In post 273, GuiltyLion wrote:I agree she's not helping town
I disagree that not helping town is a strong indicator of scum
whats stopping you from falling on my bandwagon of xtox?
In post 273, GuiltyLion wrote:I agree she's not helping town
I disagree that not helping town is a strong indicator of scum
In post 227, Marquis wrote:DAY 1. VOTECOUNT 08.
»(1)Ranger— Some Random Mafia Player
»(3)Xtoxm— Spiffeh, pisskop, droog
»(1)Some Random Mafia Player— GuiltyLion
(0)droog—
(0)The Bulge—
»(3)Nosferatu— The Bulge, Xtoxm, Almost50
»(2)Almost50— 3dicerolling, Nosferatu
(0)davesaz—
(0)3dicerolling—
(0)pisskop—
»(1)GuiltyLion— Ranger
»(1)Spiffeh— davesaz
(0)NOT VOTING—
With12 alive, it takes7 votesto lynch.
Deadline is in(expired on 2016-01-24 13:00:00)(Sun Jan 24 @ 1:30:00 PM EST).
In post 280, pisskop wrote:meh. I feel like he would know how to fake scumhubnting and I wonder if it isnt a show but I have nothing on him rn
In post 266, GuiltyLion wrote:It's funny because I'm town
if Ranger is town I can't wait to see her reaction post game.
In post 281, GuiltyLion wrote:SRMP - because townies are often stubborn, lazy, or emotionally compromised. also there are more of them so by sheer probability if a certain number of players are not helping town then it's more likely a town behavior than not.
Do you think scum would want to look like they're not helping town? Because that's a big reason why I'm scumreading you, your posts look like they're trying too hard to look town.
pisskop - there's nothing explicitly stopping me from being on it but I think Almost50/SRMP would make better wagons. Also I agreed largely with Xtoxm's reads when he gave them
In post 284, GuiltyLion wrote:
While we're talking about Almost, this is another thing that pings.
Almost is not interested in finding his own reasons to vote someone, he'd rather be convinced to jump on a wagon.
Seems like a safe way of making a vote on a wagon without getting your hands dirty.
In post 289, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
but in all seriousness, I have been working this hard to find scum all game, if you have a problem with it why not scumread me for it earlier?
In post 293, GuiltyLion wrote:In post 289, Some Random Mafia Player wrote:
but in all seriousness, I have been working this hard to find scum all game, if you have a problem with it why not scumread me for it earlier?
What kind of question is this? I've been on you all game.
In post 291, Almost50 wrote:
I get the feeling you're not reading my posts as a whole, but -instead- are taking picked excerpts. I did state whom I would be comfortable voting for on my own. The town isn't interested though, so we need to come to agree on someone who doesn't strike me as extremely scummy. If that's the case; someone needs to show me wh○7t I've been missing. WHY is Xtoxm an appropriate lynch target? What have they said/done that is so hideous? What do we learn from their flip? It's either-or. Either I vote for X whom I personally think is acting scummy, OR get convinced that lynching Y is beneficial for the town as their flip will clear the view on A, B & C.
In post 282, 3dicerolling wrote:In post 280, pisskop wrote:meh. I feel like he would know how to fake scumhubnting and I wonder if it isnt a show but I have nothing on him rn
Hm okay. I'll sheep you on xtomx if he keeps playing like this, but I got town vibes from his big post.
In post 298, GuiltyLion wrote:
Because there are other players in the game
Are you trying to imply I can't be scumreading someone I'm not voting? What's your current read on me?