Xtoxm I'd prefer a Ranger lynch over your lynch for sure. But it makes me uncomfortable how Almost is townreading her and SRMP is scumreading her and I'd really like to work that out first today to some degree if I can
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
@xtomx - I reading ranger as town. Nothing I'm seeing is all that different from town ranger, and she's been playing similar to me this game.
If it comes down to needing you for a lynch, then I will do it, but at this point, I would rather not lynch you today. I get somewhat of where pisskop is coming from, but I'm also getting townvibes from your posts. I also incorrectly read you last time we played together, so I'm trying to keep all this into account.
That being said, I would much prefer and almost50 lynch.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
The great thing about blitzs is that we dont have to wait 2 weeks for people to get off their bums and vote.
beeboy - Everyone thought this game was made to troll pie but it was really made to troll pisskop. Almost50 pisskop: Overall, that's a townie slot. Don't ask for specifics because with PK everything can be interpreted either way. It's probably WHEN he says/does things that matter, so it's more of a matter of conception rather than solid reasoning.
GuiltyLion i'm initially liking for town due to 40 and this comment:
In post 126, GuiltyLion wrote:Xtoxm wagon is better but I also feel like Xtoxm would have stronger scumplay than this
doubt I formatted it correctly, but you can find this in his first big post if you doubt me
Xtoxm, why do those 2 things consitute to lion being town? You townread me, while in that post he scumreads me, and in the quote all he does is not scumread you. Do those 2 things make him town?
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Adding on to this, based on my knowledge ranger never explained their vote either, they just said "based on interactions, (something I dont remember off the top of my head), and (something else I dont remember)" but not specifying how the actions were scummy.
In post 297, Xtoxm wrote:I don't have much of a read at all there, but I guess I have to bank on it being scum to have any chance of not being lynched.
Let me get this one straight: Your most upper priority is to evade the lynch rather than find real scum? Because the way you phrase it give me the impression you're just looking for a scapegoat to get lynched in your stead.
Honestly; I do not mind lynching droog either (but to a lesser degree than 3dr), but the way you phrase it makes me wonder how on earth I'm supposed to trust you for the rest of the game if you're #1 concern is self-preservation and not the town's best interest.
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Why are you choosing to defend me rather than attack his play? Or why are you not choosing to defend others as well?
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Why are you choosing to defend me rather than attack his play? Or why are you not choosing to defend others as well?
This kind of pings WKing.
Im not defending you, im pointing out that a townread of theirs made the same mistake you did.
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Why are you choosing to defend me rather than attack his play? Or why are you not choosing to defend others as well?
This kind of pings WKing.
Im not defending you, im pointing out that a townread of theirs made the same mistake you did.
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Why are you choosing to defend me rather than attack his play? Or why are you not choosing to defend others as well?
This kind of pings WKing.
Im not defending you, im pointing out that a townread of theirs made the same mistake you did.
I see no resemblance of comparison in that post.
its not a defense on you, its an attack on ranger. Almost's point is valid, but they cant say that and ignore the fact that their townread did the same thing.
In post 97, davesaz wrote:Are day SK normal?
What about a straight day vig who thought he was scum fakeclaiming PGO to explain not getting NK'd?
In retrospect the PGO claim was probably an attempt to get wagoned, then the IC can be revealed and scumhunt off the resulting chaos. But we won't know till postgame.
This looks like he is testing the waters for a day-vig claim
In post 309, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Did he? Because all I saw is him defending himself against my accusation of him over-reacting to a joke post. He never did mention a valid reason that he would vote me "other than that".
In post 296, GuiltyLion wrote:I guess actually the best question for you Almost is why on earth do you think 3dr is scum
Because his reaction to my joke-post was most unnatural and extremely exaggerated. He then denied his vote on me was bc of it, but when asked to give an alternative reason he declined. It's one thing to post reads w/o reasoning, and totally another thing to cast a vote for no reason even when you get asked for one by your vote target.
All in all he didn't act in anyway I would consider natural, and the only reason I'm not pushing too hard on him is bc I don't think we will get him lynched today based on the fact not many others share my view, so I'm better off voting on someone we all agree on, in which case I need to be persuaded.
just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Why are you choosing to defend me rather than attack his play? Or why are you not choosing to defend others as well?
This kind of pings WKing.
Im not defending you, im pointing out that a townread of theirs made the same mistake you did.
I see no resemblance of comparison in that post.
its not a defense on you, its an attack on ranger. Almost's point is valid, but they cant say that and ignore the fact that their townread did the same thing.
Theres something I meant to put here I never did that i thought I did, ranger also did somewhat the same thing by just saying "bad interactions and posting" without mentioning how, I see the confusion and thought I was answering what i just stated. To correct my response, yes, I did just defend you in that case because you did actually post reasoning. Im not saying it was good, just said it was.
In post 309, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:just so you know, he did end up posting reasoning to lynching you that you even responded to, so I see no reason for you to say he gave none when you know he did.
Did he? Because all I saw is him defending himself against my accusation of him over-reacting to a joke post. He never did mention a valid reason that he would vote me "other than that".
I thought his reasoning was 107, if it wasent correct me, but im rather sure about it.
In post 297, Xtoxm wrote:I don't have much of a read at all there, but I guess I have to bank on it being scum to have any chance of not being lynched.
Let me get this one straight: Your most upper priority is to evade the lynch rather than find real scum? Because the way you phrase it give me the impression you're just looking for a scapegoat to get lynched in your stead.
Honestly; I do not mind lynching droog either (but to a lesser degree than 3dr), but the way you phrase it makes me wonder how on earth I'm supposed to trust you for the rest of the game if you're #1 concern is self-preservation and not the town's best interest.
im pretty sure when he called lion town he basically said that he was worrying about survival. The quote he put makes me think such at least.
