Mini 506: The Siena Syndicate - Game Over!

[White]

Nice OMGUS there Mr. Original. (btw, that's an unoriginal name, unoriginal tactic (OMGUS) and unoriginal tagline (the day is now).

[ChronX]

Lets throw around a little pressure

unvote
VOTE originality

[White]

*laugh*

I like this, this'll be fun. I'll not unvote. Originalityscum! Obvobv. Tell us who your partners are and we'll let you live tonight.

[Peers]

Now -this- is entertainment! Now, do I change my vote or not... or see where the bandwagon is going first?

[White]

Your choice man. But jumping off the bandwagon before the pressure has been felt ruins the point of it.

[originality]

Oh god oh god oh god the pressure OK OK I give up I confess. I'm a goon. Lynch me now and get this over with

[ChronX]

I have finally figured this game out :):):)

[Cynic Clinic]

I don't like putting in comical things or even saying that it is a random vote. The purpose of the random vote in the first place is to get someone to react in a scummy way. The random vote says 'i could KNOW that you are scum' if you are. If you aren't scum, then you have nothing to worry about.

[Cynic Clinic]

EDBWOP: Wow, didn't even look at the second page. Disregard all of that.

originality really isn't playing this game right.

[ChronX]

unvote
vote Cynic Clinic

(for missing the GMs rule that we are here to have fun)

[originality]

I'll be gone for most of the weekend. I don't think it matters now that we are in the beginning of things but there you go.

[Cynic Clinic]

I am having fun. Being smart in a cynic/cool way is fun for me. But for real, he's sarcastically claimed twice. Once as scum! That's not good play. I'm not going to be sour about it, though. I can go on normally.

There's 12 in this game, right? Then I should've done this earlier.

unvote

and

vote: originality

[Avinyl]

FoS: ChronX

for voting without any reason even when things are starting to happen (Post 34).

FoS: Green Day

for reasons stated in post 19.

FoS: Originality

for jokeclaiming twice; also, both of his votes has been on those who voted him (Posts 14, 24, 30).

FoS: White

for not noticing that Peeers wasn't on the Originality wagon (Post 29).
I would vote Originality, as he seems scummier than Green Day, but I don't know how many votes he has, and I don't want to put him too close to a lynch.

I don't like putting in comical things or even saying that it is a random vote. The purpose of the random vote in the first place is to get someone to react in a scummy way. The random vote says 'i could KNOW that you are scum' if you are. If you aren't scum, then you have nothing to worry about.

I agree with this.

[Xdaamno]

Votecount

Cynic Clinic: 3

(VampanezeHunter, Green Day, ChronX)

originality: 3

(tyhess, White, Cynic Clinic)

White: 2

(ChannelDelibird, originality)

Green Day: 2

(Hadhfang, Avinyl)

VampanezeHunter: 1

(Peers)

Avinyl: 1

(clockwork)

Not Voting: 0

Player List: Hadhfang, originality, clockwork, ChannelDelibird, Cynic Clinic, Avinyl, tyhess, VampanezeHunter, Peers, White, Green Day, ChronX.

Seven (7) to lynch.

[ChannelDelibird]

Cynic Clinic seems to have accrued four votes without much fanfare at all. I reckon there could be scum on this wagon.

I'll have a look back over the posts of those voting for him.

[Avinyl]

I am rather certain i am voting for Green Day, not Cynic Clinic.

Mod: Thanks for pointing that out, I must of missed it. Editing it in now.

[ChronX]

FoS: ChronX

for voting without any reason even when things are starting to happen (Post 34).

FoS: Green Day

for reasons stated in post 19.

FoS: Originality

for jokeclaiming twice; also, both of his votes has been on those who voted him (Posts 14, 24, 30).

FoS: White

for not noticing that Peeers wasn't on the Originality wagon (Post 29).
I would vote Originality, as he seems scummier than Green Day, but I don't know how many votes he has, and I don't want to put him too close to a lynch.

I don't like putting in comical things or even saying that it is a random vote. The purpose of the random vote in the first place is to get someone to react in a scummy way. The random vote says 'i could KNOW that you are scum' if you are. If you aren't scum, then you have nothing to worry about.

I agree with this.

OK, a couple of things. You FOS'd everybody who has done anything except show up and random vote, essentially. Do you really think all 4 people who are ramping up to moving out of the random stage are ALL scum? Have some conviction. You seem to just be throwing out suspicion to see what might stick.

