..


how will a no lynch help us eliminate scum?

I'll answer this after my question is answered. I have my reasons.

[curiouskarmadog]

did you have a question for me?

[JDodge]

did you have a question for me?

Nope, a question for everyone else.

[curiouskarmadog]

Anyone else disagree with the no-lynch enough to vote for me? This is important, relevant info.

you assume that your "no-lynch" idea was the only reason I voted for you?

[JDodge]

Anyone else disagree with the no-lynch enough to vote for me? This is important, relevant info.

you assume that your "no-lynch" idea was the only reason I voted for you?

No, but it's what pushed you over the edge.

[curiouskarmadog]

well that is true, but your question "is a no-lynch idea enough to vote for me"..it seems to suggest that if people vote for you, it is solely based on that, which is not true...

so, is "the no lynch" enough to vote for you? Of course not. Is the facts of who you claimed to protect, who protected you (and the result), and your Day 1 actions (plus the no lynch) enough to vote for you? Yes....

I would still be voting for you if SSF hadnt jumped on so quickly after my vote.

[Stewie]

Anyone else disagree with the no-lynch enough to vote for me? This is important, relevant info.

Depends. As it stands (ie: with no explanation) yes, it is. I'm not going to do so yet, because it seems that you do have an explanation, and I'd like to hear it first.

[somestrangeflea]

I would still be voting for you if SSF hadnt jumped on so quickly after my vote.

I'd like to hear the thought process behind this...

Unless it's something along the lines of "BANDWAGON = BADBADBAD", in which case, don't bother.

[JDodge]

well that is true, but your question "is a no-lynch idea enough to vote for me"..it seems to suggest that if people vote for you, it is solely based on that, which is not true...

so, is "the no lynch" enough to vote for you? Of course not. Is the facts of who you claimed to protect, who protected you (and the result), and your Day 1 actions (plus the no lynch) enough to vote for you? Yes....

I would still be voting for you if SSF hadnt jumped on so quickly after my vote.

EVERYONE PROTECTED ME AND I DIDN'T DIE

THUS I MUST BE SCUM

GOOD FUCKING LOGIC THERE

I PROTECTED PEOPLE I DIDN'T HAVE A GOOD READ ON BECAUSE I THOUGHT I MIGHT BE A QUACK

THUS I MUST BE SCUM

MORE EXCELLENT LOGIC

[JDodge]

I would still be voting for you if SSF hadnt jumped on so quickly after my vote.

I'd like to hear the thought process behind this...

Unless it's something along the lines of "BANDWAGON = BADBADBAD", in which case, don't bother.

Translation: If it's something that damns me, don't say it

[curiouskarmadog]

I PROTECTED PEOPLE I DIDN'T HAVE A GOOD READ ON BECAUSE I THOUGHT I MIGHT BE A QUACK

have a struck a nerve?

Umm, people, indicates you protected more than one...no, you protected mert/ssf which is the same player both nights...also, why do you think you might be a quack? Did something occur to make you believe so?

[JDodge]

I PROTECTED PEOPLE I DIDN'T HAVE A GOOD READ ON BECAUSE I THOUGHT I MIGHT BE A QUACK

have a struck a nerve?

Umm, people, indicates you protected more than one...no, you protected mert/ssf which is the same player both nights...also, why do you think you might be a quack? Did something occur to make you believe so?

Mert was a random choice.

That was worded poorly; I meant that I was being cautious of being a quack.

[curiouskarmadog]

I would still be voting for you if SSF hadnt jumped on so quickly after my vote.

I'd like to hear the thought process behind this...

Unless it's something along the lines of "BANDWAGON = BADBADBAD", in which case, don't bother.

I didnt like your vote..you just cast it without asking any questions..no follow up nothing...it came too quick and made me uneasy..

[curiouskarmadog]

I PROTECTED PEOPLE I DIDN'T HAVE A GOOD READ ON BECAUSE I THOUGHT I MIGHT BE A QUACK

have a struck a nerve?

Umm, people, indicates you protected more than one...no, you protected mert/ssf which is the same player both nights...also, why do you think you might be a quack? Did something occur to make you believe so?

Mert was a random choice.

