Mafia 70: Traditional - Game over!

[ZONEACE]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]Could you make the font size huge? otherwise it's so hard to read your caps...[/quote]

EAT ME KSCOPE

Better?

[ZONEACE]

Are you implying accusations you have made have any logic? If they do, you are yet to state it. Please do so.

you read my post genius, my original thoughts on sim, niv and lemming had logic.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

EAT ME KSCOPE

Better?

Yes, thank you. I think that deserves an

Unvote

Anyone willing to bribe my vote for today?

[Sir Tornado]

I FOS'd him because while the case against him was unlikely it WAS STILL POSSIBLE. I FOS people who appear to me as possible scum, and he was possibly scum, unlikely, BUT STILL POSSSIBLE.

This is stupid. It is possible for EVERYONE to be scum in some or other unlikely way.

[Sir Tornado]

I read it. Explain how is it "logical" for the scum to out two of their members as masons and expect to get away with it in a game this size.

Did you actually make a case against Lemming? Where?

[ZONEACE]

yeah im done trying to make you see the truth cause YOU CLEARLY DON'T WANT TO.

so you have fun tornado and when you lose, don't look at me, you have no one to blame but yourself.

[Flameaxe]

Well assuming the bandwagon on Hmrox was a counter-wagon to the one on you, the only motivation for that wagon would be if you were scum, being protected. So it made sense to go after you first.

*cough*

Flameaxe didn't come under any pressure though. It was a completely random, unreasoned bandwagon.

Even the person who I voted declared it was a pointless wagon with no reasoning.

Also, that person hasn't posted for about a week as well...

[Sir Tornado]

This is the game I'm referring to. Just filter it down to ZONEACE's posts, it won't take you long to flick through.

I flicked through it and can confirm that Zoneace acted like this in capacity of a role equivalent to town in that game. Need to see whether he plays like this as mafia too.

[Flameaxe]

Basically EXACTLY like that game...

[Sir Tornado]

yeah im done trying to make you see the truth cause YOU CLEARLY DON'T WANT TO.

so you have fun tornado and when you lose, don't look at me, you have no one to blame but yourself.

You are not even trying to "make me see truth". As you are indeed playing this game for a long time, you should know that appealing to emotion and typing in all caps does not help convince others that you are pro town. It certainly does not convince me.

[Sir Tornado]

Basically EXACTLY like that game...

Er... no. Although he was a mafia goon in that game, the mafia was actually "The Town"

[ZONEACE]

viewtopic.php?t=261&highlight=
theres one

viewtopic.php?t=308&highlight=
another


Ive not been mafia many times so finding examples is hard

[Sir Tornado]

Yamahako, Celtic18 and Beastly need to post more. K-Scope needs to post more meaningful content.

[ZONEACE]

crap, i messed up that tag. could someone (like the mod) fix that please?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Can't. I'm on auto-pilot.

[Sir Tornado]

viewtopic.php?t=261&highlight=
theres one

[url]http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... highlight=[/ur]
another


Ive not been mafia many times so finding examples is hard

Unvote

[Simenon]

Please switch your votes to Yamahako and not someone so distracting, thanks.

[Zeppo]

It was clear where the day was headed. I was going to fall victim to a baseless lynch pushed by atleast one (and likely more) member of the mafia. the original votes i got, if you'll go back and look, were without merit, by people trying to throw suspicion off of themselves.

The lynch was hardly "baseless". The first vote against you was Simeonon's because you accused him and Niv of being scum

and

making up the entire masonic lodge. (Post 106)

I'm quite an inexperienced player so perhaps someone can correct me. But in a 12 man game surely making up a five man lodge is an extremely risky thing for the scum to do? What if there actually was a lodge? All five of the actual masons would have alarm bells set off because they would have reason to suspect the other lodge of being phoney (this is the bit I want clarification on: are two lodges in a 12 man game common?). The real masons would then coordinate during the night any easily lynch whover claimed to be in the fake-lodge. Either way making up a lodge is a huge gamble.

The next couple of votes on you were bandwagony but you can't just claim the whole suspicion of you was trumped up. You have to argue your case without throwing threats about everywhere.

I'm not sure if you're scum or not. To be honest, I don't really care. Either you are scum and therefore are a good lynch or you're just such such a bad townie at this point that lynching you in day 1 might actually be beneficial to the town in the long run because you won't confuse matters for the rest of the game.

FoS: Zoneace

Either make a good case why I shouldn't vote for you with your next post or I will.

[ZONEACE]

unvote VOTE ZEPPO

clearly you haven't been paying attention, what makes you think you're so special that you deserve some sort of extra argument when i've already made my case.

i think it should be clear that at this point anyone voting me is to be looked at with suspicion.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

What a self confident scum, don't you think Zeppo?

[Zeppo]

Zoneace, how badly you're playing this game continues to flaw me. I stated quite clearly that the reasoning you had given, which I quoted, was that you were victim of a basless bandwagon pushed by scum.

I pointed out that the bandwagon wasn't baseless, Simenon had a good reason to vote for you. I even admitted that the following votes on you were slightly sus but you had to argue your case better than you have. Your failure to do this suggests to me that you are indeed scum. I don't see an OMGUS vote on me is doing you any good.

True to my word

Vote: Zoneace

[ZONEACE]

Zoneace, how badly you're playing this game continues to flaw me. I stated quite clearly that the reasoning you had given, which I quoted, was that you were victim of a basless bandwagon pushed by scum.

I pointed out that the bandwagon wasn't baseless, Simenon had a good reason to vote for you. I even admitted that the following votes on you were slightly sus but you had to argue your case better than you have. Your failure to do this suggests to me that you are indeed scum. I don't see an OMGUS vote on me is doing you any good.

True to my word

Vote: Zoneace

and your voting for me indicates that you clearly have no clue what you're doing.

[Sir Tornado]

and your voting for me indicates that you clearly have no clue what you're doing.

How do you know he does not have any clue as to what he is doing?

[ZONEACE]

because he's voting for me. OBVI

[Sir Tornado]

because he's voting for me. OBVI

And you aren't voting him?