anyway here's
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(4)
With
Deadline is in
In post 572, pisskop wrote:Not even a little amused at your dumbassery.
In post 578, pisskop wrote:No Im good.
Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.
In post 579, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 578, pisskop wrote:No Im good.
Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.
ok, but you need reasoning on me lol, I made one post asking for reasoning and suddenly became your #1 scumread
In post 580, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 579, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 578, pisskop wrote:No Im good.
Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.
ok, but you need reasoning on me lol, I made one post asking for reasoning and suddenly became your #1 scumread
Why are you so concerned with his scumread on you?
In post 582, 3dicerolling wrote:Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?
In post 569, 3dicerolling wrote:Although, nosferatu is definitely off the table for today.
In post 578, pisskop wrote:No Im good.
Im done here. Ive been asking all game for cases and Ive given my own before. Go be lazy on somebody elses time guiz kthnx.
In post 583, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 582, 3dicerolling wrote:Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?
I dont know, but I def dont see why he would do that (then again, he has been doing a lot of useless things)
In post 584, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 569, 3dicerolling wrote:Although, nosferatu is definitely off the table for today.
whyyyyy
SRMP is probscum but Nos is obvscum
In post 586, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 583, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 582, 3dicerolling wrote:Do you think that makes him more likely to be scum?
I dont know, but I def dont see why he would do that (then again, he has been doing a lot of useless things)
Have you ever played with pisskop before?
In post 584, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 569, 3dicerolling wrote:Although, nosferatu is definitely off the table for today.
whyyyyy
SRMP is probscum but Nos is obvscum
That's a great question for you. Why?
In post 223, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't know what to make of Almost50 defending his townread on Ranger
It's not at all a valid reason to townread someone but when reading his posts I get the sense that he genuinely believes in it.
I can't tell if that's because he knows she's town or because he's a newbie. I would like Ranger's thoughts if she has them.
Meanwhile,my scumvibes are back on SRMP, especially given how he's hedging immediately on his throwing shade on pisskop. I just don't feel like he's genuinely trying to solve the game. His accusations are always on the basis of people not posting or not being helpful, as opposed to doing something that legitimately appears scum-motivated.
And I also think voting a player who was replaced (160) is more likely to come from scum trying to find a comfortable spot to vote rather than a town player keeping tabs on players in the game. Although I'm a bit hesitant because I would expect cautious scum to catch that mistake before they post.
In post 589, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:In post 223, GuiltyLion wrote:I don't know what to make of Almost50 defending his townread on Ranger
It's not at all a valid reason to townread someone but when reading his posts I get the sense that he genuinely believes in it.
I can't tell if that's because he knows she's town or because he's a newbie. I would like Ranger's thoughts if she has them.
Meanwhile,my scumvibes are back on SRMP, especially given how he's hedging immediately on his throwing shade on pisskop. I just don't feel like he's genuinely trying to solve the game. His accusations are always on the basis of people not posting or not being helpful, as opposed to doing something that legitimately appears scum-motivated.
And I also think voting a player who was replaced (160) is more likely to come from scum trying to find a comfortable spot to vote rather than a town player keeping tabs on players in the game. Although I'm a bit hesitant because I would expect cautious scum to catch that mistake before they post.
how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)
In post 589, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)
In post 591, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 589, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:how were they back on if they always were there? If you have been scumreading me all game, the bolded implies that to have gotten back on me they had to be off. if they were always on me they couldent get back on (they = scumvibes)
they were gone for all of maybe 100 posts between 126 and 215
have you never doubted yourself on a scumread only to find yourself coming back to it when the player in question continues to look scummy?
I'm having a hard time believing you think this 'contradiction' means anything, or that you can't understand my thought process here.
In post 592, 3dicerolling wrote:Are you proposing he is mafia who knew that wasn't their kill, or sk that knew that wasn't their kill?
Or are you just proposing nos is non-town aligned in general.
In post 594, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 592, 3dicerolling wrote:Are you proposing he is mafia who knew that wasn't their kill, or sk that knew that wasn't their kill?
Or are you just proposing nos is non-town aligned in general.
I think he could be either, so non-town aligned in general. Again, Nos assuming that the kill was a maf kill I don't really have a problem with. But 480 is just so inconsistent with what he had posted, and what he continued to post afterwards, that it looks like flailing scum panic defense over a minor slip. Bulge said it more concisely in 516
My existing scumread on SRMP combined with the way SRMP went about pushing on this as well - particularly 477 - makes me think SRMP and Nos are scum on two opposite factions.
SRMP, does it matter at all if I say "all game" instead of "the majority of the game except for roughly 100 posts early on"? Like does that distinction mean anything alignment indicative?
In post 595, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:I dont know if it does, but I find it interesting you say something, then say something making the original statement incorrect literally 2 posts later.
In post 596, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 595, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:I dont know if it does, but I find it interesting you say something, then say something making the original statement incorrect literally 2 posts later.
okay whatever I'm fine with lynching SRMP if we aren't doing Nos today