⭐ Blitz 20 — How To Be Normal [Game Over]

[davesaz]

I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

[davesaz]

EBWOP mafia kill.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

EBWOP mafia kill.

It is indeed odd, why would he complete disregard the possibility of it being a sk kill?

[Ranger]

I'm pretty sure I vote Some Random Mafia Player, though there's something I want to look into first.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

I'm pretty sure I vote Some Random Mafia Player, though there's something I want to look into first.

why not place your vote and then take it off if you decide otherwise?

[Nosferatu]

I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

EBWOP mafia kill.

I don't recall saying the kill was by mafia? I said scum?

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I don't think this specifies who performed a kill other than anti-town vs town?

Also you didn't ask that.

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

This says nothing about me specifying who made what kill.

[pisskop]

vote: dave

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

[Nosferatu]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

I

was

interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

And this implied he meant that when he asked the first question.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

I

was

interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

And this implied he meant that when he asked the first question.

if he meant that, and you knew that, then why did you say "I never did it" when you know you did (if you dident know you did that, then how did you know what he meant?)

[Nosferatu]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

Also, what's the point of commenting on this assumption? Why would sk kill the suspected sk?

What conclusion can you make from this observation that I made an assumption that mafia killed Karnage when it's far likely that it was? I mean you're right, looking at that second post it's pretty reasonable to say I did make that assumption (which admittedly, I was not initially aware of), but I don't see what you're getting out of it.

pedit: I thought he was talking about the first post and I didn't.

[Nosferatu]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

I

was

interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

And this implied he meant that when he asked the first question.

if he meant that, and you knew that, then why did you say "I never did it" when you know you did (if you dident know you did that, then how did you know what he meant?)

and you're skewing this really hard.

1. I didn't say "I never did it"
2. I never said nor implied I knew what he was talking about, hence the fucking question marks everywhere.
3. "if you dident know you did that, then how did you know what he meant?" <-- I don't even know what the fuck this means lol

"Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao" <-- I didn't see the assumption I made here
"I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill."
means he was interested in why I am certain Karnage is the kill when he asked
"I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to."
and the assumption isn't apparent until I respond to this ^ with
"50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean killing the sk."

So yeah I don't understand why you're skewing this here. If he said "I

am

interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill." then this would be a different story.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

Also, what's the point of commenting on this assumption? Why would sk kill the suspected sk?

What conclusion can you make from this observation that I made an assumption that mafia killed Karnage when it's far likely that it was? I mean you're right, looking at that second post it's pretty reasonable to say I did make that assumption (which admittedly, I was not initially aware of), but I don't see what you're getting out of it.

pedit: I thought he was talking about the first post and I didn't.

because your assuming its a guarantee, but you don't know for sure.

[davesaz]

I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

EBWOP mafia kill.

I don't recall saying the kill was by mafia? I said scum?

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I don't think this specifies who performed a kill other than anti-town vs town?

Also you didn't ask that.

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

This says nothing about me specifying who made what kill.

Umm, did I miss something? I thought there was only one death.
A town death is bad for town no matter who killed him.
It would actually be better for town if 50 had been right.
It would be even better for town if scum (or sk) had been lynched.

So what the heck is with the gloating?
And why so nervous all of a sudden when I (perhaps incorrectly) interpreted it as you knowing who made the kill?

I think I touched a nerve here, though it was merely a "what happened while I was gone" kind of question.

[davesaz]

vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

[3dicerolling]

vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

Are you saying that he's not town because of this vote?

[Nosferatu]

you confuse me dave

[Some Random Mafia Player]

vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

This seems to imply you townread him, but now scumread him for voting you. The post itself shows you townread him, but then the "aww" imo makes it look like you dont get to townread him because he voted you ;/

VOTE: Nosferatu

Nosferatu, there was 1 death, how do you know the mafia killed and the SK dident?

[davesaz]

Nah, it's disappointment that he (as likely town) would vote me (as town).

[Nosferatu]

vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

This seems to imply you townread him, but now scumread him for voting you. The post itself shows you townread him, but then the "aww" imo makes it look like you dont get to townread him because he voted you ;/

VOTE: Nosferatu

Nosferatu, there was 1 death, how do you know the mafia killed and the SK dident?

L M A O

can you not read? why would the sk kill the suspected sk???

sit down lol

[Some Random Mafia Player]

vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

This seems to imply you townread him, but now scumread him for voting you. The post itself shows you townread him, but then the "aww" imo makes it look like you dont get to townread him because he voted you ;/

VOTE: Nosferatu

Nosferatu, there was 1 death, how do you know the mafia killed and the SK dident?

L M A O

can you not read? why would the sk kill the suspected sk???

sit down lol

your acting as if its 100% fact, but it is indeed possible the sk did that.

I already said the above the first time you said that...

[GuiltyLion]

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Nosferatu

I don't like how he tried to play off like he wasn't assuming mafia made the kill in 480. This is inconsistent with a thought process coming from town who had assumed that mafia made the kill.

Nosferatu has since made it clear that he did believe (and still believes) it was a mafia kill, but when defending himself in 480 he tried to downplay this belief first. It reads like scum trying to deflect accusations rather than town trying to defend their belief.

[Some Random Mafia Player]

Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao

I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to. It was a very quick skim though...

50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean

killing the sk.

Interesting how you asked for clarification on a comment denouncing scum though...

This implies you thought the mafia made the kill intending to kill the sk, unless your implying the sk could have killed himself .

I

was

interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill.

And this implied he meant that when he asked the first question.

if he meant that, and you knew that, then why did you say "I never did it" when you know you did (if you dident know you did that, then how did you know what he meant?)

and you're skewing this really hard.

1. I didn't say "I never did it"
2. I never said nor implied I knew what he was talking about, hence the fucking question marks everywhere.
3. "if you dident know you did that, then how did you know what he meant?" <-- I don't even know what the fuck this means lol

"Nice to know scum actually believed 50s bullshit lmao" <-- I didn't see the assumption I made here
"I was interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill."
means he was interested in why I am certain Karnage is the kill when he asked
"I skimmed the stuff that happened while I was gone. An interpretation of what you mean by this might help, as I didn't catch whatever it was you're referring to."
and the assumption isn't apparent until I respond to this ^ with
"50 had a really stupid case that was a bunch of hasty associations and tunnels thrown together. Karnage was the supposed sk in this, and someone in the scum team was stupid enough to actually go off of that and think killing Karnage might mean killing the sk."

So yeah I don't understand why you're skewing this here. If he said "I

am

interested in why you're certain Karnage was the scum kill." then this would be a different story.

vote: dave

Aww, and just when events (in particular lack of 2nd kill) have me believing that you're probably town.

This seems to imply you townread him, but now scumread him for voting you. The post itself shows you townread him, but then the "aww" imo makes it look like you dont get to townread him because he voted you ;/

VOTE: Nosferatu

Nosferatu, there was 1 death, how do you know the mafia killed and the SK dident?

L M A O

can you not read? why would the sk kill the suspected sk???

sit down lol

your acting as if its 100% fact, but it is indeed possible the sk did that.

I already said the above the first time you said that...

to clarify, your right, why would the sk do that?

but as I pointed out, your acting as if you know for a 100% fact the mafia did the kill, instead of a stupid sk

so how do you know it isent a stupid sk?

[Nosferatu]

Because it's highly improbable it was an sk. The sk even has incentive to not kill because of the risk of there possibly being a tracker. Mafia has people to burn. There's an extremely small chance it was an sk.

[pisskop]

I cant believe you guys are having a discussion about an sk in a mini with 1 nk