That was worded poorly; I meant that I was being cautious of being a quack.

you are right, Mert was a random choice...so you chose SSF, night 1 because you were sure about her alignment? What does that mean? You didnt want to kill town, if you were a quack? All day Day 1, you pushed an invisible case against Indy(tar)...why didnt your "protection" go there?

[JDodge]

I can't prove whether or not I'm a quack by protecting scum

[curiouskarmadog]

so why not protect someone that you thought was the most protown?

[JDodge]

so why not protect someone that you thought was the most protown?

Because if I was a quack, I would kill them.

THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK PLZ

[somestrangeflea]

Translation: If it's something that damns me, don't say it

"Bandwagon = bad" is crap reasoning. How can I be damned by someone else's CrapLogic?

I didnt like your vote..you just cast it without asking any questions..no follow up nothing...

it came too quick

and made me uneasy..

Too quick? 36 hours later? Seriously?

[JDodge]

Translation: If it's something that damns me, don't say it

"Bandwagon = bad" is crap reasoning. How can I be damned by someone else's CrapLogic?

Bandwagon = bad since we're pretty much in lylo. Think please.

BTW, the scum is CKD, Flea and Tar. CKD's comment about quickness is him covering his own ass because Flea misunderstood and tried to quicklynch. Scum is most likely to want a lynch today, since they essentially win if they get a lynch. Thus their real reason for voting me is not because they feel no-lynch is a bad idea, but that they don't want to go through another day (and thus FORCE people to lynch someone whom they have no control over the lynch of) and I am a convenient target using their craplogic.

Tar is scum for the way Indy acted.

Unvote, vote: CKD

[Dasquian]

Still here, still haven't caught up (sorry) - I'll try to do so within the next 24 hours.

[curiouskarmadog]

wow, so you want to go around in circles or you are backtracking..

I ask you in post 615:

so you chose SSF, night 1 because you were sure about her alignment? What does that mean? You didnt want to kill town, if you were a quack? All day Day 1, you pushed an invisible case against Indy(tar)...why didnt your "protection" go there?

I can't prove whether or not I'm a quack by protecting scum

which means you didnt target Indy(tar) because you wanted to find out if you were scum or not.

so I ask you

so why not protect someone that you thought was the most protown?

because you obviously want to know if you are scum or not (as you stated THAT was your reason you did not target Tar for protection)

but you return with more insults.

so why not protect someone that you thought was the most protown?

Because if I was a quack, I would kill them.

THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK PLZ

so tell me again, why you did not target Indy(Tar)?

vote Jdodge...

for backtracking, for crap logic circles, and for pushing a no lynch today..

I also now am pretty sure that Indy/Tar is one of your scum buddies.

[JDodge]

IF INDY/TAR IS SCUM (HE IS), I WOULD NOT HAVE KILLED HIM, MAKING THE EXERCISE POINTLESS.

I DID NOT WANT TO KILL THE MOST PRO-TOWN PERSON IF I WAS A QUACK. DUMBASS.

You're grasping at fucking straws, and the retardedness of it is really pissing me off.

[curiouskarmadog]

Translation: If it's something that damns me, don't say it

"Bandwagon = bad" is crap reasoning. How can I be damned by someone else's CrapLogic?

Bandwagon = bad since we're pretty much in lylo. Think please.

BTW, the scum is CKD, Flea and Tar. CKD's comment about quickness is him covering his own ass because Flea misunderstood and tried to quicklynch. Scum is most likely to want a lynch today, since they essentially win if they get a lynch. Thus their real reason for voting me is not because they feel no-lynch is a bad idea, but that they don't want to go through another day (and thus FORCE people to lynch someone whom they have no control over the lynch of) and I am a convenient target using their craplogic.

Tar is scum for the way Indy acted.

Unvote, vote: CKD

ohhh, look, a vote AND he knows who the 3 scum are. I guess he no longer feels a no lynch is good..more backpedalling.

so the only people who do want a lynch today is scum? LOL I want to lynch scum today AND tomorrow....FOR THE FOURTH TIME, how does no lynching today help us elminate scum? It only eliminates a a townie tonight, and we will bein the exact same place tomorrow.

Oh, and again, please, what is Tar's case? How has he acted..seems he agrees with you today..

Also, anybody wonder why Tar has not questioned Jdodge's case against him once?..Also, anybody wonder why Tar thinks a no-lynch is a good idea?
these are 2 of our scum.