I'm always inclined to favour lynch over no lynch, though I think that we really need to significantly increase the amount of discussion going on so that we at least make as sensible a decision as possible.Oman wrote: It might be a little early to start asking this but re:deadline..
Semi-baseless Lynch or No lynch
pwayne, I'm still willing to answer any questions that you have that haven't been answered. I said this before, but it probably got lost in the jumble of arguments that have been flying back and forth. Just letting you know.
This is why I shouldn't post in th mornings... I did ask the questions again. I imagine they got lost as I had a meltdown immediatly after... I'll find them and repost.MoS, I can't find the question. I remember being asked about what questions you hadn't answered, but I answered that. Could you ask again?
(I know, a direct question or statement would have worked better)It seems that:
1) MoS posts defending FlameAxe and Theo
2) Oman calls him out for it
3) MoS and Vollkan beat the hell out of him over semantical issues.
4) Lost in the dust is any answers from MoS on how he reconciles Flameaxes' actions against the Doc. Lost is his answers about how posting content clears Theo.
5) MoS doesn't bother reading other's viewpoints as they might influence him
6) This is AOK with Volkan.
Am I missing something?
This was never answered either.As an IC, do you think the town ought to take to accepting "x feels protown" , "I think x is geniune" and "scum wouldn't do x" as reasonable statements that should be accepted without question?
No. I could make a long-winded answer about specific cases and stuff, but let's just talk generally. The answer is no.pwayne66 wrote:The first question was the disputed Oman question about your "Flame axe and theo seem protown" statements. You say that you answered this question and I have no desire to rehash this really.
This was my original point of contention with you. It seemed to me that your counter attack on Oman was a deliberate attempt to avoid answering the question. I wasn't so concerned with the question itself, only the subsequent reactions.
I posted this(243) in an effort to highlight that your answer and actions seemed evasive:
(I know, a direct question or statement would have worked better)It seems that:
1) MoS posts defending FlameAxe and Theo
2) Oman calls him out for it
3) MoS and Vollkan beat the hell out of him over semantical issues.
4) Lost in the dust is any answers from MoS on how he reconciles Flameaxes' actions against the Doc. Lost is his answers about how posting content clears Theo.
5) MoS doesn't bother reading other's viewpoints as they might influence him
6) This is AOK with Volkan.
Am I missing something?
In the end, your responce to the accusations that you didn't answer the question was that you did, but Oman didn't like the answer. I looked and I couldn't find an answer that satisfied me either. So..
In post 251, I posted this:
As an IC, do you think the town ought to take to accepting "x feels protown" , "I think x is geniune" and "scum wouldn't do x" as reasonable statements that should be accepted without question?
A little of both. First, I was trying to stir up the game with a little obstinance, but that got out of control. Mainly, though, I wanted to put some pressure on Oman, who had been pretty much clear of pressure at that point, from what I remember. Basically, I wanted to make sure that he could back up his statements with actual reasoning. He made conjectures towards me being scum with Flameaxe and Theo, so I wanted to see how deeply he felt this was a possibility. It's all fine and well if he thinks it's possible, cuz anything is possible as far as I'm concerned, other than me being scum, of course. But that's because I know my role. Anyway, that's all good, but I wanted to see how far he would commit, so that I could hold him to it later. He didn't want to commit very deeply at all, and he bucked at the pressure I put on him. That was just another note to add to the pile, so I think it was a productive endevour. It's not like I expect the scum to always say the obviously wrong things, you know. Oman questioning me on my statements was correct, but no one else called me on it, either. My statements weren't that big a deal. I wanted to see if Oman was just pointing out small things to get brownie points for being an attentive townie. It's all part of getting reactions from people.This was never answered either.
I think that everything following this exchange has been me believing that you are increasingly fiendish.
Also I, believed that your actions against Oman were unjust and evasive and your subsequent behavior indicated that you thought you were above what I took as common scrutiny.
I am coming to believe that this may just be the result of conflicting play styles and misunderstandings.
then why ask us if we lynch or no lynch? (if you always go for a lynch?)Oman wrote:yeah, I always go for lynch (the game is based around odd/even cycles so nolynch only helps on doc protect).
Where is Doctor BS?
Welcome Kakeng, you post anything it will be an improvement.Guardian wrote:Kakeng replaces ac1983fan (who requested replacement). Welcome him!
Dr. Blackstrike has been prodded and has failed to pick up his prod, I will begin searching for a replacement for him shortly...
Because I wanted the rest of the town's perspective (which I still haven't got). I do not personally control voting, so I can't really swing it one way or the other myself alone.CKD wrote:then why ask us if we lynch or no lynch? (if you always go for a lynch?)
my two cents, a lynch is almost always better than a no lynch...especially while there is a chance we can hit the cult leader Day 1 before they increase their numbersOman wrote:Because I wanted the rest of the town's perspective (which I still haven't got). I do not personally control voting, so I can't really swing it one way or the other myself alone.CKD wrote:then why ask us if we lynch or no lynch? (if you always go for a lynch?)
For what it's worth, I would like an extension also.Mos wrote: An extension to next Friday would be nice. I think we're getting pretty good activity now, but it's really dumb to have a lynch rushed when we're finally getting back on track with out discussion instead of just talking about me all the time.
Yeah, if it has any bearing put me down.vollkan wrote:For what it's worth, I would like an extension also.Mos wrote: An extension to next Friday would be nice. I think we're getting pretty good activity now, but it's really dumb to have a lynch rushed when we're finally getting back on track with out discussion instead of just talking about me all the time.