Mini 1755: Game Over

[UpTooLate]

@UTL hey there. good to see you back.
Are you the same alignment as me this time?

Hello again! I hope so, I'd rather have you on my side than not.

[AxleGreaser]

I dont support the Pisskop wagon. It has no reasons, that I see.

correction.
oops sorry hadnt read 96, Ive been grappling with my Ircher read.
Still not voting pisskop at this time.

[pisskop]

To let yu guys tie your own knots and to follow my established meta.

[pisskop]

Im more than willing to lose to prove my point.

[pisskop]

When and if I feel like it Ill come back and do things.

[UpTooLate]

Im more than willing to lose to prove my point.

What exactly is your point?

[Raskolnikov]

WTF why are you guys lynching pisskop
UNVOTE:

[Raskolnikov]

So ... when you say someone is the scummiest, you might actually think they're town? Just the worst town?

Not neccessarily. Early game, yes, that's a possib)e way to interpret it. (as it was in this case)

I would jump on Pisskop's wagon for his very pooor conduct except he's at L-2 right now... Still, maybe we should policy lynch him?

You really should read my game in the sig.

Let's see.... Pisskop is not helping town at alll, is complaining a lot for no reason, self voted, and is overall making the game less fun or everyone else.

I think he would deserve a Policy Lynch, but as I stated, I'm not jumping on the wagon because there is a good chance I'm wrong and pisskop is just being stubborn.

Alarm bells went off in my head when I read these.

VOTE: Ircher

[AxleGreaser]

In your first post, why did you feel the need to say not serious?

VOTE: pisskop
Not serious.

I see your recent actual alarm bell vote.
Do you have anything else to add to the game?

[AlwaysInnocent]

I don't think town-Pisskop would give up like this. It is so weird.

[AlwaysInnocent]

WTF why are you guys lynching pisskop
UNVOTE:

I thought I had given reasons for my vote.

Why are you pretending you don't know?

[AxleGreaser]

@performer.

Spoiler: clarification

But asking about fake claiming?.....there's even a discussion created about that being a bad idea

There is a discussion about fake claiming being bad.
or
There is discussion about discussing it being bad? (if so where pls?)

[AlwaysInnocent]

Axle, it is clear that Performed meant this:

There is a discussion about fake claiming being bad.

What is there not to understand?

[AxleGreaser]

Axle, it is clear that Performed meant this:

There is a discussion about fake claiming being bad.

What is there not to understand?

I thought he meant the other and only just recently realized he was referring to Thors thread on the topic.
I don't see how it being well known that fake claiming is bad is relevant at all. If there was thread claiming that raising it as discussion point is bad, and alignment indicative then Id be interested.

Answering questions for other people is in general IMO bad. please dont.
And yeah that also applies to 26 and on.

[AlwaysInnocent]

Answering questions for other people is in general IMO bad. please dont.

The question is just weird (the answer is obvious). Almost like you are asking questions for the sake of asking questions again.

[AxleGreaser]

Answering questions for other people is in general IMO bad. please dont.

The question is just weird (the answer is obvious). Almost like you are asking questions for the sake of asking questions again.

Answering questions for other people is in general IMO bad. please dont.

Lets try it this way.
If you stick your size 12 boot in thing you wont get to see if they were actually going anywhere now will you....

[AxleGreaser]

Axle, it is clear that Performed meant this:

There is a discussion about fake claiming being bad.

What is there not to understand?

To be fair i suppose i did ask you to ask questions about things that dont make sense as that how you find out.
And i did not mention, that you ought wait until the interaction you dont understand is over before you ask.

So in 7 I asked question, a got an answer little unlike what i expected, and stated what I did and didn't find out in 9.
That would be time to ask about what had just happened, as it was seemingly over. If you were unsure if I was still perhaps going somewhere with that, you might wait and find out. Or sometimes, when its me questioning what someone did and why, I wait for quite some time, before checking, so I can then state with some surety it went no where.

sigh.

[Keyser Söze]

Still, maybe we should policy lynch him?

We won't be policy lynching anyone - replacing out is a better option.

The wagon on me is crap

Yes, your wagon was comprised of two RVS votes (Burning_Earth, Raskolnikov), AlwaysInnocent's scum-case and my sheep vote.

Your reaction to these votes was poor, the self-vote even poorer. If I am faced with a wagon I think has no weight/substance I address the points concisely then move on to scumhunting. You don't cry about it and call the game "dumb" - you should be pro-active.

Here has been your D1 behaviour so far:

AI, youre full of piss and vinegar today?

vote" AI

You keep not engaging. We'll see who wins

vote" AI

You keep not engaging. We'll see who wins

This game is dumb. AI is dumb. I have never seen such an overbearing attempt to get me to ???

All your early contributions are focused on yourself and the person attacking you. There are 11 other players in this game - where is your attempt to find out their alignment?

Here is your self-vote:

vote: pisskop

Like I dont even care about this game

, and the fapterbation and trying to force us out of lylo with overanalysis is something both keysor and ai do.

I scumread ai for sure. Take a look at his very small meta and tell me why

.

You still need to explain why you think

these

are scum-indicative.

terrible terribleness that is my wagon,

It is not the strongest of wagons as it contains two RVS votes, an early scum case and a sheep vote: but your reaction is very telling.

To let yu guys tie your own knots and to

follow my established meta

.

Don't use meta as a defence Meta can be manipulated - I learnt that in my newbie games.

Im more than willing to lose to prove my point.

This is both anti-town and scummy. I would suggest replacing out if you want to get lynched just to prove your personal point.

When and if I feel like it Ill come back and do things.

You can start by unvoting yourself and begin to share your thoughts of everyone.

[Keyser Söze]

I dont support the Pisskop wagon. It has no reasons, that I see.

If he's town, at least it's slapped him into action:

Ill come back and do things.

[AlwaysInnocent]

Pisskop is not a beginner. He knows how to play Mafia. I really don't understand why town-Pisskop would act like this. From town-Pisskop's POV, I could be scum trying to frame him. Surely he wouldn't give up so easily if he considered this possible?

In our last game together, he was town and wasn't very impressed by my actions. In fact, he even lynched me (I was town too), because he thought it was scummy. What causes him to react like this?

What seems most plausible is this: Scum-Pisskop hates being scumread on page 5 and attempts to confuse the town by doing something bold. Possibly he doesn't even like playing scum.

[AlwaysInnocent]

If Pisskop is scum, then one of the people defending him is probably scum, too.

So: Axle or Raskolnikov.

[Keyser Söze]

I guess what I want to know, PK, is what exactly is your intent with the selfvote?

To let yu guys tie your own knots and to

follow my established meta

.

Im more than willing to lose to

prove my point

.

I hope you're not alluding to a trust-tell. What is it: when you self-vote, call the game and players "dumb" you're town?

WTF why are you guys lynching pisskop
UNVOTE:

No one is lynching anyone (there were 5 votes). Again, a suspicious overreaction

+1

[AlwaysInnocent]

Yeah, Keyser is likely town.

[AlwaysInnocent]

Deus needs to post more.

[Dierfire]

Bump