In post 438, Titus wrote:Your entire ISO isbuddyingnot scumhunting. None of your posts have anything that intends to sort anyone Dave.
Why?
Click on Dwlee99's ISO. Ctrl+F "Elyse".
In post 438, Titus wrote:Your entire ISO isbuddyingnot scumhunting. None of your posts have anything that intends to sort anyone Dave.
Why?
Why not?In post 448, Frozen Angel wrote:Ice queen order : let put some pressure on Davsto. his latest posts are not good.
Ahh, not scumhunting, by doing things such as questioning people's actions, stating the odd townread and even finding something I fin scummy and voting based on it.no this posts are not showing your try to scum hunt.
I didn't do that? I merely said that I am fully aware that Titus can play better than this. That's... not calling her a newb. Borderline the opposite, I'd argue.I don't like the way you call the one accusing you noob
> makes point about all I've been doing is buddying and followingand seriously , the only thing is in your posts is buddying and following. the only push you did was against RC
I know what RC is like. Please pay attention and look to see that my reason I find RC scummy is, which I don't like ... because its RC! and RC is always like this ....
In post 450, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 438, Titus wrote:Your entire ISO isbuddyingnot scumhunting. None of your posts have anything that intends to sort anyone Dave.
Why?
Click on Dwlee99's ISO. Ctrl+F "Elyse".
In post 435, Davsto wrote:Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
In post 435, Davsto wrote:RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
In post 451, Davsto wrote:Why not?In post 448, Frozen Angel wrote:Ice queen order : let put some pressure on Davsto. his latest posts are not good.
In post 451, Davsto wrote:Ahh, not scumhunting, by doing things such as questioning people's actions, stating the odd townread and even finding something I fin scummy and voting based on it.no this posts are not showing your try to scum hunt.
In post 451, Davsto wrote:I didn't do that? I merely said that I am fully aware that Titus can play better than this. That's... not calling her a newb. Borderline the opposite, I'd argue.I don't like the way you call the one accusing you noob
In post 451, Davsto wrote:> makes point about all I've been doing is buddying and followingand seriously , the only thing is in your posts is buddying and following. the only push you did was against RC
> follows it up by immediately mention some scumhunting I've done, neither buddying nor following
In post 451, Davsto wrote:I know what RC is like. Please pay attention and look to see that my reason I find RC scummy is, which I don't like ... because its RC! and RC is always like this ....nothing to dowith typical RC traits, rather than assuming I think he's scum because of them.
Also, once again, apparently I'm the one buddying, after you make a post which is literally parroting every goddamn thing Titus has said. Nice one.
It wasn't really relevant to me. I'd already explained my vote, and was wondering why you considered my vote to be bad, so I asked. You answered by saying you thought RC was town. While you proceeded to explain why you thought RC was town, again, that was irrelevant to me; it wasn't the question I asked.In post 453, Grib wrote:In post 435, Davsto wrote:Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
Responding to the part that explained why I thought RadiantCowbells might be town was relevant, no? I was interested in discussing the mindset behind the vote, not whether or not you yourself were scum.
In post 435, Davsto wrote:RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
Alright, let's try this: do you already think he's scum, or are you trying to figure him out?
In post 455, Frozen Angel wrote:In post 451, Davsto wrote:Why not?In post 448, Frozen Angel wrote:Ice queen order : let put some pressure on Davsto. his latest posts are not good.
because their not
I don't get what you mean here. I analysed something and found it scummy. What's up with that?In post 451, Davsto wrote:Ahh, not scumhunting, by doing things such as questioning people's actions, stating the odd townread and even finding something I fin scummy and voting based on it.no this posts are not showing your try to scum hunt.
you didn't pressure the one you found scummy. you just assumed it.
pedit : let me talk!
Why?In post 451, Davsto wrote:I didn't do that? I merely said that I am fully aware that Titus can play better than this. That's... not calling her a newb. Borderline the opposite, I'd argue.I don't like the way you call the one accusing you noob
ok change what I said to what you said. I don't like it anyway.
