In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
Why do you continuously call the pisskop slot scum but NEVER vote it?
iI voted almost to motivate him to answer the questions. He still hasn't. Also, I realized that since he's leading my wagon now he's probably not town. As for pisskop, a vote on him would do nothing just like my RC vote did nothing. I'm not going to vote for someone if nothing will come of it
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
Important announcement:
I'm having dinner with some friends (at Fender's), and I was wondering if I should invite a certain someone. They call it the Dinner for Winners, and I just know He will win the first prize hands down.
/end announcement.
Now here's something to ponder: WHO am I thinking of inviting? Why is that?
If you know the answer, please keep it to yourself, as there are exactly 0 good reasons for you to point them out. Not only that pointing them out may result in an unwanted flame war in the thread, but you doing it may get you involved in said flame war yourself, which is guaranteed to be the least beneficial thing to do in this game.
Just count to ten, take a deep breath and move on. And remember: Patience is a virtue.
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
In post 1656, Almost50 wrote:Important announcement:
I'm having dinner with some friends (at Fender's), and I was wondering if I should invite a certain someone. They call it the Dinner for Winners, and I just know He will win the first prize hands down.
/end announcement.
Now here's something to ponder: WHO am I thinking of inviting? Why is that?
If you know the answer, please keep it to yourself, as there are exactly 0 good reasons for you to point them out. Not only that pointing them out may result in an unwanted flame war in the thread, but you doing it may get you involved in said flame war yourself, which is guaranteed to be the least beneficial thing to do in this game.
Just count to ten, take a deep breath and move on. And remember: Patience is a virtue.
I'll give you just one reason for now. I would rather concentrate on BS though before we move on to the next contestant on the show.
This is from my "text file" where I keep track of my personal remarks on players:
GR #123: Why would a third party scum do that?
Why not one of the main scum group?
They basically considered the possibility of me being a VT (as per my claim), a PR trying to survive longer, or a 3rd party scum. So, why don't I fit into the "main scum group"?? And I think we know (at least to a 95% certainty) we do not have a "scum" 3rd party (just one kill per night). I took this to be a scum-slip from a member of the "main scum group".
Everybody just thinks i'm fekin scum.
@Almos50 What? How about a mafia traitor? Are you seriously suggesting that I'm mafia because I did not put down "He could be part of the main scum group?"
The reasoning behind my thinking was, why would someone of the main scum group want to attract attention to themselves? It doesn't make sense in my eyes unless there taking a huge gambit.
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
Because where is the town motive to doing that?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
In post 1656, Almost50 wrote:Important announcement:
I'm having dinner with some friends (at Fender's), and I was wondering if I should invite a certain someone. They call it the Dinner for Winners, and I just know He will win the first prize hands down.
/end announcement.
Now here's something to ponder: WHO am I thinking of inviting? Why is that?
If you know the answer, please keep it to yourself, as there are exactly 0 good reasons for you to point them out. Not only that pointing them out may result in an unwanted flame war in the thread, but you doing it may get you involved in said flame war yourself, which is guaranteed to be the least beneficial thing to do in this game.
Just count to ten, take a deep breath and move on. And remember: Patience is a virtue.
In post 1659, Golden Robster wrote:The reasoning behind my thinking was, why would someone of the main scum group want to attract attention to themselves? It doesn't make sense in my eyes unless there taking a huge gambit.
But 3rd party scum would be totally fine with attracting attention onto themselves? Get the hell out of here with that.
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
Because where is the town motive to doing that?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
where is the town motive of allowing yourself to OMGUS anyone who lynches you?
In post 1659, Golden Robster wrote:The reasoning behind my thinking was, why would someone of the main scum group want to attract attention to themselves? It doesn't make sense in my eyes unless there taking a huge gambit.
But 3rd party scum would be totally fine with attracting attention onto themselves? Get the hell out of here with that.
VOTE: Golden Robster
Hah. If it resulted in the third party surviving and a sudden shift in momentum from lynching them to someone else then yeah.
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
Because where is the town motive to doing that?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
where is the town motive of allowing yourself to OMGUS anyone who lynches you?
^ is not referring to you, its referring to blackstar who did indeed do that.
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
Because where is the town motive to doing that?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
where is the town motive of allowing yourself to OMGUS anyone who lynches you?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
In post 1659, Golden Robster wrote:The reasoning behind my thinking was, why would someone of the main scum group want to attract attention to themselves? It doesn't make sense in my eyes unless there taking a huge gambit.
But 3rd party scum would be totally fine with attracting attention onto themselves? Get the hell out of here with that.
VOTE: Golden Robster
Hah. If it resulted in the third party surviving and a sudden shift in momentum from lynching them to someone else then yeah.
The exact same thing could be said about the Mafia group.
In post 1580, BlackStar wrote:Everyone please individually lay out your case against me.
So far Almost is the only one who has attempted to do this. If I'm such obvious scum, you guys shouldn't have trouble laying out a solid case, right? Just saying that I need to scum hunt more isn't a case
but setting it up so you have the option to OMGUS anyone who votes you is indeed a case.
You sure?
I'd like to hear the logic behind that statement. Convince me that that is a valid scum case.
Because where is the town motive to doing that?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
where is the town motive of allowing yourself to OMGUS anyone who lynches you?
So, do you really not know how logic works? Or are you just avoiding my request?
In post 1659, Golden Robster wrote:The reasoning behind my thinking was, why would someone of the main scum group want to attract attention to themselves? It doesn't make sense in my eyes unless there taking a huge gambit.
But 3rd party scum would be totally fine with attracting attention onto themselves? Get the hell out of here with that.
VOTE: Golden Robster
Hah. If it resulted in the third party surviving and a sudden shift in momentum from lynching them to someone else then yeah.
The exact same thing could be said about the Mafia group.
Why are we arguing over pointless speculation at most?
No. No it's not. If you find something scummy, then there must be some logical reason behind it, and "because I can't see town motivation in it" is no kind of logical reason.
The absence of any apparent town motivation does not imply the existence of scum motivation (and vice versa). Can it not be the case that you simply can't think of any town motivation? Or are you so arrogant to believe that you are all-knowing, when it comes to everyone's town motivation?
Now, as I requested, I'd like to hear your logic that validates this:
In post 1659, Golden Robster wrote:The reasoning behind my thinking was, why would someone of the main scum group want to attract attention to themselves? It doesn't make sense in my eyes unless there taking a huge gambit.
But 3rd party scum would be totally fine with attracting attention onto themselves? Get the hell out of here with that.
VOTE: Golden Robster
Hah. If it resulted in the third party surviving and a sudden shift in momentum from lynching them to someone else then yeah.
The exact same thing could be said about the Mafia group.
Why are we arguing over pointless speculation at most?
It's certainly not pointless, and I'm still on the fence about it being speculation.
However, I have noted that you are quickly trying to end the conversation.