In post 22, BNL wrote: In post 19, InflatablePie wrote: In post 15, BNL wrote:Don't like the activity rate in this game so far -.-
^thread's been open for ~17 hours
also instead of just saying "here's the math, we should do this, thoughts?" BNL is showing caution. don't like it.
LicketyQuickety wrote:low hanging fruit
why is BNL 'low-hanging fruit'?
How am I showing caution?
by not just listing the math outright
by waiting for town's approval before moving forward with your strategy
drunkposting side-note:
11 by Titus feels off. can't quite place a finger on why
In post 23, BNL wrote:Also I'd still like a reply from everyone (esp. Lickety and IPie) on whether they want to set up rooms with everyone (like last game) or reserve them for their suggested use.
I'd rather reserve them. I'd rather utilize them than abuse them, despite abusing them contributing towards a town win last game. I prefer being able to "break" the game as opposed to breaking the game, if that makes sense. Purely from a... morals perspective, so to speak.
---
Speaking of "breaking" the game, something I thought about prior to receiving my role PM - is it possibly strategic to have everyone post in-thread their two top BG targets (and the town players promising to 100% protect one of those two, obviously), to try and catch scum and/or force them to kill in certain pools? I haven't done the math, and also thought of this before realizing scum have a factional RB, but it
is
something I briefly considered.
I'm personally in favor of doing something like this, but given that smart and/or lucky scum can potentially work their way around this (in similar fashion to the "here's the third letter of my role name, here's a list of who I protected if it was this letter" style of breadcrumbing) it's probably just a waste of time.
@passionate - I have a (legit) read - scumread on BnLynchproof. Thoughts, and or read on BnLp?