Second, we haven't had a night. If CC's way of playing is to be studious and serious, that is fine, but I DON't agree with the idea that in this game, the random votes can possibly be anything but random. No cop investigation, no watcher or roleblocker info, and if there are "brothers" generally each would know of the other so a random vote wouldn't accomplish much in the way of someone saying they "could" know something. For avinyl to agree with CC on this seems odd. Buddying? If I have time I am going to meta avinyl a bit and see if he is always anti-joke.

For now I am going to cast my first real vote of the game.

unvote
VOTE Avinyl

[clockwork]

Unvote.

There's a lot of... "erratic" behavior going on here. I'm going to withdraw my vote and wait for people to sober up a bit.

[VampanezeHunter]

Cynic Clinic seems to have accrued four votes without much fanfare at all. I reckon there could be scum on this wagon.

I'll have a look back over the posts of those voting for him.

Meh only 3. Also mine was a random vote. But for now

Unvote: Clynic Clinic

I shall also go back and look through and see if there has been any scummy behaviour!

[Peers]

Unvote

Vote: Avinyl

Reason: He claims ChronX voted without a reason in post 34, when post 34 clearly states his reason for voting. He's either a) not paying attention to posts, which is dangerous for the town, or b) he's paying attention but trying to twist our perceptions, which can't possibly have a benign reason behind it.

[VampanezeHunter]

I just read through (didn't take long, lol) and didn't find too much scummy behaviour. There were a few point...

Oh god oh god oh god the pressure OK OK I give up I confess. I'm a goon. Lynch me now and get this over

I think this is meant to be a joke, but it

could

be scum having an attempt to clear his name. I doubt it greatly but I'm not counting anything out yet.

Reason: He claims ChronX voted without a reason in post 34, when post 34 clearly states his reason for voting. He's either a) not paying attention to posts, which is dangerous for the town, or b) he's paying attention but trying to twist our perceptions, which can't possibly have a benign reason behind it.

Hmmm....This interested me a bit. I agree with all of his points here, but it could be scum trying to get an early target to make their game a whole lot easier.

I'm looking at everything because I want to have a good game this game!

[Hadhfang]

Originality hasn't really helped discussion yet, as his jokeclaim can be read in various ways. Though we will have to wait for him to get back, I'm willing to wait that long to get a better reading on him.

unvote
Vote: Originality

[White]

Avinyl, the beginning parts of the game are seriously supposed to be fun and joking around. As time goes conversation gets more serious and people slip up. Getting upset and assuming people are scum because they're doing what they should be doing and helping us to move out of the random voting stage is overanxious. You've got a few votes on you currently so I won't vote you but IGMEOY.

[Avinyl]

OK, a couple of things. You FOS'd everybody who has done anything except show up and random vote, essentially. Do you really think all 4 people who are ramping up to moving out of the random stage are ALL scum? Have some conviction. You seem to just be throwing out suspicion to see what might stick.

I do not think that all of them are scum, but i think that some of them are more suspicious than the rest.

Second, we haven't had a night. If CC's way of playing is to be studious and serious, that is fine, but I DON't agree with the idea that in this game, the random votes can possibly be anything but random. No cop investigation, no watcher or roleblocker info, and if there are "brothers" generally each would know of the other so a random vote wouldn't accomplish much in the way of someone saying they "could" know something. For avinyl to agree with CC on this seems odd. Buddying? If I have time I am going to meta avinyl a bit and see if he is always anti-joke.

I don't like people to state that their votes are random. Someone could have a role that says that one person is scum, or they could have seen something suspicious they didn't want to disclose. I think it would be hard to meta me, seeing as i haven't played very much here.

Unvote
Vote: Avinyl

Reason: He claims ChronX voted without a reason in post 34, when post 34 clearly states his reason for voting. He's either a) not paying attention to posts, which is dangerous for the town, or b) he's paying attention but trying to twist our perceptions, which can't possibly have a benign reason behind it.

I guess that i should have said "voting for no

good

reason".

Avinyl, the beginning parts of the game are seriously supposed to be fun and joking around. As time goes conversation gets more serious and people slip up. Getting upset and assuming people are scum because they're doing what they should be doing and helping us to move out of the random voting stage is overanxious. You've got a few votes on you currently so I won't vote you but IGMEOY.

I am not upset. I am saying what i find supsicious. Also note that my FoSes do not mean that i am very suspicious, i believe that ChronX and White seem more town than scum.

[White]

I did notice something. In 37 you posted a FoS against everyone that voted Originality excluding CC who posted 2 hours before you. You couldn't have cross posted with him so...why exclude him?