⭐ Blitz 20 — How To Be Normal [Game Over]

[Marquis]

DAY 2. VOTECOUNT 03.

anyway here's


(0)

Ranger

—
(0)

Xtoxm

—

»

(1)

Some Random Mafia Player

— pisskop
(0)

Ankamius

—

»

(1)

The Bulge

— Nosferatu

»

(3)

Nosferatu

— Some Random Mafia Player, GuiltyLion, The Bulge

(L-2)

(0)

3dicerolling

—
(0)

pisskop

—
(0)

GuiltyLion

—

(4)

NOT VOTING

— Ranger, Xtoxm, Ankamius, 3dicerolling

With

9 alive

, it takes

5 votes

to lynch.

Deadline is in

(expired on 2016-01-28 15:30:00)

(Thu Jan 28 @ 3:30:00 PM EST).

NOTES.

hello. it me

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Not even a little amused at your dumbassery.

no, insults dont work

now, explain your xtoxm lynch, you havent yet

and you suddenly scumread me over one post?

[3dicerolling]

Meh, 21 hours may be enough for me to recover and re-read.

@pisskop - If you could elaborate on your xtomx and SRMP reads? This would also help me develop my read on you, so a solid answer would be fantastic.

[pisskop]

No Im good.

Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

No Im good.

Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.

ok, but you need reasoning on me lol, I made one post asking for reasoning and suddenly became your #1 scumread

[3dicerolling]

No Im good.

Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.

ok, but you need reasoning on me lol, I made one post asking for reasoning and suddenly became your #1 scumread

Why are you so concerned with his scumread on you?

[Some Random Mafia Player]

No Im good.

Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.

ok, but you need reasoning on me lol, I made one post asking for reasoning and suddenly became your #1 scumread

Why are you so concerned with his scumread on you?

Im not, im concerned with him suddenly scumreading me more than xtoxm for asking for reasoning (and even if I missed it, that still shouldent make me suddenly a bigger scumread then the guy he has been wanting lynched all game)

[3dicerolling]

Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?

I dont know, but I def dont see why he would do that (then again, he has been doing a lot of useless things)

[GuiltyLion]

Although, nosferatu is definitely off the table for today.

whyyyyy

SRMP is probscum but Nos is obvscum

[Ankamius]

No Im good.

Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.

Link for me?

[3dicerolling]

Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?

I dont know, but I def dont see why he would do that (then again, he has been doing a lot of useless things)

Have you ever played with pisskop before?

Although, nosferatu is definitely off the table for today.

whyyyyy

SRMP is probscum but Nos is obvscum

That's a great question for you. Why?

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?

I dont know, but I def dont see why he would do that (then again, he has been doing a lot of useless things)

Have you ever played with pisskop before?

Although, nosferatu is definitely off the table for today.

whyyyyy

SRMP is probscum but Nos is obvscum

That's a great question for you. Why?

no I havent, when this started it was my second game.

but that still isent an excuse to change a read off of 1 post.

[GuiltyLion]

are you serious 3dr, I've been saying this over and over

Nosferatu literally forgot the argument that he was making between 474 and 480. When accused of slipping about knowing who made the NK, his first instinct was to act like he never said that mafia made the kill, rather than justify

why

he thought mafia made the kill - which he had already done in 474, and did again in 498.

So when Nos made 480, instead of defending his belief, he tried to imply davesaz's push on his belief was incorrect. If he was town who assumed maf made the NK, he would have made 494 and 498 as a response to 475. Not 480. 480 is not a town mindset, it's a scum self-preservationist mindset.

to put in simpler terms, this is the dialogue and Nos' thought process between 464 and 498:
Nos (464): "lol at scum"
Davesaz (472): "?"
Nos (474): "maf obviously thought Almost was right about Karnage being SK"
Davesaz (475/476): "Why do you think maf made the NK?"
Nos (480): "I never said that."
SRMP (482): "yes you did, right here"
Nos (494): "Well it was obviously the maf kill"

as for SRMP, he's been pinging my scumdar the whole game, but that's more of a tone of his posts and contentless-questioning read. I think he's likely scum but he hasn't done anything as egregious as 480.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

I don't know what to make of Almost50 defending his townread on Ranger

It's not at all a valid reason to townread someone but when reading his posts I get the sense that he genuinely believes in it.

I can't tell if that's because he knows she's town or because he's a newbie. I would like Ranger's thoughts if she has them.

