In post 3141, Lowkey wrote:In post 3133, Drunken Pirates wrote:You want Max, tell us why beyond he feels funny.
Max has been posting without actually feeling like he's got his own slot in this game. He hasn't made any eye-opening cases or said anything that was committed to a certain point of view andheld that point of viewas if he believes it. He's just been posting these walls with a ton of words and not a lot to show for it to the point that I'm pretty sure a lot of it is just put there to make it look as if he wants me to believe he has something to say. It all makes sense logically and what have you but at the end of the day scum can appear pretty logical in posting, even me. He's been reacting a lot to what's happening as it's happening and not in a way that makes me think he's town. Just hours before he went off on DGB scum, he posted the below.
DGB isn't as bad as I thought. Her posts don't really make me feel one way or the other, I think they just didn't make an impression and I forgot about the ones where she was actually doing stuff. Null on that, not coasting scum like I thought it might be.
This is not someone who's going to turn against DGB; this is someone who can't read DGB and has zero opinion of her posting.
*Directly after DGB's reads list with lurkers/lepers he says the below*
Implying he either thinks zz is scum or isn't credible.Max wrote:I can't believe you've put me in with the players who haven't posted yet, and ZZZX. I think I'm actually crying.
I also had another post about Max earlier.
Let's take these one at a time.
1) Hasn't made any eye opening cases:
How many players do that? This is an unreasonable standard, and I doubt all of your townreads are players who have impressed you.
2) Has not committed to a certain point of view, and held it, as if they believe it: This is also not a town or scum tell. My views change as I get new information, a stagnating player is one who isn't reading the game. And, this point is also untrue.. I'm pretty committed to ABR scum, because he's playing town like a fiddle.
3) The empty walls: Again with the walls. This is null, I always do this. I'm wordy and it's not ideal but it's hard to change. Do you honestly think I type all this shit for padding, especially after being told in SU mafia postgame that it made my ISO annoying to read?
About DGB... you said it yourself. Her posting made no impression on me and I can't read her right now. The solution is to read her later when we have flips.
Also, here's a reference of me 'going off on DGB scum'/
In post 3003, MaxwellPuckett wrote:In post 2993, DrippingGoofball wrote:In post 2992, Drunken Pirates wrote:Even if you think each other are scum, engaging scum on their reads can tell you the beats scum want to push.
I don't discuss with scum.
This is objectively bad. ZZZX'S vote was justified imo.
Titus: even with that meta, this just sounds like DGB is flat out refusing to engagr with ZZZX. That's just avoiding information.
Also my post where I mentioned I had DGB as a recent scumlean.
And:
In post 3031, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I'm not townreading ZZZX, as I said earlier. I just didn't like DGB's recent posts. ZZZX was making a lot of posts that were half jokes, and yeah they weren't great, but whatever, that's not what I was focusing on. Look at the original context for DGB's statement.
Titu says 'engaging scum can be useful for reasons', and DGB responds with 'I don't engage with scum'. Like.. what do you have to lose?
Oh and finally
In post 3039, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Yosarian: I see what you're saying. I don't know if ZZZX's play came off as that calculated, though.
But, I guess I was wrong with my earlier judgement, there was a lot of stuff I wasn't considering when I said that, its not objectively bad.
Lowkey, you're 'coming around on me being scum'. Explain how this exchange made you say that.
Pedit: Hey, look guys, remember when I said ABR might not actually want Klingon lynched? Look! I told the future.
Like.. seriously, your case just boils down to 'I feel funny' to you, even with your explanation. The things you say are vague.
Also, I don't even know what you're trying to prove with that quote where I responded to the readslist. Like, besides it being a lighthearted joke, I don't even know what point your making. Also, I wasn't ZZZX scum or not credible there... it was just a light dig. That, and I couldn't just say 'players who hadn't posted yet'... that would be wrong, ZZZX had posted plenty by then.
This post is just saying Max doesn't make Lowkey feel good. Thassit. I'm getting annoyed that this stuff keeps being repeated with no concrete..