In post 1740, Papa Zito wrote:Oh shit it's Davsto. I'm probably going to wagon you at some point this is gr8.
;-;
In post 1740, Papa Zito wrote:Oh shit it's Davsto. I'm probably going to wagon you at some point this is gr8.
Yeah, as in when I read BBT'S ISO, I got the feeling they were linked.In post 1741, lilith2013 wrote:@Aristo: can you explain what you meant by "Mario is scummy by association"?
In post 1745, lilith2013 wrote:Gah zito your tags messed up my tags
In post 1744, lilith2013 wrote:
DGB was on the BBT wagon fairly early. But then right before he got lynched, she quoted him and said "this is a townie sentiment." but made no argument against his lynch/didn't try to push us off the wagon/didn't unvote.
In post 1750, Davsto wrote:In post 1740, Papa Zito wrote:Oh shit it's Davsto. I'm probably going to wagon you at some point this is gr8.
;-;
In post 1713, Papa Zito wrote:There's a lot of people going "X is scum vote plz" but nobody seems able to articulate why. That may be a hint to stop, wait a minute, fill my cup, put some liquor in it.
Can someone, anyone, give me a "well zito my good man, X is scum cuz of these excellent reasons: A, B, C"
just give me something to work with here
anything
ilu?
In post 1752, Papa Zito wrote:In post 1745, lilith2013 wrote:Gah zito your tags messed up my tags
I KNOW I KNOW SORRY
btw your avatar scares the shit out of me
In post 1744, lilith2013 wrote:
DGB was on the BBT wagon fairly early. But then right before he got lynched, she quoted him and said "this is a townie sentiment." but made no argument against his lynch/didn't try to push us off the wagon/didn't unvote.
I'm p sure this is your post.
That is weird. I think it'd be shadier if he'd flipped town tho.@DGBwhat's up with this?
In post 1754, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 1713, Papa Zito wrote:There's a lot of people going "X is scum vote plz" but nobody seems able to articulate why. That may be a hint to stop, wait a minute, fill my cup, put some liquor in it.
Can someone, anyone, give me a "well zito my good man, X is scum cuz of these excellent reasons: A, B, C"
just give me something to work with here
anything
ilu?
well elbirn is making up reasons to scumread me?
and when one of his reasons is proved as blatant bs he says "nvm i was just being snarky"?
ALSO HOLY PEDITS
I'll give you that West was less of a wagon vote, but only because it is wholly unexplained. Which isn't any better really.In post 1740, Papa Zito wrote:Oh shit it's Davsto. I'm probably going to wagon you at some point this is gr8.
In post 1723, Aristophanes wrote:A) No, I don't. If they were merely sheeping occasionally, sure. But she seems to be sheeping for the sake of sheeping and floating through. This isn't adding a vote to add pressure. There is no gain noted by DGB. She just wagons willy nilly.
So it looks like she was super early on the West9 wagon based on the votecount, and she doesn't seem inclined to join this Mario one. Wouldn't that signal she's not just merely sheeping votes?
Also I'm not sure the "no gain" bit is true - it looks like she jumped onto the BBT wagon super early and that was a scumflip. No?
Ari wrote:B) To a certain extent, yes. But being nauseated does not preclude someone from adding a line that says "why I made this read/vote is ___."
That simple effort is all it takes and is what I would expect from a town mindset. This is absent here.
Well I dunno if anyone asked the question.
@DGB:Why did you vote West9?
pedit: holy avalanche of posts batman
In post 1747, Aristophanes wrote:What do you think of my recent DGB case?
In post 1744, lilith2013 wrote:why does my avatar scare you
In post 1757, lilith2013 wrote:Can you quote these posts where he did those things
In post 1723, Aristophanes wrote:She said herself she was sheeping with the BBT vote, as I said. She makes no case and has no read, other than that one late "townpost" comment, and thus no accountability on any wagon.
In post 1705, acryon wrote:In post 1682, Anxiety Attack wrote:In post 1638, acryon wrote:And this is my point. You say Mario can do both lurk and post erratically as scum, so how can you say a game matches his scum meta when even his scum meta isn't definitive.
Cus meta is not only about their posting style its about mindsets
1) Meta is bad, and 2) Even if it's about mindsets, my point still stands that your reasoning has numerous flaws. It assumes that Mario posts erratically only as scum which is 1) unlikely and 2) you have no evidence to back up. If you want to talk about the mindset, fine. Tell me why post X is coming from scum, why posts Y & Z look like posturing, etc.
