The Votecount wrote:
Votecount: as of post 179
d3sisted – 3 – Kison, IH, vollkan
IH – 2 – Trumpezia, d3sisted
SPAG – 1 – Head_Honcho
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch!
Not Voting – 5 – GatorGuy91, Jenter Brolincani, Paradoxombie, poppinpuffin, SPAG
With 11 alive, it's five to lynch.
I have been in games before where they modify the number of needed votes. This appears to be one of them. (I have bolded).
Question for mod - Is it currently 5 to lynch?
I mistakenly put 5 in the votecount. It should read 6 to lynch.
-MOD
d3s wrote:
1) It is indeed 6 to lynch.
2) Not once did I suggest that IH was expected to refute a pressure vote. That in itself is just plain silly.
3) I placed IH at L-4. Poppin came in and put him at L-3, which is as far as IH ever got.
4) This is nowhere near as "serious" as you make it out to be.
5) Poppin has long since removed her vote, and IH stands once again at L-4. Tell me again why you're both so anxious for me to remove an L-4 vote. Apparently, putting someone at L-4 is tantamount to L-2. (This is in response to IH as well.)
Finally, something tangible has emerged from my pressure vote.
Unvote; Vote: Vollkan
1) See above. I am only going by what the mod says.
2) I never said he had to refute your "vote"; don't misrepresent me. I said you had given no argument to rebut. My understanding of pressure voting is this: You vote someone you have some suspicion of so that they are forced to talk. In your case, you are doing the ridiculous thing of voting for someone simply for the purpose of bandwagoning without detailing anything that you want explained.
3) Your vote placed him at
L-3
(I am following the mod unless the mod says otherwise). You could quite easily have unvoted once Puffin hopped on with his similarly scummy vote. What I meant is that you accepted a L-2 (or 3 depending) pressure wagon which had no basis. Don't distance yourself from the fact is was L-2 simply because you weren't the last to vote.
On that note, I find d3s's behaviour as a whole more scummy, as evident from my readthrough, but Puffin also gets an
FoS
.
I would like Puffin to explain why he thought it was acceptable to place a L-2 pressure vote? (or L-3 depending on your view).
4) If this event came up in a vacuum; I would probably leave it with an FoS on you and puffin. But your behaviour throughout has been scummy throughout.
5) I never said I want you to remove your vote now; again you are misrepresenting me. I disagreed with your vote and your rationale and your subsequent contrived arguments.
d3s wrote: Finally, something tangible has emerged from my pressure vote.
Unvote; Vote: Vollkan
1) is most likely you are wrong.
2) is a misrepresentation by you
3) is avoiding your acceptance and support of the wagon
4) is your opinion
5) dodges the issue.
What is your case then?
