In post 467, MaxwellPuckett wrote:
Is mollie talking to someone else? Is anyone in on this joke? I saw this and thought maybe you made up some bullshit game as a joke to demonstrate how we'd 'totally played before', but apparently the game is real so... I have to ask. Who are you talking to?
you obvsly. since you are the 1 I played the game with.
You. And. Lowkey. Brought up the miller and not miller claims, and agreed that both of them being this close to each other was weird. You said it was weird the miller claimed miller. That's what millers are supposed to do.
sequence of posts is a thing don't you think?
flum said "I am not a miller" and then r&l claimed miller. it was a weird occurrence early on d1. it raised my eyebrows. sort of like the movie the body snatchers type of thing.
It was just a small thing at the beginning but it's gaining traction for vague, silly reasons in a good number of cases, a lot of stuff I don't like is surrounding it, blah blah, it's so Day 1 wagon. Someone put out a nice scum case on Flum that makes this a better wagon than other players, and I might rethink it.
how about you put out a case on who YOU think is scum instead of waiting for other pple to convince you of their own.
And the only other time people criticized a vote on this wagon, it was for a vote that actually had clear reason. Am I in an alternate dimension? What the hell is going on here? After lunch I'm going to make a list of every Flum vote and unvote and talk about what I think of all of them, because these constant questions that keep simplifying how I feel about the wagon are making me tired.
okay
nah, it wasn't weird. Then mollie says she agrees with the not weird thing being weird, and suddenly it's an opinion shared by more than one person and I think it warrants a conversation.
why are you not starting a convo with lowkey about this then?
which one are you talking about? the one I asked what should have we done?!