Your argument sucks and I think you're better players than your argument is leading on.
VOTE: Anxiety Attack
Also, you STILL have not answered lillith's question, which is a valid one. If you're throwing out serious accusations, you'd have better have a reason behind it.
This Mario push is soft. The resistance in total to it is generally too soft for it to be an all-town wagon and the specific defenders are too blatant for them to be scum.
A vote switch at that point was too risky.In post 1760, Papa Zito wrote:holy shit this game hit Arriba Mode
In post 1744, lilith2013 wrote:why does my avatar scare you
I dunno it's just creepy O__O
In post 1757, lilith2013 wrote:Can you quote these posts where he did those things
stop making my words faster than I can :/
In post 1723, Aristophanes wrote:She said herself she was sheeping with the BBT vote, as I said. She makes no case and has no read, other than that one late "townpost" comment, and thus no accountability on any wagon.
True. I guess I'm asking about it given the results. Like, if she were scum with BBT why didn't she slide off the wagon at that point, esp given lack of accountability etc
In post 1761, Anxiety Attack wrote:In post 1705, acryon wrote:In post 1682, Anxiety Attack wrote:In post 1638, acryon wrote:And this is my point. You say Mario can do both lurk and post erratically as scum, so how can you say a game matches his scum meta when even his scum meta isn't definitive.
Cus meta is not only about their posting style its about mindsets
1) Meta is bad, and 2) Even if it's about mindsets, my point still stands that your reasoning has numerous flaws. It assumes that Mario posts erratically only as scum which is 1) unlikely and 2) you have no evidence to back up. If you want to talk about the mindset, fine. Tell me why post X is coming from scum, why posts Y & Z look like posturing, etc.
Your argument sucks and I think you're better players than your argument is leading on.
VOTE: Anxiety Attack
Also, you STILL have not answered lillith's question, which is a valid one. If you're throwing out serious accusations, you'd have better have a reason behind it.
This Mario push is soft. The resistance in total to it is generally too soft for it to be an all-town wagon and the specific defenders are too blatant for them to be scum.
You don't seem to realize how little I give a shit about your opinion. I'm going through hell in my personal life and I simply don't give a shit about this game. If ika cares, he can respond. I simply do not give a damn. If you lynch us, when we flip town, you need to die next. Other than that, don't fucking interact with me at all. Talk to ika.
~SW
In post 1765, Aristophanes wrote:^ I feel like I should point out that this is a good time to end this conversation. Otherwise tempers fly and flaming happens and people get hurt.
This is just a preemptive thought because I see this far too often in Mafia.
In post 1767, Anxiety Attack wrote:Acryon-Ask me whatever you want. If we are lynched, I want town to find the scum that jumped on us for NAI behavior. Like Papa Zito for example.
You can ISO and see we are town. Fuck your questions. I don't care.
What's so hard to understand about that? I do not care right now. ika is working all day. Maybe he'll feel like addressing this.
Or you can call this AtE, lynch us and we can hang out in the dead thread with Cheetory when we flip town.
I DON'T CARE. GET IT YET?
~SW
AA raises a good point.In post 1763, Papa Zito wrote:Arrite that's fair. I have some Qs out, let's see what shakes
VOTE: Anxiety Attack
In post 1770, Aristophanes wrote:AA raises a good point.In post 1763, Papa Zito wrote:Arrite that's fair. I have some Qs out, let's see what shakes
VOTE: Anxiety Attack
What makes the slot scummy and vote worthy?
In post 1752, Papa Zito wrote:That is weird. I think it'd be shadier if he'd flipped town tho. @DGB what's up with this?
Moreso at Zito, thus the quote.In post 1771, acryon wrote:In post 1770, Aristophanes wrote:AA raises a good point.In post 1763, Papa Zito wrote:Arrite that's fair. I have some Qs out, let's see what shakes
VOTE: Anxiety Attack
What makes the slot scummy and vote worthy?
Who is this directed at? If me, then 1705 is a succinct showing of why I think AA is scum. 1) Presenting arguments that the slot has enough experience to know better than try to push. 2) Dodging simple questions including an unwillingness to back up claim that I was trying to discredit them with their Spiffeh and Mario push.
I made a whole long post about you and got ignored.In post 1772, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 1752, Papa Zito wrote:That is weird. I think it'd be shadier if he'd flipped town tho. @DGB what's up with this?
It just wasn't enough for me to unvote.