Meanwhile,

my scumvibes are back on SRMP

, especially given how he's hedging immediately on his throwing shade on pisskop. I just don't feel like he's genuinely trying to solve the game. His accusations are always on the basis of people not posting or not being helpful, as opposed to doing something that legitimately appears scum-motivated.

And I also think voting a player who was replaced (160) is more likely to come from scum trying to find a comfortable spot to vote rather than a town player keeping tabs on players in the game. Although I'm a bit hesitant because I would expect cautious scum to catch that mistake before they post.

how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)

[Some Random Mafia Player]

I don't know what to make of Almost50 defending his townread on Ranger

It's not at all a valid reason to townread someone but when reading his posts I get the sense that he genuinely believes in it.

I can't tell if that's because he knows she's town or because he's a newbie. I would like Ranger's thoughts if she has them.

Meanwhile,

my scumvibes are back on SRMP

, especially given how he's hedging immediately on his throwing shade on pisskop. I just don't feel like he's genuinely trying to solve the game. His accusations are always on the basis of people not posting or not being helpful, as opposed to doing something that legitimately appears scum-motivated.

And I also think voting a player who was replaced (160) is more likely to come from scum trying to find a comfortable spot to vote rather than a town player keeping tabs on players in the game. Although I'm a bit hesitant because I would expect cautious scum to catch that mistake before they post.

how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)

eh, this might have been a grammar error, but still want to point this out, especially since you said they were always on me twice.

[GuiltyLion]

how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)

they were gone for all of maybe 100 posts between 126 and 215

have you never doubted yourself on a scumread only to find yourself coming back to it when the player in question continues to look scummy?

I'm having a hard time believing you think this 'contradiction' means anything, or that you can't understand my thought process here.

[3dicerolling]

Are you proposing he is mafia who knew that wasn't their kill, or sk that knew that wasn't their kill?

Or are you just proposing nos is non-town aligned in general.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)

they were gone for all of maybe 100 posts between 126 and 215

have you never doubted yourself on a scumread only to find yourself coming back to it when the player in question continues to look scummy?

I'm having a hard time believing you think this 'contradiction' means anything, or that you can't understand my thought process here.

you just said I was on your scumdar all game, and now your saying I wasent for 100 posts.

Make up your mind lol

[GuiltyLion]

Are you proposing he is mafia who knew that wasn't their kill, or sk that knew that wasn't their kill?

Or are you just proposing nos is non-town aligned in general.

I think he could be either, so non-town aligned in general. Again, Nos assuming that the kill was a maf kill I don't really have a problem with. But 480 is just so inconsistent with what he had posted, and what he continued to post afterwards, that it looks like flailing scum panic defense over a minor slip. Bulge said it more concisely in 516

My existing scumread on SRMP combined with the way SRMP went about pushing on this as well - particularly 477 - makes me think SRMP and Nos are scum on two opposite factions.

SRMP, does it matter at all if I say "all game" instead of "the majority of the game except for roughly 100 posts early on"? Like does that distinction mean anything alignment indicative?

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Are you proposing he is mafia who knew that wasn't their kill, or sk that knew that wasn't their kill?

Or are you just proposing nos is non-town aligned in general.

I think he could be either, so non-town aligned in general. Again, Nos assuming that the kill was a maf kill I don't really have a problem with. But 480 is just so inconsistent with what he had posted, and what he continued to post afterwards, that it looks like flailing scum panic defense over a minor slip. Bulge said it more concisely in 516

My existing scumread on SRMP combined with the way SRMP went about pushing on this as well - particularly 477 - makes me think SRMP and Nos are scum on two opposite factions.

SRMP, does it matter at all if I say "all game" instead of "the majority of the game except for roughly 100 posts early on"? Like does that distinction mean anything alignment indicative?

I dont know if it does, but I find it interesting you say something, then say something making the original statement incorrect literally 2 posts later.

[GuiltyLion]

I dont know if it does, but I find it interesting you say something, then say something making the original statement incorrect literally 2 posts later.

okay whatever I'm fine with lynching SRMP if we aren't doing Nos today

[3dicerolling]

I'm sorry, I look over it tomorrow. I just can't really focus on logic right now :/

My gut is telling me he's town, and I don't think he would straight up dave as SK.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

I dont know if it does, but I find it interesting you say something, then say something making the original statement incorrect literally 2 posts later.

okay whatever I'm fine with lynching SRMP if we aren't doing Nos today

so you contradicting yourself is fine, but with Nos it isent?

This just seems rather odd.

[Nosferatu]

^ I mean tbh