But surely that means your accusation regarding me only ever buddying and following is less, you know, accusatory?In post 451, Davsto wrote:> makes point about all I've been doing is buddying and followingand seriously , the only thing is in your posts is buddying and following. the only push you did was against RC
> follows it up by immediately mention some scumhunting I've done, neither buddying nor following
you were buddying and following unless about RC ... (that was hard to understand?)
Last I checked, RC purposefully making a Morton's Fork where he leaves the target trapped whatever they do isn't his usual gist.In post 451, Davsto wrote:I know what RC is like. Please pay attention and look to see that my reason I find RC scummy is, which I don't like ... because its RC! and RC is always like this ....nothing to dowith typical RC traits, rather than assuming I think he's scum because of them.
Also, once again, apparently I'm the one buddying, after you make a post which is literally parroting every goddamn thing Titus has said. Nice one.
I can't see why you think RC is scum. your points are the thing I think its all are habits of regular RC.
Does buddying someone require them to be accused? Being nice and kind and pandering (buddying up to) to one of the generally considered stronger town players in a game is a thing that scum do. Rather often.and I buddying titus hahaha sure. is she accused? what I'm buddying of? I'm just pressuring you to see how you will react and this wasn't townish at all...
In post 452, Shiro wrote:In post 450, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 438, Titus wrote:Your entire ISO isbuddyingnot scumhunting. None of your posts have anything that intends to sort anyone Dave.
Why?
Click on Dwlee99's ISO. Ctrl+F "Elyse".
Eh nothing else is really buddying though and his agreement with Elyse could be just that agreement.
In post 456, Davsto wrote:It wasn't really relevant to me. I'd already explained my vote, and was wondering why you considered my vote to be bad, so I asked. You answered by saying you thought RC was town. While you proceeded to explain why you thought RC was town, again, that was irrelevant to me; it wasn't the question I asked.In post 453, Grib wrote:In post 435, Davsto wrote:Minus townpoints for only responding to the part that explained why you thought I was scum - the answer to the question I asked btw - rather than the bit explaining why RadiantCowbells is town. Riiiiight.
Responding to the part that explained why I thought RadiantCowbells might be town was relevant, no? I was interested in discussing the mindset behind the vote, not whether or not you yourself were scum.
In post 435, Davsto wrote:RadiantCowbells always brags about their play. It's hardly alignment indicative.
Alright, let's try this: do you already think he's scum, or are you trying to figure him out?
I am trying to figure it out but as you can see I often take a rather backseat approach to scumhunting; rather than hugely talking to them about literally everything, I'll tend to watch them but not make a huge deal out of it, since people tend to react differently when they know they're under interrogation than if they think they're just interacting normally. Plus, interaction really isn't my forte, and I find me doubting myself and getting paranoid a lot of the time (the amount of times that I have a first feeling that I follow a bit but then I doubt myself and search elsewhere only to find my first feeling was right is starting to get irritating).
In post 458, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 452, Shiro wrote:In post 450, MarioManiac4 wrote:In post 438, Titus wrote:Your entire ISO isbuddyingnot scumhunting. None of your posts have anything that intends to sort anyone Dave.
Why?
Click on Dwlee99's ISO. Ctrl+F "Elyse".
Eh nothing else is really buddying though and his agreement with Elyse could be just that agreement.
Awkward continued statement of agreement and listening to Elyse over anyone else
In post 459, Frozen Angel wrote:so your agreed the only place you really tried to push is RC? that doesn't seem like a desperate town trying to solve the game.
...please give me all your reads sir. about every player in game individually.
In post 466, Frozen Angel wrote:post 463 was townish
UNVOTE: Davsto
scum would have gone to try making a list. for now your not scum
In post 462, Grib wrote:I actually think Dwlee is town? Not at all a fan of any of the people voting for him.
In post 463, Davsto wrote:Shiro's shameless sheep is entirely not-alignment-indicative,
Titus wrote:@Dave, you can give reads on the active players. Second, even one post is enough to form a read sometimes. Give reads on who you can.
@Shiro, I only feel confident in Davesto scum ATM. I think everyone on Dave is town but for maybe Grib but Grib's still weak town.
In post 416, Dwlee99 wrote:I dont know, elyse. Grib's "is this going to happen" reads as town to me, though.