Scummies 2015 - Nomination Thread!

[shos]

nth kise's game.

(n+1)th

[shos]

Nominating Hilariously Unbalanced 2 for Game of the Year, Best Mutation, and Best Setup (if they exist)

I've never met a setup that fucked with my mind so hard as scum. I think that's all that has to be said. She said it was a mind fuck and she did not disappoint.

oh yeas

[shos]

Oh I also wanted to nominate

Magua for Best Flavor

for Mod Error Mafia. The roles and flip scenes were hilarious to read.

OH YEAS I forgot to do that

2nd

[shos]

lol @ Magua getting like 20 Nths

[shos]

I'd like to nominate

Everything is a Lie

, a micro game by wgeurts, for "Best Mutation".

The setup was BRILIANT. We had:
1. a werewolf team who were both traitors and masons of each other.
2. a mechanic that allowed all the dead players to keep playing the game, meaningfully, and actually almost keep playing in another thread.
^^^^THIS was amazing
3. a jester who was declared innocent child gamestart. Turned survivor after winning. [also won twice!]
4. an insane insane amnesiac cop - he was told that he was insane although he was sane.
5. a scum member with the ability to suicide at night and flip as town.
6. a moderator that was randomly vending useless items to players.

The game was batshit crazy, hilarious and very suspense-forcing. Everything was mind boggling, and the last day was truly thrilling.

[shos]

I...actually considered self-nominating for Kodak Moment, the game that I won - was revived back into the game and won again - but I realy thought that was badly looked upon, so I didn't.....should I?

[shos]

I'm never going to nominate a game other than one I'm involved in. I simply don't care enough about anyone else's games to actually read their game and determine if they deserve to be nominated, and I'm certain the majority of players feel the same way. It's simply too much time to properly evaluate a games and the merits of the nomination.

Then leave it to people who do?

Question is, thrn, how many games do the people who do, read?

[shos]

I'm never going to nominate a game other than one I'm involved in. I simply don't care enough about anyone else's games to actually read their game and determine if they deserve to be nominated, and I'm certain the majority of players feel the same way. It's simply too much time to properly evaluate a games and the merits of the nomination.

Then leave it to people who do?

Question is, thrn, how many games do the people who do, read?

If it's more than zero then leave it to them.

You don't understand. The point is that the pool of games from which people can be nominated is not all games. What if none of those people read that specific game I'm talking about? then I have no chance at all?

[shos]

Ythan, have you ever seen someone win a game twice?

[shos]

Yes, they did.

3rd that nom.

It was wonderful to see and play with. even on the final day I was sure I was losing ( I was scumbag ) and then I couldn't believe my eyes when he was scum.

[shos]

lol so fuck this
I wanna nom myself for winning twice in the same game as two third parties

[shos]

lol so fuck this
I wanna nom myself for winning twice in the same game as two third parties

Link? I'll nom you if true

I shit you not

[shos]

^^^ this is amazing.