Blitz 22: Flash Blitz. GAME OVER

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #150 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:32 am

1) how do you know that TItus is a cop.
2) why do you believe it?

Jeanne11 · Post Post #151 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:34 am

1. I don't know
2. Ask the party in question.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #152 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:34 am

3. How do you know she's scum? Or are you just biased against her?

Jeanne11 · Post Post #153 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:35 am

Also, there must be some reasonable doubt, even with you.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #154 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:36 am

Because she's blatantly misrepping things that are going on that Town!Titus would absolutely understand in order to try to avoid pressure and get the wagon pushed outside of the pair of us.

She is scum.

Also, there must be some reasonable doubt, even with you.

No, not any doubt after that 'why didn't you vote me!!!' line.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #155 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:38 am

Well, considering you wanted to oust both the cop and a doctor once, I don't believe you. You're not always right.

mykonian · Post Post #156 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:39 am

votecount

Masquerade (4): 3dicerolling, Xtoxm, Titus, Jeanne11
Titus (2): Frozen Angel, RadiantCowbells
xtoxm (1): Almost50

not voting (4): Ranger, Masquerade, rkvothe, firebringer

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #157 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:39 am

I'm not always right.

There's a massive difference in the scenarios here. Titus is blatantly misrepresenting my actions as scummy when she should fully understand them coming from a town mindset.

There's no town reason for such a thing, and if there is one she should be wagoned and forced to share it.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #158 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:44 am

Well, how do we know you're not scum, though? I've been told multiple times that your word isn't enough.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #159 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:46 am

Then wagon me instead?

Shnikeys it isn't difficult.

I am saying that I am 100% certain that Titus is scum.

Either I am scum or she is scum or both.

We are voting in the pair of us today.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #160 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:47 am

Why are you so insistent though? What if you're both town?

Jeanne11 · Post Post #161 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:49 am

Also, the fact that last time someone was trying to lynch another that earnestly they ended up being scum doesn't help you

VOTE: RC

And now you're gonna yell at me that I am wrong etc etc etc

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #162 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:50 am

We're not both town.

I'm fine with this conditional on Titus's lynch following my own.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #163 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:52 am

Again, why so certain that you're not?

Jeanne11 · Post Post #164 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:53 am

And you're phrasing your words as if your word is law

Jeanne11 · Post Post #165 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:55 am

Also, I am a little miffed for reasons known only to FA, Titus and myself, so....>.>

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #166 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:55 am

Titus could have PMed me her role pm admitting that she was scum and it wouldn't make me any more certain than she already has.

Also, I am a little miffed for reasons known only to FA, Titus and myself, so....>.>

Miffed with me?

That's fine.

I'm trying to lynch scum. You can stand in my way or you can stand with me, the important thing is that you don't ignore me.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #167 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:57 am

And the fact you wouldn't even answer my question is further proof.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #168 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:58 am

I have answered your question five fucking times.

I will not be answering it again.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #169 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:59 am

And yes, you're one of the people I'm miffed with.

Fine. >.>

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #170 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:59 am

In post 121, RadiantCowbells wrote:Actually, I'm comfortable sharing one.
You are trying to break down communication between us.
This was a common denominator in 558 and 1750 and was a strong part of your play in 1750.

I'm not trying to autolynch you, I'm not pushing for a bandwagon. I'm trying to get you to communicate a language that I speak.
Don't act like I'm picking a fight, I'm perfectly open to jumping off if you respond in a towny way, but that's not what's happening here.

In post 134, RadiantCowbells wrote:Oh, and I did vote you.

YOU KNOW FULL WELL WHY I UNVOTED YOU SO DON'T EVEN PRETEND THAT YOU DON'T.

In post 148, RadiantCowbells wrote:Titus is being blatantly dishonest in her use of meta WRT me.
She's blatantly misrepping my points and stance on her.
She KNOWS that I would want to avoid pushing her because of our history. For her to go out and say OH BUT WHY DIDNT YOU VOTE ME is boldly ignoring our history in a way that is a scumclaim to anyone who understands it.

WE ARE NOT LYNCHING OUTSIDE OF THE PAIR OF US TODAY. PERIOD>

In post 154, RadiantCowbells wrote:Because she's blatantly misrepping things that are going on that Town!Titus would absolutely understand in order to try to avoid pressure and get the wagon pushed outside of the pair of us.

She is scum.

Also, there must be some reasonable doubt, even with you.

No, not any doubt after that 'why didn't you vote me!!!' line.

In post 157, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm not always right.

There's a massive difference in the scenarios here. Titus is blatantly misrepresenting my actions as scummy when she should fully understand them coming from a town mindset.

There's no town reason for such a thing, and if there is one she should be wagoned and forced to share it.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #171 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:00 am

All you've been doing is making excuses. I want a direct answer.

p-edit: That's conditional evidence that relies on you being town, which I am not certain you are.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #172 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:01 am

Then lynch one of the pair of us.

Titus will be confirmed scum either way.

Jeanne11 · Post Post #173 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:02 am

Seriously, people yell at me all the time for using such conditional evidence. Yes, you are one of them. So what gives you the right to use it and get away with it?

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #174 (ISO) » Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:03 am

I have literally never once yelled at you for using conditional evidence.

Hell, I don't think we've ever been town in a game together besides 557 where I was refusing to engage you because you were harassing me on christmas.