In post 498, Nosferatu wrote:Because it's highly improbable it was an sk. The sk even has incentive to not kill because of the risk of there possibly being a tracker. Mafia has people to burn. There's an extremely small chance it was an sk.
I agree with this.
What I want to know is why weren't you saying this in 480?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
These are the people in the game (Excluding me ofc)
Ranger
Xtoxm
Some Random Mafia Player
Ankamius
The Bulge
davesaz
3dicerolling
pisskop
GuiltyLion
This is the same list excluding people I've either A, played with or B, I think have enough experience to not kill a suspected sk as an sk.
Some Random Mafia Player
The Bulge
3dicerolling
Now excluding the people I townread.
The Bulge
There is ONE player who I think could have possibly done this. ONE. And I don't think he's an sk.
So yeah, I'm pretty fucking confident an sk didn't make that kill.
pedit:
GuiltyLion wrote:
In post 498, Nosferatu wrote:Because it's highly improbable it was an sk. The sk even has incentive to not kill because of the risk of there possibly being a tracker. Mafia has people to burn. There's an extremely small chance it was an sk.
I agree with this.
What I want to know is why weren't you saying this in 480?
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
What don't you like about how I hopped onto him, exactly?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
The more I read it the more I don't see how you can reconcile the contradictions between 474 and 480 as coming from a town mindset.
Nosferatu implied that the kill was a mafia kill, then argued that he didn't literally say this and it could have been either scum faction, then doubled down again that it was a mafia kill.
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 464, Nosferatu wrote:Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao
I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...
50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean
killing the sk.
Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...
This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .
davesaz wrote:I
was
interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.
And this implied he meant that when he asked the first question.
fucking lol
flailing way too hard and trying to justify a slip. dave is 100% right here, and I think nos is caught scum. his last *however many* posts all about semantics and wording bullshit reeks of over-cautious scum trying to cover up a tiny slip. VOTE: nosferatu
In post 464, Nosferatu wrote:Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao
I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...
50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean
killing the sk.
Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...
This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .
davesaz wrote:I
was
interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.
And this implied he meant that when he asked the first question.
fucking lol
flailing way too hard and trying to justify a slip. dave is 100% right here, and I think nos is caught scum. his last *however many* posts all about semantics and wording bullshit reeks of over-cautious scum trying to cover up a tiny slip. VOTE: nosferatu
p sure this whole convo implies I'm sk. I don't think you're reading fam.
In post 515, GuiltyLion wrote:The more I read it the more I don't see how you can reconcile the contradictions between 474 and 480 as coming from a town mindset.
Nosferatu implied that the kill was a mafia kill, then argued that he didn't literally say this and it could have been either scum faction, then doubled down again that it was a mafia kill.
Or I made an unconscious assumption, tried to argue I didn't make an assumption, and then realized I did.
except it obviously wasn't an unconscious assumption in 474, it was the key point of your entire statement. You thought mafia was SK hunting with that kill. Then you tried to pretend like you weren't thinking that, because ???
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"